Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presenting The Latest In Government Oppression...
Zero Hedge ^ | 8-9-13 | Simon Black

Posted on 08/09/2013 2:37:54 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat

It just never stops.

Here on the European continent, the bureaucrats who run the EU have recently proven to the world how much a ‘government guarantee’ is really worth.

We’ve been discussing in this column lately how the modern banking system is a total fraud– that dictatorial control of 70% of the world’s money supply has been awarded to just four central bankers.

And that the vast majority of banks, especially in the western world, are laughably illiquid… and very thinly capitalized.

But most people never really worry too much about their banks. We’re told, pratically since birth, that banks are safe, responsible, conservative financial stewards. This belief is universally held as truth across society.

And to cap it all off, we’re told that the government will step up to backstop any bank losses and ensure depositors don’t lose a single penny.

The numbers obviously tell a very different story. In the US, for example, many banks hold less than 3% of their customer deposits in cash, and they have to use clever accounting tricks and off-balance sheet vehicles to mask the true health of their balance sheets.

And the FDIC, which is supposed to bail out US depositors in the event of a crisis, has a mere 1.35% of total US deposits in cash. This isn’t safe. This isn’t conservative. It doesn’t even register as a drop in the bucket.

In Europe, though, they’ve just decided that they’re -not really- going to insure deposits at full value after all (see the article in its original German here)

Now, if a bank goes under, governments will make very, very basic payments to depositors, and restrict withdrawals to just 100-200 euros per day.

There’s a term for this. It’s called capital controls. And it’s something that almost every bankrupt government in history has resorted to using.

Capital controls are essentially a restriction on the free-flow of capital. It can take a number of different forms– gold criminalization, bank account confiscation, foreign exchange restrictions, etc.

But at the end of the day, the effect is the same - capital controls are just another way of transferring wealth from citizens to the government, like dairy cows to a farmer.

Meanwhile, across the water, I am sad to report that a number of secure email platforms like Lavabit and Silent Circle, have now folded under intense pressure from the United States government.

Lavabit was an email service used by Edward Snowden. From the very cryptic message that CEO Ladar Levison left on his website, it appears that he has been approached by the NSA to turn over email records.

Rather than work with the NSA, Levison has shuttered his operations.

And to boot, Silent Circle CEO Mike Janke announced that his organization was pre-emptively discontinuing its email platform ‘Silent Mail’.

Janke says he sees the writing on the wall and knows “USG [US government] would come after us.”

It’s incredible that two businesses essentially have to commit suicide in order to keep from violating their promises to their customers.

Just another week in the free world. Have you hit your breaking point yet?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: benghazi; fastandfurious; impeachnow; irs
In case you don't think you could lose funds in an FDIC insured bank, what's happening in Europe is illustrative.

As a depositor, you are merely an unsecured creditor who is protected by the FDIC insurance scheme which is in turn backed by the full faith and credit of owebama, boehner, and mcconnell. And remember that you're taking this risk in exchange for 0.5% interest.

1 posted on 08/09/2013 2:37:54 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Lots of complaining, but what are you/we going to DO about it?


2 posted on 08/09/2013 2:41:37 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Whoa! Butt-pucker ping.


3 posted on 08/09/2013 2:44:04 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Behavior Insights Team Exigency Monitoring Executive (BITEME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat2
I quit using banks. Period.

/johnny

4 posted on 08/09/2013 2:46:00 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

So, where do you stash your millions?


5 posted on 08/09/2013 2:56:53 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: expat2
I would rather be free than have millions.

/johnny

6 posted on 08/09/2013 3:00:50 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

The New Old Thing:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/new-old-thing_745838.html?page=1


7 posted on 08/09/2013 3:03:56 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
We’re told, pratically since birth, that banks are safe, responsible, conservative financial stewards.

Think of banks like telephone exchanges, rather than static strongboxes. The phone system is designed to handle most traffic flows, but the .01% events--like traffic during natural disasters--swamp the system. Fractional reserve banking is like that, too. No one is supposed to add it all up--it's just supposed to handle most withdrawals, most of the time.

When things get too far out of whack, you get Cyprus.

What most people don't realize is that all banks are low-level hedge funds. They invest heavily in questionable assets, but are supposed to not get too crazy. But, when they do--there is risk--either direct to the depositors' accounts, or indirectly to them as taxpayers.

In Cyprus, the banks became international hedge funds, accepting so much out-of-country money that there was no way to dump it on the taxpayers. Oops--the depositors had to make up the shortfall.

To ward off adverse comments, let me say I don't like this state of affairs. Banking should probably be like a boring utility. Unfortunately, the government (US and others) need for more and more funds motivates central bankers to keep real interest rates negative. That means that more and more risk has to be taken, both implicitly by depositors, and explicitly by the banks that "hold" their funds.

8 posted on 08/09/2013 3:07:10 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat2

“Lots of complaining, but what are you/we going to DO about it?”

Well, that’s a question for each person to answer for themselves. Some random thoughts...

- The banks aren’t very safe. People used to laugh about keeping money in a cookie jar, but given the economic malfeasance of recent years, it’s not so bad an idea.

- Clan up.

- Take steps to maximize privacy.

- Food, water, shelter, the means to protect it. The necessities.

- Marketable, useful skills.

- Avoid criminals. Both official and unofficial.

- Eliminating debt and minimizing expenses where possible.

- Engaging in activities that boost value, but not necessarily generating income. Such as gardening, sewing, etc.


9 posted on 08/09/2013 4:38:32 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Power disintegrates when people withdraw their obedience and support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
we’re told that the government will step up to backstop any bank losses and ensure depositors don’t lose a single penny.

Just at 'TBTF' banks. Others, only up to $250,000.00.

10 posted on 08/09/2013 5:24:23 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

“Just at ‘TBTF’ banks. Others, only up to $250,000.00.”

Given a repeat of 2007, I wouldn’t count on seeing that $250K, either.


11 posted on 08/09/2013 5:32:53 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Power disintegrates when people withdraw their obedience and support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Well, remember when they started passing out the $250,000, the guarantee was just for $100,000. They politically had to go back and give everyone else what they had given to the friends.


12 posted on 08/09/2013 6:40:42 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson