Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing investigates new flaw with 787 Dreamliner
San Antonio Business Journal ^ | Aug 16, 2013, 7:03am CDT | Mike W. Thomas

Posted on 08/16/2013 2:02:26 PM PDT by SgtBilko

Boeing Co. has suffered another setback with its 787 Dreamliner after the model’s biggest operator, ANA Holdings, says it discovered wiring defects in the fire-suppression system on three aircraft.

(Excerpt) Read more at bizjournals.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 787; boeing; dreamliner
Another flying fire cracker made by the unionized socialists on WA state.
1 posted on 08/16/2013 2:02:26 PM PDT by SgtBilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SgtBilko
Not entirely the union's fault, although I'm not lettig them off as fault-free. To manage the program, Boeing brought in some Ford executives to manage the program. A friend of mine, a former CEO of a local firm, interviewed for a management position on the project. He didn't get it. He told them they were treating it as a "just in time" project when it should really be treated as a "six sigma" project. He was right.
2 posted on 08/16/2013 2:08:30 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtBilko

Sounds like the Flying Volt..............


3 posted on 08/16/2013 2:29:07 PM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Rename the plane to the nightmareliner.

I used to laugh when McDonnald brought it its 2 engine flying cigar and dubbed it the M-80. I don’t think planes should be named after fireworks but what do I know. So, perhaps in reverse fashion, this one is the nightmareliner.


4 posted on 08/16/2013 2:34:50 PM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SgtBilko

Make these babies into amusement ride already.. damn thing is Hugh!


5 posted on 08/16/2013 2:37:00 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Maybe each one should have one of these on board................

6 posted on 08/16/2013 2:40:11 PM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
"Boeing brought in some Ford executives to manage the program."

Going the other way seemed to work (Alan Mulally). An airliner is more complex and lower volume and you sell the prototypes. Building parts for it worldwide with more vendors than Boeing had managed previously is a recipe for trouble.

7 posted on 08/16/2013 2:45:33 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
I thought is was the MD80.

The M-80's I had as a kid are worked to my specs.

8 posted on 08/16/2013 2:47:12 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
I thought is was the MD80.

The M-80's I had as a kid all worked to my simple specs.

9 posted on 08/16/2013 2:47:51 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Some travel agent I used to employ called them the M-80, perhaps the term was interchangable? Yeah, the M-80 I had as a kid worked fine, right out of the box. Went to Mexico one time and found some M-240s and managed to get them over the border...they really worked fine, would actually nudge a buick from 25 feet!


10 posted on 08/16/2013 2:52:10 PM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SgtBilko

If it’s Boeing, it’s not going.


11 posted on 08/16/2013 4:13:27 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
To manage the program, Boeing brought in some Ford executives...

One of their rejected redesign concepts...

12 posted on 08/16/2013 4:16:45 PM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SgtBilko

So... Fix it...


13 posted on 08/16/2013 5:50:15 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtBilko

Looks like we need to change the name from Dreamliner to Nightmareliner.


14 posted on 08/16/2013 5:55:13 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

I don’t wanna sit in one of these planes. Just imagine a birdstrike into a engine during take off and the fire supression blows out the wrong engine. A nightmare. These birds should get grounded until they checked and fixed every 787 ever built.


15 posted on 08/17/2013 11:58:56 PM PDT by SgtBilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson