Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama challenges GOP to accept corporate tax deal
Associated Press ^ | Jul 30, 2013 5:14 PM EDT | Nedra Pickler

Posted on 07/30/2013 2:24:11 PM PDT by Olog-hai

President Barack Obama on Tuesday offered congressional Republicans a new corporate tax cut and jobs spending package he said might “help break through some of the political logjam in Washington,” only to have GOP lawmakers immediately throw cold water on the idea.

The announcement and quick rejection underscored how elusive common ground is between the Democratic White House and Republicans in Congress on fiscal issues. The divide was particularly stark on the corporate tax proposal given that both parties generally have supported overhauling the code for businesses, though the White House and Republicans have differed on specifics. …

The U.S. has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world, but many businesses avoid the full cost by taking advantage of deductions, credits and exemptions that Obama wants to eliminate. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: corporatetax; corporatetaxcuts; gopestablishment; jobs; liberalagenda; obama; obamaeconomyspeech; obamaeconomytour

1 posted on 07/30/2013 2:24:11 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I double dog dare ya


2 posted on 07/30/2013 2:26:51 PM PDT by molson209 (Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Obama isn't serious about reducing corporate tax rates. He is just trying to be the big man on campus and challenge the House Republicans.

The Republicans should counter with a lowered top rate for both the individual and corporate income taxes, but make it revenue neutral by eliminating deductions.

Historically, any time there has been a significant difference between the individual and corporate rates, businesses have responded by shifting their income taxation to the lowest one.

3 posted on 07/30/2013 2:31:22 PM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends







Free Republic is Our Beacon of Truth.
FReepers post articles 24/7 to keep All of Us informed.
Likewise, it takes All of Us to keep FR on the air!
Please Make your Donation today!

What would you do without Free Republic?

4 posted on 07/30/2013 2:31:36 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Isn't this the reason he let the "bush tax cut" expire, so he could "give it back" to the GOP for concessions?
5 posted on 07/30/2013 2:32:25 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature ($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There is simply no reason to bother with trusting Obama.

If he told me the sky was blue, I’d go check.


6 posted on 07/30/2013 2:39:54 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Bingo! And the dems can vote for this all day long hoping the repubs will kill it.


7 posted on 07/30/2013 2:43:02 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (If you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Obama also wants lawmakers to pour one-time revenue generated from the tax overhaul into jobs programs, including infrastructure, manufacturing and community colleges.

Here is the problem. The AP and the President and his minions would like the public to believe that this "corporate tax reduction" would help businesses. But Obama wants lawmakers to pour one-time revenue generated from the "tax overhaul" into jobs programs (additional subsidies... redistribute the wealth).

In reality, businesses "Effective Tax" rate would go up. Their taxes actually paid to the government would be more than they are now. How? Obama would eliminate all the deductions that so drastically cause the actual tax rate to be so different from the effective tax rate (Actual Paid).

Tax Lesson for FReepers that don't understand the difference: The AGI (Adjusted Gross Income) is what a company pays a tax rate on. This is after deductions. Corporate deductions are now specific to industries and even companies after years of meddling with laws. While the corporate tax rate may be 35%+, few companies actually pay this against the profits that they really make. They move the profits through accounting strategies off shore. They invest or spend specifically to lower their AGI. Then they apply tax credits through loopholes and additional accounting tactics to where they get their real tax burdens as low as they can. (BTW - This effort is all pretty costly in itself. It takes an army of lawyers and accountants depending on the size and scope of the business.) Some companies may only pay about 10% while others end up paying 29% after the dust settles and depending on which numbers you use as the basis of measuring. SIMPLY PUT: It's all smoke and mirrors. Companies get away with whatever the IRS let's them get away with. GE, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Etc. The little guys don't have the resources to game the system as much but still enough to get below what Obama is proposing.

Bottom Line, the president wants to lower the tax rate and take away the deductions. This would force most, if not all to pay more. With deductions what they are, most mom and pop organizations get to show very little profit after they pay their staff, buy equipment, pay rent, insurance, office supplies, cleaning.... business expenses. If the fed is collecting more revenue, then they are taking more private money out of the economy! IT'S BAD!

The republicans should counter. "Make the tax rate 15% and you, Mr. President have a deal." He wouldn't take it because that rate might actually reduce revenue to the government, free up private capital and allow businesses to grow.

8 posted on 07/30/2013 2:46:32 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (If the government told us to expect rain, I'd schedule an outdoor wedding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

9 posted on 07/30/2013 2:48:32 PM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
If the &#$*@!& mexican illegals deserve COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM THEN WE DESERVE COMPREHENSIVE TAX REFORM AND REDUCTION AND COMPREHENSIVE GOVERNMENT REDUCTION!
10 posted on 07/30/2013 2:58:36 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The supposed deal doesn’t even make sense. It was designed to re-energize the OWS types and hide the Obama crony relationships with big corporations like GE,Goldman Sachs and Berkshire Hathaway.

The real news in that speech had nothing to do with the Obama dare, it had to do with a promise to do an end around on the Supreme Court ruling regarding voter ID.


11 posted on 07/30/2013 3:19:15 PM PDT by Eva (B Obama is to Trayvon Martin as Al Sharpton is to Tawana Brawley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson