Skip to comments.New Arkansas poll shows Democrat Sen. Mark Pryor already trailing Tom Cotton
Posted on 08/06/2013 8:34:18 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier
When U.S. Rep. Tom Cotton, R (at right) announces his candidacy for Senate at a barbecue this evening, he will be doing so as an early frontrunner in a 2014 race that could ultimately determine which party controls the U.S. Senate.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeintel.com ...
Then why did Blance Lincoln lose in a landslide in 2010? Why didn’t Obama win Arkansas? Get a grip.
Fraud is a factor in rat victories. Stupidity is a MUCH larger factor.
To whit, this jerk Pyror only got elected in the first place because
1)His daddy was a Senator
2)The Republican Senator he beat left his wife and married his mistress
And enough clueless yokels thought either of those reasons were enough reason to vote for Pryor.
He won reelection in 2008 because the GOP, weak nationally and in Arkansas that year (Huckabee was not good for the state party as RINO Governors usually aren’t), did not bother to run a candidate, none at all.
If Clinton hadn’t turned his back on Arkansas when he and the hag moved to NY, they’d still be voting for him. Slapping Arkansans in the face finally got their attention.
Pryor’s pretty durn awful, for sure.
99% of Black women vote Democrat and most white men vote Republican. This is why you have a huge gender gap. I doubt black women vote against the GOP because of abortion. I would guess a majority of young white women vote Republican.
“I would guess a majority of young white women vote Republican.”
Not sure I buy your numbers. Black men also vote RAT so the Black vote S/B a wash. Then, if that’s the case, what accounts for the fact that women are still more than 50% for FUBO? In the overall numbers, I just deduct 12% from the “we like Obama column” to take the Blacks out of the equation.
hen why did Blance Lincoln lose in a landslide in 2010? Why didnt Obama win Arkansas? Get a grip.
Voter fraud was not completely set for midterms THEN.......
Because rats rarely voted in midterms.. THEN...
NOW is another factor.. voter fraud has be “refined to an art” by rats.. finaced by Obamanoids..
Arkansaw 2010 is not Arkansaw TODAY..
Grab yer Onions the fix is in... Hold tight they might get cut off..
RINOs are stealth democrats... it is about the MONEY..
Darn. I was ready to sent Broun some money. Broun is not afraid to stand up for his Christian beliefs. Plus the Establishment is terrified of Broun. Rove thinks Broun is a Todd Akin Time Bomb. Perhaps, Broun poll position is because he is unfamiliar with the Atlanta metro area. If Broun can’t move the needle, then I will go with Doc Gingrey. One GA candidate that I don’t want to win is Bob Barr.
I dont think Cotton will ever be in the position to be the 60th vote to pass amnesty or invade Syria.
One GA candidate that I dont want to win is Bob Barr.
I'm with you there.
Actually, those numbers aren’t spectacular for Michelle Nunn, since that’s likely about as high as she’ll perform statewide (low 40s) barring a disastrous GOP nominee. Nunn resembles the liberal Senator from Alaska, Murkowski. I also get a possible lesbian vibe from her.
YES; Pryor must go!!! I am giving serious consideration to switching to the RAT party so that I can vote for Cotton several times. Will be sending a contribution to the campaign today.
Well she’s got a husband. And 2 more Nunns have emerged from her womb. Of course that doesn’t prove she isn’t a friend of Sappho. To me she resembles another daughter of a Senate rat, Sheila Simon (but not as bad).
Despite her father not being the most liberal rat and her talk of centrism I’m certain she’s a dangerous radical.
I don’t think she’ll win (or that McConnell would lose in Kentucky) but I’d hate to have to expend resources defending that seat.
That is I don’t think she’ll win if she faces Gingrey or Kingston. Broun’s nomination would put the seat in play. We can’t sleep on any of the races we expect to win, not after the FUBAR that was 2012.
Of the three, I’d prefer Broun. Gingrey is meh. Kingston is pure establishment, and for him to run for the Senate after 22 years in the House is ridiculous. Swapping that much seniority to be a backbencher is plain dumb (even Gingrey is ill advised to just jettison his 12 years of seniority as well). Ideally, I wouldn’t mind Herman Cain taking a shot at it. Just someone new to the game pledged to be a real pain in the ass to the party establishment and “bipartisanship.”
Well Broun trails Nunn in the poll by 41-26.
He is a Paulbot isn’t he, is that not correct? I smell Akin potential.
You are right about Kingston. I thought Gingrey was okay but there was that gun control remark after that stupid school shooting.
Actually, my main problem with Broun is separate and apart from any concerns about his being a Paulbot, it’s his age. He would turn 69 just months after the start of the 2015 Congress. Not exactly a good age to start to embark on a Senate career. It’s funny that his official photo makes him look 20 years younger.
Mark Pryor is already attacking Tom Cotton and so are some liberal organizations. That’s a very good sign. They would not be doing this if they were confident of Pryor’s chances.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.