Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Levin on Hannity tonight, Cavuto tomorrow.
1 posted on 08/12/2013 5:44:27 PM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SMGFan

at first glance I am sceptical,,


2 posted on 08/12/2013 5:58:35 PM PDT by Big Red Badger ("don't hurt me , G 'man!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

The 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia also involved states without input from Congress. Most delegates were under the impression the purpose of the Convention was to merely modify the Articles of Confederation but James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay had different plans. They intended all along to use the Convention as a means to replace the Articles of Confederation with a stronger Federal Government via the Constitution. They were able to bargain with most of the delegates, bit by bit, to support a stronger federal government. Some objected and left before the Convention was adjourned but most supported the Constitution.

Article 12 of The Articles of Confederation required approval from all the states and Congress to alter the document. This process did not occur. Only 9 states were needed to ratify the Constitution. Congress under the Articles of Confederation never approved the Constitution. It can therefore be argued the Constitution is illegal.

An equally important point is that delegates and those they represent can demand the Convention for a particular purpose or purposes but all that can change once delegates get behind closed doors. Anything can happen as occurred in 1787 and no one on the outside can stop a sudden turn of events. The result could very well be a document unlike what was originally intended. A Convention would be a dangerous proposition.


3 posted on 08/12/2013 6:00:31 PM PDT by Sherman Hale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
Levin is pretty cagey, good thing he's almost always on our side.

The motivation is the fact that states can take power from the Federal Government through a Constitutional Convention and would not be allowed to do so any other way, plus, if the Convention is pirated to destroy the Bill of Rights, those same states can refuse to ratify, as only a quarter of states plus one will kill the pirated document.

However, nothing is without risk, including inaction which will likely lead to a Soviet Islamicist America.

7 posted on 08/12/2013 6:16:01 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
Dems and Pubs ignore the Constitution and laws now. Adding amendments isn't going to make much difference.

/johnny

8 posted on 08/12/2013 6:16:19 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

I have felt since the mid-60s that there are a few areas of the Constitution that need to be groomed or tweaked or whatever one wants to call it.


9 posted on 08/12/2013 6:21:10 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Learn three chords and you, too, can be a Rock Star!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
Keep it simple and effective. Just repeal the 17th Amendment.

No one could cheat on that.

10 posted on 08/12/2013 6:48:49 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

This just might be LIVING HISTORY - Big time!


12 posted on 08/12/2013 8:54:13 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson