Skip to comments.Times Free Press responds to inaccuracies in coverage of Drew Johnson firing (Obama editorial)
Posted on 08/03/2013 6:21:09 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
Contrary to statements made by former Free Press editor Drew Johnson and national media reports, Johnson was told on multiple prior occasions not to make material changes to editorials or headlines once they were approved by the editor responsible for the page.
On Monday night, Johnson changed the approved headline on his Tuesday editorial from, Keep your jobs plan to yourself, Mr. President: Your policies have harmed Chattanooga enough already to Take your jobs plan and shove it, Mr. President: Your policies have harmed Chattanooga enough.
However, he waited until his editor had left for the day before changing the headline. That is a violation of our clear editing practice, and our trust. He admitted the following day that he failed to follow the standard set for him.
The language he chose was vulgar and not appropriate for this newspaper. Even Johnson himself admitted that the headline was harsh and perhaps crass to a fault in an editorial he wrote for this Sunday, which will not run.
Johnsons firing was not about yielding to political pressure. He was not fired for writing an editorial criticizing President Barack Obama. The body of the editorial was approved for publication; only the headline was changed.
The newspaper has allowed Johnson to write his opinions freely and without censorship during the time he worked here even when he wrote about very controversial topics that many readers complained about. In the past year we have printed at least 46 editorials critical of Obama on the Free Press page.
In fact the only instance when the Times Free Press ever denied Johnson the freedom to present his views was last week when he referred to pornography as a miracle product and touted the benefits of pornography stating that if teenagers watched pornography it would result in lower rates of teenage pregnancy.
The Times Free Press values having two editorial pages to express both conservative and liberal views. We encourage differing viewpoints and dissent, we believe having competing views makes community stronger. We expect those debates to be respectful.
At least they didn’t blame it on the intern.
Obama is vulgar.
I never thought a word could be insulted, but the word 'vulgar' just was.
I agree with what he said.
I think it should be painted across every bridge our liar president passes under and plastered across every billboard in America.
I think planes should pull it on streamers behind them.
I think other planes should write it in the sky with smoke.
I think it should run on banners on every single TV station.
And I think Flo should sing it on Progressive commercials.
"He admitted the following day that he failed to follow the standard set for him.
He made his statement, but he won’t be making any more of them.
At least the public got to read one frank headline.
Obama is the one who said “get in their faces”, called his critics “tea baggers” (f@ggots), and used the IRS to harass his political opponents.
No more “nice guy”. The gloves have to come off.
Yes, we’ll add Drew Johnson’s name to the long list of Leftist journalists and editors fired for straying into vulgarity... oh, wait, I can’t find that list.
It’s a song for God’s sake, the paper just showed their total lack of humor. What a bunch of jerks, I hope the guy gets a job with a real newspaper some day.
I hope Glenn Beck hires him for the Blaze and doubles his salary.
I can't help but think this little bit of information was included to destroy his reputation with supporters. Wonder what he really wrote about porn . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.