Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton 'Needs to Be Deposed Again' to Explain Benghazi
CNS News ^ | 8-13-2013 | Susan Jones

Posted on 08/13/2013 8:10:52 PM PDT by smoothsailing

August 13, 2013

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton 'Needs to Be Deposed Again' to Explain Benghazi

Susan Jones

(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Rand Paul, who famously tangled with then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at a January Senate hearing on the terror attack in Benghazi, says it's time to bring her back before Congress to answer more questions about the terror attack.

"See, the thing is, I think she needs to be deposed again," Paul told Fox News on Tuesday.

His comments came one day after former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova told a Washington radio station that the real scandal in Benghazi is the theft of 400 surface-to-air missiles by some "very ugly people." The Obama administration fears those missiles will be used to shoot down an airplane or blow up one of our embassies, he said.

"I'm concerned about surface-to-air missiles, obviously, being in the hands of Islamic radicals," Paul said, "but I'm also concerned -- was Hillary Clinton telling the truth, or was she simply saying, 'Well, maybe it's classified, maybe I won't tell the truth.'

"I don't think our public officials should come before committee and not tell the truth," Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghaziweapons; fastandfurious; hillarybenghazi; impeachnow; irs; joedigenova; kentucky; randsconcerntrolls; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: smoothsailing

What purpose will it serve? Even the village idiot knows that she will purjer herself each time she gives an answer. In addition, the same idiot knows full well nothing will happen to her. Again, I ask, what purpose will it serve?


41 posted on 08/15/2013 10:11:57 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport

As far as I’m concerned, having her testify under oath serves the purpose of compelling truthful testimony. Committing perjury subjects her to at least the possibility of criminal prosecution in a court of law. That is undoubtedly the reason Rand Paul wants wants to depose her, otherwise why would he bother?


42 posted on 08/15/2013 6:49:33 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

There is the same chance of Hillary being prosecuted for perjury, or any other crime, for that matter is there is of hell freezing over.


43 posted on 08/15/2013 6:55:45 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sport

I wouldn’t be so sure of that, remember what happened to her husband.

In any event, if she isn’t under oath, the temperature in hell won’t matter.


44 posted on 08/15/2013 7:04:23 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson