I appreciate the comments, but I’m not sure that holds water, using the logic in the article. And I’m not saying I totally believe the article’s logic, but it is an interesting thought.
My problem with your suggesting, is that I don’t think the Muslim Brotherhood registers as negatively as Al Qaeda does on the political Richter scale. It would be even less an affront to American sensitivities than supplying Al Qaeda would be.
I’d have to say the Iran angle carries a lot more water here, if you’re truly desperate to hide something.
Now, what I don’t get, is why you arm Iran? How does that play into Bathhouse Barry’s game plan? Does he want Iraq and Afghanistan to come unglued that bad?
Is there another angle I’m missing?
I am sure there are a lot of angles we are all missing. A lot of this is happening in the shadows, and many of the players themselves probably don’t know all the angles...
I read the article, every post and 2 things missin so far
near immediately Hillary lawyer’d up
as soon a NYT’s comment said Benghazi would not hurt Hillary’s comin election and
2. Valerie Jarrett.... born 11.14.56 in Shiraz, Iran and not one mention of her here yet
There is a piece missin and we know it but as yet it ain’t clicked