Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

Since this is a case under the Alien Torts Statute then I highly doubt the First Amendment applies/is relevant.


12 posted on 08/21/2013 11:35:26 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gdani

Here’s something I picked up on ATS Wikipedia:

“...This statute is notable for having allowed U.S. courts to hear human-rights cases brought by foreign citizens for conduct committed outside the United States. However the Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that the Alien Tort Statute does not apply to corporate defendants nor conduct which occurred outside of the United States, in the case of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum.[1]”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_Tort_Statute

It’s hard to believe this will go much further, since Lively was in Uganda. I wonder if his ministry is incorporated.


18 posted on 08/21/2013 12:29:56 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: gdani; tsomer

Agreed. The Fed judge is just disregarding the new SCOTUS decision, but it really does cut the legs out from under SMUG’s jurisdictional argument. What the Ugandan parliament decides to do legislatively after taking testimony from a US evangelist is between Ugandan leadership and their people, at least as far as our judiciary is concerned. Especially when Lively argued for greater leniency than what that parliament finally came up with.


20 posted on 08/21/2013 12:56:24 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson