Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freepers help me out here..what am I looking at?
Seminole County Clerk of Courts ^ | 08/08/2013 | maryanne morse

Posted on 08/10/2013 10:37:32 PM PDT by OL Hickory

08/08/2013-MOTION REINSTATE AND CONTINUANCE AGAINST ABOVE NAME DEFENDANT GEORGE ZIMMERMAN

(Excerpt) Read more at seminoleclerk.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: affidavit; doublejeopardy; florida; george; travon; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last
Was sent this on twitter..I am no legal eagle what does all this mean??
1 posted on 08/10/2013 10:37:32 PM PDT by OL Hickory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

What is “double jeopardy” Alex?


2 posted on 08/10/2013 10:41:18 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Can you pull up the actual motions?

The titles are a bit vague.

08/08/2013 MOTN MOTION REINSTATE AND CONTINUANCE AGAINST ABOVE NAME DEFENDANT GEORGE
08/08/2013 MOTN MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN ON BASIS OF NEW ARGUMENT ALL IN COMPLIANCE TO THE
08/08/2013 MOTN RULES OF DISTRICT COURT CREDIBLE ARGUMENT WITH PERMISSION TO ADVISEMENT
08/08/2013 MOTN FAMILY
08/08/2013 MOTN MOTION TO AMEND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND REINSTATE THIS ACTION
08/08/2013 MOTN AND TRANSFER THE ACTION TO THE MIAMI DADE DISTRICT COURT HOUSE
08/08/2013 MOTN FOR REHEARING OF PROBABLE CAUSE ARGUMENT AGAINST GEORGE ZIMMERMAN
07/24/2013 CTBD CERTIFICATE OF DISCHARGE BOND - BOND#: X1M0000086


3 posted on 08/10/2013 10:41:25 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

So far... it looks like a “support FR” banner.


4 posted on 08/10/2013 10:41:52 PM PDT by Utilizer (Ba-con Ah'hkkba'aar! <- In muzlim world, men=men and goats=nervous. ->)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
Read it as paragraphs:

MOTION REINSTATE AND CONTINUANCE AGAINST ABOVE NAME DEFENDANT GEORGE MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN ON BASIS OF NEW ARGUMENT ALL IN COMPLIANCE TO THE RULES OF DISTRICT COURT CREDIBLE ARGUMENT WITH PERMISSION TO ADVISEMENT FAMILY.

MOTION TO AMEND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND REINSTATE THIS ACTION AND TRANSFER THE ACTION TO THE MIAMI DADE DISTRICT COURT HOUSE FOR REHEARING OF PROBABLE CAUSE ARGUMENT AGAINST GEORGE ZIMMERMAN.

5 posted on 08/10/2013 10:44:04 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Actually, it seems like a long title... Putting the lines together gives.

MOTION REINSTATE AND CONTINUANCE AGAINST ABOVE NAME DEFENDANT GEORGE MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN ON BASIS OF NEW ARGUMENT ALL IN COMPLIANCE TO THE RULES OF DISTRICT COURT CREDIBLE ARGUMENT WITH PERMISSION TO ADVISEMENT FAMILY MOTION TO AMEND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND REINSTATE THIS ACTION AND TRANSFER THE ACTION TO THE MIAMI DADE DISTRICT COURT HOUSE FOR REHEARING OF PROBABLE CAUSE ARGUMENT AGAINST GEORGE ZIMMERMAN


6 posted on 08/10/2013 10:48:53 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Oh boy! Someone’s gonna get upset at this racist system who won’t let them have their way!

Nuts!


7 posted on 08/10/2013 10:49:17 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Holder found something new which he believes is justification for another trial?


8 posted on 08/10/2013 10:49:46 PM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Nothing new on the Zimmerman defense site.

http://www.gzlegalcase.com


9 posted on 08/10/2013 10:50:15 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

A whole lotta scribble and nothing. Some Obot still fantasizing.


10 posted on 08/10/2013 10:51:34 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

I’m not a legal eagle but it looks like someone is trying to retry GZ on murder 2 charges in Miami-Dade after he has been acquitted. These were evidently filed on Thursday.

I guess they think they have a good shot at convicting him with an all black jury in Miami (and they are right). Double jeopardy is not a problem as the constitution can now be ignored.


11 posted on 08/10/2013 10:52:12 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Leftists don’t even like this presumption of innocence thing (until they are charged with something)


12 posted on 08/10/2013 10:59:11 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

It also means that court clerks will file any motion presented to the court no matter how absurd.


13 posted on 08/10/2013 11:01:56 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

How come we can’t pull up the actual filing?


14 posted on 08/10/2013 11:05:01 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

I suspect it’s related to the lawsuit from the bodyguards.


15 posted on 08/10/2013 11:07:42 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

Only other thing that comes to mind was the charge related to the defense fund money.


16 posted on 08/10/2013 11:13:47 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Better parsing than me. First one filed is.

MOTION TO AMEND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND REINSTATE THIS ACTION AND TRANSFER THE ACTION TO THE MIAMI DADE DISTRICT COURT HOUSE FOR REHEARING OF PROBABLE CAUSE ARGUMENT AGAINST GEORGE ZIMMERMAN.

- ‘Amend theHouse of Representatives’. Say what?
- ‘reinstate this action’. Seems clear enough
- ‘transfer the action to Miami Dade’. Also clear
- ‘rehearing ofprobable cause argument’. Also clear

MOTION REINSTATE AND CONTINUANCE AGAINST ABOVE NAME DEFENDANT GEORGE MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN ON BASIS OF NEW ARGUMENT ALL IN COMPLIANCE TO THE RULES OF DISTRICT COURT CREDIBLE ARGUMENT WITH PERMISSION TO ADVISEMENT FAMILY.

- reinstate
- continuance
- new argument
- advisement family?


17 posted on 08/10/2013 11:18:18 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Looks like a third party motion.


18 posted on 08/10/2013 11:21:31 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Being tried twice for the same offence.
Regardless of whether you won or lost the first trial.
19 posted on 08/10/2013 11:21:38 PM PDT by moose07 (the truth will out ,one day. This is not the post you are looking for ....move along now....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Maybe they are going after a another charge. He was found not guilty on 2nd degree. Depending on what the jury found him not guilty of, there may be room for another charge like manslaughter or negligent homicide.


20 posted on 08/10/2013 11:24:43 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Could be a civil trial.

He doesn’t have any money, so there’s nothing to gain in terms of monetary.


21 posted on 08/10/2013 11:25:32 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer; 17th Miss Regt; OL Hickory
It's late, I'm tired, I'm not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV, but I'm always ready to make a total ass out of myself on things I don't know anything about. So here goes my conversational non legal non expert guess.

The police did not arrest Zimmerman because after they investigated this, THOROUGHLY, they decided that they lacked probable cause.

The police were overruled by a political racist pandering political system and Zimmerman was forced to go to trial anyway.

Perhaps Zimmerman's attorneys want to get a LEGAL RULING showing that there was NO PROBABLE CAUSE to arrest Zimmerman. The lawyers would naturally want to take this case out of the trial jurisdiction because they believe the legal personnel showed obvious bias against Zimmerman.

If they can get a legal ruling showing that there was no probable cause to arrest him, then that may remove a major impediment to filing lawsuits against the people who forced this to trial, in other words, denying them "qualified immunity," because a reasonable person with the same qualifications and experience would not have done this to Zimmerman. Just a guess, but it could be very very bad news personally for those who prosecuted him if it is ruled that there was no probable cause for arrest.

22 posted on 08/10/2013 11:27:28 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

No, this is the criminal docket.


23 posted on 08/10/2013 11:28:21 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

No, specifically say ‘reinstate the charge’


24 posted on 08/10/2013 11:29:20 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Detailed Information for Case 592012CF001083A

“MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE
...

07/13/2013 JDNG JUDGMENT OF NOT GUILTY
07/13/2013 VRFN VERDICT FORM NOT GUILTY-REDACT”

All I need to see. This case is closed.


25 posted on 08/10/2013 11:29:50 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Nice guess, but probably not.

Zimmerman’s lawyers filed all documents on his web site. There is nothing there. So unlikely from his side.


26 posted on 08/10/2013 11:30:52 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: moose07

“Answer must be stated in the form of a ques-”
Suddenly, a giant robot fist pummels Trebeks smug mug into the set pieces..


27 posted on 08/10/2013 11:31:30 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

I can’t see any prosecutor launching a second trial, even if he’s found some charge the original prosecutor choose not to follow.

My guess is that some person has applied to retry the case. I don’t know if the courts will accept such an action.


28 posted on 08/10/2013 11:31:39 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

I don’t you can do that.


29 posted on 08/10/2013 11:32:16 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

That’s what it looks like. Some third party probably filed this.


30 posted on 08/10/2013 11:38:14 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

I’m drunk so I have no idea


31 posted on 08/10/2013 11:43:54 PM PDT by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Oh yes! When does that episode go to air....?


32 posted on 08/10/2013 11:50:10 PM PDT by moose07 (the truth will out ,one day. This is not the post you are looking for ....move along now....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: moose07

It won’t, they had too decant yet another clone Trebek.
Then they refilmed the scene without the robots.
You could say that Alex was in...
*sunglasses on*
...Jeopardy.


33 posted on 08/10/2013 11:54:30 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Also unlikely you’d see an amicus filing from his side.


34 posted on 08/10/2013 11:55:57 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Some lawyer thinks he can get some money out of the parents. If filed by a lawyer he can be disbarred. If not filed by a lawyer hell be laughed out of court.


35 posted on 08/10/2013 11:57:07 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

It means someone’s been swigging Purple Drank.


36 posted on 08/10/2013 11:57:50 PM PDT by Bullish (Psalm 46)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Here is the Affidavit of Probable Cause. I believe it was filed in April 2012. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/118653372/State-of-Florida-v-George-Zimmerman-—Affidavit-of-Probable-Cause .

I believe this is a motion by Zimmerman’s attorneys to reinstate a hearing regarding this affidavit, in light of the fact that we now know they lied in the sworn affidavit.


37 posted on 08/11/2013 12:03:17 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

I hope you’re right. Crump & Co have issued a bunch of lies that need to be destroyed.


38 posted on 08/11/2013 12:14:40 AM PDT by Ray76 ( Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

I hope you’re right. Crump & Co have issued a bunch of lies that need to be destroyed.


39 posted on 08/11/2013 12:14:42 AM PDT by Ray76 ( Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Most likely, the year was entered wrong by the clerk (2013 instead of 2012) and the filings are in regard to earlier phases of the case against Zimmerman. I have read through enough court files (including some in the Seminole County courthouse) to have seen similar errors before.


40 posted on 08/11/2013 12:19:15 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

I read somewhere, and now I can’t find it again, that Florida Law provides for defendants who claim self defense to be compensated if they are prosecuted in the absence of a valid Affidavit of Probable Cause. I’d like to find that again, and look into it further. I hope it’s true.


41 posted on 08/11/2013 12:26:08 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
IN COMPLIANCE TO THE RULES

if it were copied from an actual legal document, and not someone's fantasy, the "to" would be "with", or so it would seem.

42 posted on 08/11/2013 1:49:58 AM PDT by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

43 posted on 08/11/2013 1:50:10 AM PDT by goron (If this be treason, make the most of it! - Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

third parties have no standing. they aren’t affected.


44 posted on 08/11/2013 1:53:31 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
-- Maybe they are going after a another charge. He was found not guilty on 2nd degree. Depending on what the jury found him not guilty of, there may be room for another charge like manslaughter or negligent homicide. --

A couple points, but basically that would still be double jeopardy.

Zimmerman was found not guilty of both Murder 2 and the necessarily included lesser offense of manslaughter.

Double jeopardy ostensibly covers all charges flowing from the same act or actions. The government can;t keep putting a person to trial on "lesser and lesser offenses" that flow from the same act. The exception right now is that the federal government will violate the constitution (and the judges think this is a nifty idea!) by charging with a separate federal crime (e.g., hate crime), if the state fails to obtain a conviction. That's how the police officers in the Rodney King incident were jailed. Tried twice for the same acts, but one trial was on a state offense by state prosecutors, the other was a federal offense tried by federal prosecutors.

45 posted on 08/11/2013 2:19:36 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

This is a BS filing by a third party. The Court will reject it. IIRC, it was filed by a lawyer who practices in a different state, otherwise the lawyer would be sanctioned by the Court for a frivolous, legally baseless filing.


46 posted on 08/11/2013 2:23:26 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Looks to me like they want a trial in Dade County for a civil rights violation with a FL legislature sign off.


47 posted on 08/11/2013 2:47:41 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

It means Jeantell is now a lawyah. She can’t read no “not guilty” verdict.


48 posted on 08/11/2013 3:37:12 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall With no one to raise him up; And I will set)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Appeasement


49 posted on 08/11/2013 3:41:38 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
Reparations.
50 posted on 08/11/2013 3:55:40 AM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (Obama lies, smokes, blasphemes, eats pork, reads your mail, eavesdrops and drinks during Ramadan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson