Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inclusion Means Excluding White Males
Townhall.com ^ | August 22, 2013 | Mike Adams

Posted on 08/22/2013 10:52:31 AM PDT by Kaslin

Dear Chancellor Miller:

On May 9, you announced that you were initiating a process to "rethink" our university's approach to diversity and inclusion. Then, on August 16, you announced that eleven individuals agreed to serve on your Chancellor’s Committee on Diversity and Inclusion. For the following reasons, I find the composition of the committee to be deeply problematic.

1. Your inclusion committee is 0% white male. I have written three books dealing with campus diversity issues. I have been invited to speak on issues of diversity (largely ideological) at 78 college campuses. Over the last ten years, I have written nearly 900 columns, the majority of which have dealt with diversity issues. I am certainly among the most qualified people you could have invited to serve on your diversity committee. But you did not reach out to me. There is but one explanation for this. You have deliberately excluded white males from your discussions of inclusion. If there is a non-racist or non-sexist explanation for the fact that your committee is 0% white male, I'd like to hear it.

2. Your inclusion committee is 82% female. Over a decade ago, our school launched, at taxpayer expense, a new Women's Resource Center. It was strange, given that the student body was then 68% female. Put simply, we need to stop pretending that women are a minority here at UNC-Wilmington. If you want to be inclusive then you should include more men on your inclusion committee. Men are the real minority here at UNC-Women Everywhere.

3. You need to be sensitive to religious diversity. If you do a little quick research on RateMyProfessors.com you will find something interesting. There is one professor you placed on the committee who teaches in the area of religion. A student recently accused him of grading students down for "answering too religiously." The anonymous accusation doesn't amount to guilt. But ask yourself whether Professor Burgh would be on the committee if he were even once accused of race or gender insensitivity, instead of religious viewpoint discrimination. Then think about why this country was established. It wasn't founded on principles of racial or gender identity politics. It was founded on principles of religious freedom.

4. One cannot support both inclusion and domestic terrorism. Bill Ayers was an education professor who used to make pipe bombs for the purpose of blowing up his political enemies. He stopped doing that when some of his fellow domestic terrorists blew themselves up in the process of making one of the pipe bombs. Just a few years ago, one of our education professors signed a petition in support of Ayers, the unrepentant domestic terrorist. You have now placed that professor on the inclusion committee. Of course, we should all agree that blowing up one's political enemies tends to run contrary to the spirit of tolerance and inclusion that you wish to promote. So I would respectfully suggest that you should have appointed a professor who opposes domestic terrorists, rather than one who publicly supports them.

5. There are no white students on your committee. There are two Hispanics and one black student on your committee. One works with El Centro Hispano. One works with the Black Student Union. Oddly, however, you don't have any white students on the committee who also work with the White Student Union, which, of course, does not exist. That's probably why you excluded white students from your efforts to be inclusive. You didn't want any white students asking tough questions like "hey, where's the white student union?" Or "where is El Centro Gringo?"

Your announcement letter continues, saying "We must not waiver in our commitment to create a diverse and inclusive campus environment. I believe most of us agree there is much more to be achieved in these areas." This is just nonsense, Gary. What you are saying here is that you think most people agree with you that there should be more spending in the area of "diversity and inclusion." But you only arrive at such conclusions because people who diverge from your opinion are excluded from your committees, and your circle of influence. That is how bad decisions are made. You should ask students if they are willing to suffer through more tuition increases to fund further expansion of diversity initiatives and see what they say. But make sure you don't exclude all white students from the survey like you excluded them from the committee.

Your letter concludes with your assertion that "It is extremely important that this be a fully transparent and inclusive process." Does this mean you will let me attend the first meeting of your new Chancellor's Committee on Diversity and Inclusion? Additionally, will you let me ask tough questions and publish the committee's answers in my weekly column?

If you won't answer my last two questions in the affirmative, then I ask that you at least be honest about what you're really up to, here. In that case, you could just hang a sign outside your meetings saying "Inclusion in Progress: No White Males Allowed."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: academia; affirmativeaction; discrimination; diversity; homosexualagenda; inclusion; leftismoncampus; males; mikeadams; preferences; racism; sexism; whites

1 posted on 08/22/2013 10:52:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Any university’s commitment to academic excellence is inversely proportional to the power of the “diversity” committee.

Come on, libs, you know it’s true.

So don’t come on with any of your bull Obama trying to negate one of the basic truths of the multiverse.


2 posted on 08/22/2013 10:56:11 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin



3 posted on 08/22/2013 10:57:38 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey (Block Captain..Tyranny Response Team / al-Kilab Division)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Of course, we should all agree that blowing up one's political enemies tends to run contrary to the spirit of tolerance and inclusion that you wish to promote.

That's going to leave a mark!

4 posted on 08/22/2013 10:57:49 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Diversity and Inclusion are just liberal code words for racism, classism, sexism and bigotry.

And this is happening at a college campus? (Cue the “I’m Shocked” Renault poster.)


5 posted on 08/22/2013 10:58:35 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

That pic would be much more accurate it is showed the folks living in govt subsidized housing, with Obamaphones, EBT cards, and Medicaid.


6 posted on 08/22/2013 11:00:09 AM PDT by nascarnation (Democrats control the Presidency, Senate, and Media. It's an uphill climb....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider; Apple Pan Dowdy; BatGuano; Battle Axe; bayouranger; bboop; BenKenobi; Biggirl; ...

Mike Adams Column


Please Freepmail me if you want to be added, or removed from the ping list

7 posted on 08/22/2013 11:01:22 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

it’s a prophetic... Post Gubment Crash image....


8 posted on 08/22/2013 11:02:09 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey (Block Captain..Tyranny Response Team / al-Kilab Division)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

4. One cannot support both inclusion and domestic terrorism. Bill Ayers was an education professor who used to make pipe bombs for the purpose of blowing up his political enemies. He stopped doing that when some of his fellow domestic terrorists blew themselves up in the process of making one of the pipe bombs. Just a few years ago, one of our education professors signed a petition in support of Ayers, the unrepentant domestic terrorist. You have now placed that professor on the inclusion committee. Of course, we should all agree that blowing up one’s political enemies tends to run contrary to the spirit of tolerance and inclusion that you wish to promote. So I would respectfully suggest that you should have appointed a professor who opposes domestic terrorists, rather than one who publicly supports them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

OK, now here’s where I AGREE with the libtard educrat. We SHOULD put as many wack-off professors who want blow up other wack-off professors on the Diversity and Inclusion Committee as possible.

The more the merrier. Go for it.


9 posted on 08/22/2013 11:02:27 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Of course they know it’s true, but they will deny it however


10 posted on 08/22/2013 11:02:42 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bump

There should be a Mike Adams at all campuses


11 posted on 08/22/2013 11:03:49 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good letter but you might as well ask a savage to read Shakespeare.


12 posted on 08/22/2013 11:04:02 AM PDT by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Umm...maybe the only way the includees can excel is if they don’t have to compete academically with white males? Just wondering.


13 posted on 08/22/2013 11:04:30 AM PDT by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Waiting for the CWC (Congressional White Caucus).

Also waiting for local White interest, heritage, and community defense groups to spring up. It will happen eventually... It has to in this climate.

14 posted on 08/22/2013 11:05:02 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

:: Then think about why this country was established. It wasn’t founded on principles of racial or gender identity politics. It was founded on principles of religious freedom. ::

Booo YAH!


15 posted on 08/22/2013 11:08:59 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

You are correct, Unfortunately there isn’t :(


16 posted on 08/22/2013 11:09:58 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I can’t wait to read the chancellor’s reasoned response.


17 posted on 08/22/2013 11:10:55 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Then, on August 16, you announced that eleven individuals agreed to serve on your Chancellor’s Committee on Diversity and Inclusion....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The first order of business of this committee is to chose a name for the committee. They all agreed:

Diversity and Inclusion Committee Knowing About Developing Strategies.

DICKWADS.

DICKWADS will be meeting every third Thursday in the library. If you would like to meet with the DICKWADS, please contact Shoneeqa Mohammad-Garcia or his wife Barney “Lil Barack” Washington.


18 posted on 08/22/2013 11:12:14 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Keep on dreaming if it makes you happy, but you know that will never happen


19 posted on 08/22/2013 11:12:28 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Keep on dreaming if it makes you happy, but you know that will never happen

The CWC, yeah, that's a dream. As to the rest, if there isn't an eventual white backlash, there won't be any future in being white in America.

20 posted on 08/22/2013 11:13:56 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I remember the scholarship offered a few years ago ...it was very specific....it was only for “Native Americans, Pacific Islanders, African Americans, Middle Easterners,Southeast Asians, Chinese, and Latinos”....didn’t really want to come out and say..”just no whites” so they had to list every single group....


21 posted on 08/22/2013 11:16:01 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Diversity means including everyone*

(*who agrees with us. Not you, conservatives... or christians or jews.)

22 posted on 08/22/2013 11:17:35 AM PDT by Mr. K (Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Whites need to exclude this school from their list of choices for a good education.


23 posted on 08/22/2013 11:18:26 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
there will be a future for whites in America...if you're not an elite...like a college political science teacher...or a doctor or lawyer, you job will be at the lowest tier...

I think now blacks have a preposterously huge number of govt jobs and I think this will only get worse....

of course the latinos flooding our nation will give them a run for the money.....maybe it'll be fun just to sit back and watch...

24 posted on 08/22/2013 11:18:59 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

“I can’t wait to read the chancellor’s reasoned response.”

The letter will simply be ignored while efforts are made to entrap the poster in wrongdoing or forcibly remove him from campus as “dangerous” under whatever they can cook up. Traditionally, the Soviet Marxist had their enemies declared “insane,” so I would expect that approach. Or perhaps nebulous allegations that he makes people feel “uncomfortable” or “threatened” without any specifics.

You see, in a campus with free-flowing ideas and concepts, only government-approved thought and comment is actually allowed.


25 posted on 08/22/2013 11:20:27 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cherry
I think now blacks have a preposterously huge number of govt jobs and I think this will only get worse....

Many government jobs were a stable, low-paid dumping ground for the incompetent in the past. As the power and size of government has increased, as public sector unions have increased their grip, and as minority preferences have become anti-white policies, our former public servants have increasingly become our minority masters. And, they love the power they have.

26 posted on 08/22/2013 11:23:05 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Wow, a scholarship was actually available to every racial group imaginable EXCEPT whites?

How could that not be considered racist? Have the leftists become so blind?


27 posted on 08/22/2013 11:24:27 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The diversity cult is all about suppressing actual diversity. White males are seen as resistant to that program.

To understand what the Left means by promoting "diversity," see Understanding "Diversity".

You will never understand what has been going on, unless you trace this attack on the uniqueness of people, back to those who have promoted it over the decades. It combines fanatic egalitarianism with the quest of those, who hate the nation concept, for "World Government. It explains the Leftist slant on immigration; some of the more bizarre aspects of our foreign policy; and the one size fits all approach to education.

What it is not is altruistic or idealistic. Surrendering heritage is not an ideal to any decent or reflective person. And that means any decent or reflective person, regardless of their diverse heritage. It is not about better relations between nations, tribes or communities; it is all about reducing resistance to building a human equivalent to an ant hill. (Incidentally, it is basically the approach that Stalin employed after World War II to stamp out resistance in the Baltic States & the Ukraine.)

William Flax

28 posted on 08/22/2013 11:28:16 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Colleges are socialism in action. They are all headed by socialists. They have been able to put all their marxist wishes into action. Distribution of wealth. Taking money from the productive and giving it to the indolent or politically connected.

Tuition is extremely high. But only the sons of rich White people pay full tuition. On the other end, the lesbian Spanish-speaking Black Religion of Peace transgender pays nothing.


29 posted on 08/22/2013 11:29:05 AM PDT by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

This is true. Just as, with the coming exclusion of whites from any voice in power, policy-making, or governing, in this country and globally, the whole world will be variations of Detroit, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Haiti, etc. The only thing which will mitigate this will be Asians, particularly the Chinese, filling up the power vacuum at the very top of the power structure, and all those who are left (if whites are extinct by that time) can rest assured that they carry no equivalent of “white guilt”, far from it.


30 posted on 08/22/2013 11:38:26 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m confused about something: In point 1, Mike says there is 0% white males on the committee, then in point 4 says Bill Ayers is on the committee. Last I checked, Terrorist Ayers is a white male. Did I miss something?


31 posted on 08/22/2013 11:42:01 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (It wasn't the Rodeo Clown's act, it was the crowd reaction they could't take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
That's going to leave a mark!

Perhaps not. The left, and their minority tools, have no sense of shame, and no moral standards, therefore no sense of hypocrisy for not living up to ethical standards which they don't claim to have. The only reason they even pay lip service to ethics is to hold conservatives, who do have ethical and moral standards, to those standards, every jot and tittle of them. They themselves not only have no shame in having none, they are proud to show they have none, as long as it doesn't hinder their agenda. These days, it doesn't, as their low-info constituents also have no shame in having none (ie, generational welfare leeches gaming the system, illegal aliens demanding rights citizens can't claim, etc).
32 posted on 08/22/2013 11:46:46 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gspurlock
No maybe about it, or their one resort wouldn't always be to look for more and more ways to handicap white males, instead of meeting the higher standards themselves. Of course, when they know that nature has handicapped them, but their overblown sense of self-esteem won't allow them to admit that, they will always find ways to scapegoat whites for what is a mere fact of nature.
33 posted on 08/22/2013 11:51:55 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
... Did I miss something?

Yes. In point 4 Mike said a professor that admired Bill Ayers was on the committee.

34 posted on 08/22/2013 11:53:17 AM PDT by ken in texas (The Obama motto: If the weather's nice let's play golf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

“Have the leftists become so blind?”

No, they have ALWAYS been that blind. From day one. Their ability to hide it is necessarily slipping.


35 posted on 08/22/2013 11:56:11 AM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Or globally. Whites are the minority globally already. Others are racing to white countries in order to be nearer to their “oppressors” whom they kicked out of their own countries, which then reverted to the mean, so they can overwhelm their white oppressors in their own countries until they turn those historically white countries into the third world hellholes from which they fled.

Hurray, once whites are extinct in those countries, the whole world can be a third world hellhole except for the pockets where their Chinese overlords, who harbor not a shred of “Asian guilt”, will live.


36 posted on 08/22/2013 11:57:54 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ken in texas

Yes, thank you. I tripped over the pronoun, my fault. I was surprised because Mike is usually dead on with his facts and logic.


37 posted on 08/22/2013 12:04:11 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (It wasn't the Rodeo Clown's act, it was the crowd reaction they could't take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Please keep up with the class. He wrote that a professor who *supported* Ayres was on the committee.


38 posted on 08/22/2013 12:07:34 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
" So I would respectfully suggest that you should have appointed a professor who opposes domestic terrorists, rather than one who publicly supports them is one"

There... fixed it.

39 posted on 08/22/2013 12:09:34 PM PDT by Mr. K (Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ouch! that’s gonna leave a mark!


40 posted on 08/22/2013 12:11:54 PM PDT by Mr. K (Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan

“The diversity cult is all about suppressing actual diversity. White males are seen as resistant to that program.”

If truth be told women and minorities did not “liberate’ themselves or force their way into the workforce. They were LET in by the same WM that are routinely attacked as bigoted. WM have accomidated virtually EVERY reasonable request for access and have gotten NO credit. On the other hand once women and minorities get hiring power they rarely hire white guys.


41 posted on 08/22/2013 12:20:51 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Terrorist Bill Ayers is not on the committee. Read closer.


42 posted on 08/22/2013 12:29:59 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Yes, thank you. It was pointed out to me a couple of times...


43 posted on 08/22/2013 12:46:55 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (It wasn't the Rodeo Clown's act, it was the crowd reaction they could't take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude
But you see, the women & minorities have been "gamed," as it were. They imagine that they have a grievance. The Left is now, and always has been about grievances, sometimes real, but usually imaginary--if you put all the facts into context.

Take women. Feminism is the enemy of the feminine woman. It brutally plays on their insecurities, but basically diverts them from the areas where they have a natural advantage, to competing in the areas where they are at a natural disadvantage. It is all about irrational anger at human differences that are real.

Again, the Left is not about anything altruistic or idealistic. It is all about a war on the realities of existence. (Compassion Or Compulsion?)

If you look closely at the Leftist answers to supposed problems, they are never grounded on actual human experience; always driven by wish lists, never reason.

William Flax

44 posted on 08/22/2013 1:19:47 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson