“You think Romney would have pushed the gay agenda, obamacare and amnesty to the same reckless, whole-hearted degree as Obama??”
The man who said he would be ftter for the homos than Ted Kennedy? The man who had illegals working at his house and only ditched them because he got caught?
And that complete and total idiocy is why the rest of his record mirrors Obama.
When you compare the two, Romneys was far worse than Obama’s before Zero ascended. That’s a died in wool/carved in stone fact. So if every other example in history is anything to go by, he would have been just as bad, perhaps in different ways. But if that’s all you got to hang your hat on, it just proves them mess this is.
Voting for evil gets more of it. Period.
re: “Voting for evil gets more of it. Period.”
But, you see, that’s just the point. Every candidate is evil to a certain extent. That’s the “degree” part I spoke of. So, you are always voting for what you perceive to be “less evil” in a candidate.
Of the republican candidates or independent candidates who ran for president in 2012 - which one was not evil in your opinion?
And, a follow-up question, at what point do you decide a candidate is not “evil” enough to avoid voting for them?