Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lee Co. NAACP gets go-ahead to picket county over Robert E. Lee portrait
fox4now.com ^ | August 12, 2013 | Sara Belsole

Posted on 08/13/2013 3:31:55 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

FORT MYERS, Fla. - The Lee County NAACP says it got approval from the state NAACP to picket Lee County over the Robert E. Lee portrait that hangs in the commission chambers.

"It's a symbol of racism and division," Lee County NAACP President James Muwakkil said in a July 9th interview.

Muwakkil sent a letter to Lee County commissioners in early July, asking them to take down the portrait, but they voted to keep it up.

So Sunday night, Muwakkil sent out an email, saying the county "proudly displays General Robert E. Lee's portrait," and that "General Lee did not believe blacks should hold any positions in government."

The email also cites the county's lack of black department heads and black contractors as more reasons the NAACP wants the portrait taken down.

Muwakkil told Fox 4 he is now brainstorming with the state NAACP President ways to move forward, which could include a sit-in at the chambers, picketing and protesting.

District Two Commissioner Cecil Pendergrass told Fox 4 he expected this reaction, especially after the Commission voted to keep the portrait.

Other than the one request from James Muwakkil, we have not had any other requests to remove it. I have had thousands of request to keep it and in support of it to keep the picture in the chambers," Pendergrass said.

A Lee County native, Pendergrass said he doesn't think the portrait represents racism.

"It's history, it's part of history of Lee County," Pendergrass said. "There's a statue of him, a portrait, a Confederate uniform on Lee Street."

(Excerpt) Read more at fox4now.com ...


TOPICS: US: Florida
KEYWORDS: generallee; naacp; robertelee; shakedown

1 posted on 08/13/2013 3:31:55 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

NAACP “[is] a symbol of racism and division.”


2 posted on 08/13/2013 3:33:41 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("When there is no penalty for failure, failures proliferate." George F. Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

My tan is going to go away. Where is the NAACP?


3 posted on 08/13/2013 3:34:21 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Next they’ll demand the name of the county be changed. Morons.


4 posted on 08/13/2013 3:34:52 PM PDT by clintonh8r (white Caucasian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Idiots lol!


5 posted on 08/13/2013 3:35:28 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The point of this is that, ‘white history’ is raciss.


6 posted on 08/13/2013 3:37:21 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Having blackheads is a reason? Wow, they ARE sensitive!


7 posted on 08/13/2013 3:37:26 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
King County in Washington State was changed from being named after William Rufus King (our 13th Vice President and a slaveholder) to being named after Martin Luther King instead.

The country crest was changed from a crown to a black and white image of Martin Luther King's face.

The legislature voted on this.

8 posted on 08/13/2013 3:39:33 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Whites have to get over letting 13% of the population run the show. Get over the guilt. If you refuse to accept guilt its very hard for the perpetually outraged to maintain traction.


9 posted on 08/13/2013 3:40:56 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"Muwakkil" is not an American name. Who cares what he thinks? And if it's an adopted, Moslem-excuse-me name, he's pretending to be a foreigner, because he thinks he's too cool for his own country.

Ergo, shut up, you pretentious whiner. Gen. Lee was a saintly man who was against slavery—no doubt in contrast to many of your ancestors, black and white, who were slaveholders and slave-traders.

10 posted on 08/13/2013 3:43:00 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I guess this just shows stupid is as stupid does.

Lee opposed secession but felt he had to fight for his state. Lee supported the post-war abolition of slavery and did more than any other prominent Southern leader to reconcile North and South after the War.

11 posted on 08/13/2013 3:44:36 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Yep, and Empire Way was decently prosperous in a blue-collar kinda way. It served as the main thoroughfare between Seattle and Renton, Kent, Auburn and points south. Then they renamed it mlk (jr) way and now it’s....well we all know what happens next. Normal people avoid it like the plague.


12 posted on 08/13/2013 3:44:44 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Picket the NAACP, a racist hate group.


13 posted on 08/13/2013 3:45:54 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"It's a symbol of racism and division ..."

Amen, brother ...

14 posted on 08/13/2013 3:47:03 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

“It’s a symbol of racism and division,” Lee County NAACP President James Muwakkil said”

I have had ENOUGH of about 80% of the blacks in the USA.

If They see racism in any thing or anybody, well then,take a look at me...I have now become the biggest racist alive(with apologies to Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell etc).

As far as ‘division’, where does it say we must live together or get along.

If the USA and whites are so racist, why do the blacks not demand for autonomy....but I think we all know the answer(gibtz me dat)


15 posted on 08/13/2013 3:48:24 PM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Better change the place name to Muwakkil County while they’re at it, huh?


16 posted on 08/13/2013 3:49:32 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Robert E. Lee has a long history of exemplary duty to the US. The civil war found him having to chose between home and country. To suggest that Grant or Sherman or any northern soldier was somehow not racist is stupid on its face. Likewise holding grudges about people who lived in a different time and place. On this idiot’s thinking one should remove Washington and Franklin and Jefferson and a host of other founders from the school as well


17 posted on 08/13/2013 3:55:58 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Or they can come up with a clever sight of hand like was done in King County Washington State:

****************************************************
The county was named after William Rufus King who was Vice-President when the Washington Territory was created.

In 1986 a motion was introduced by Ron Sims (a black Democrat from Seattle), and Bruce Laing (a white Republican from suburban Renton) to change the namesake to Martin Luther King, Jr. No public votes or hearings were taken on the change.

On February 24, 1986, the King County Council passed Council Motion 6461 five votes to four setting forth the historical basis for the renaming of King County in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr.

Because only the state can charter counties, this change was not made official until April 19, 2005, when Washington Governor Christine Gregoire signed Senate Bill 5332 into law.

Council member Larry Gossett shepherded the County Council to a public vote on February 27, 2006 to change the county’s logo from a royal crown to an image of King’s face. On March 12, 2007, the new logo was unveiled.
****************************************************

Martin Luther King Jr. visited King County for two days in November 1961 whereas William Rufus King was a longtime resident.

Also noteworthy is that then Governor Chistine Gregoire (aka Fraudoire) had her operatives steal the governor election from Republican Dino Rossi who won the first two recounts but was defeated by a handful of votes in the last hand recount where mysterious bags of lost ballots suddenly appealed from nowhere.


18 posted on 08/13/2013 4:04:02 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Rebelbase to Lee County NAACP President James Muwakkil: “Go F’ yourself”.


19 posted on 08/13/2013 4:05:14 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Muwakkil sent a letter to Lee County commissioners in early July, asking them to take down the portrait, but they voted to keep it up.

Maybe the Lee County commission should tell Mr. WTF is his name if he doesn't like the idea the Lee County is named after General Lee, you have the option to move...

20 posted on 08/13/2013 4:14:13 PM PDT by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I’d tell him to piss up a rope to his face.Screw these people.Nothing more than communists.


21 posted on 08/13/2013 4:14:26 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The email also cites the county's lack of black department heads and black contractors as more reasons the NAACP wants the portrait taken down.

"This place should be more like Detroit and Baltimore where there are lots of blacks in leadership positions!"

22 posted on 08/13/2013 4:30:00 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Oh, the irony, and plain stupidity of some people. Fortunately General Lee is safe from their obloquies.

It always escapes these race pimp's notice the General Lee had already freed his slaves while Grant still held those he retained through marriage when the two met at Appomattox courthouse.

Idiots.

23 posted on 08/13/2013 4:47:09 PM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Blacks in leadership positions isn’t the problem - its left-leaning blacks that are the root of the problems.


24 posted on 08/13/2013 4:52:43 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

That would be religious bigotry against an angle of the Latter Day Saints....Moroni...


25 posted on 08/13/2013 5:18:35 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

And the hard over leftist whites that support enable and promote them.


26 posted on 08/13/2013 5:19:18 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Prospero

My understanding is the one slave that Grant ever owned, he had freed by 1859.


27 posted on 08/13/2013 5:20:34 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Prospero

Actually Lee never owned the slaves at Arlington. They were the property of Mary Custis Lee, inherited from her father George W.P. Custis upon his death in October 1857.
By the terms of his will, those slaves were to be freed within 5 years of his death. The Arlington slaves gained their freedom in 1862. Grant owned one slave, obtained from Fredrick Dent, his father in law. Grant freed that slave in 1858. Julia Dent Grant had use of 4 slaves from her father. She did not actually hold legal title to them. They remained the property of Fredrick Dent until emancipated in January of 1865 when freed, as were all slaves in Missouri, by Proclamation of the Governor of Missouri.


28 posted on 08/13/2013 5:39:50 PM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: X Fretensis

Minor nit. Grant freed William Jones, the only slave he ever owned, in March, 1859. This was at a time when his family was under great financial stress, yet he basically gave away an asset worth more than a year’s average income at the time.

http://www.american-presidents.org/2007/02/grant-was-slave-owner.html


29 posted on 08/13/2013 6:32:03 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Truth or “right” is not determined by majority vote nor majority emails. That said, if Truth is not relative, why are women, encouraged often vociferously by men, killing the obvious babies in their wombs, and black women to a higher degree?

Why waste time on in-your-face-racism when the baby-lynching supported by the NAACP is killing and harming more blacks than any portrait or packed county government? Go after the real enemy - “ourselves”.

That said, the South lost and the spoils of a lost war go to the victor. Lee is persona non grata officially, no matter local folks’ fondness, just like for the Stars and Bars. Why not replace it with a portrait of King George or Adolf or Romney or McCain or Mondale?


30 posted on 08/13/2013 6:55:28 PM PDT by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

To NAACP: here’s my nose...picket.


31 posted on 08/13/2013 7:00:54 PM PDT by windsorknot (>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

sounds like the NAACP thinks they represent 50% of America and not just 13%.


32 posted on 08/13/2013 8:35:39 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Amazing the NAACP pickets the the representation of the very Party they are a part of; the Democrat slaver Party. The Democrats were slavers then and now; and yet the NAACP began with Republicans and are now Democrat slavers themselves.


33 posted on 08/14/2013 6:32:08 AM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson