Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

“What is there to discuss? He admits he did it. Go back to the jury room, order a couple of pizzas, have lunch and them come back with the verdict.”

My thoughts exactly.


5 posted on 08/23/2013 6:30:59 AM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: MplsSteve

Here’s why: if they did that, even basing it on his admissions, those admissions weren’t under oath and are not evidence. I guarantee the appellate defense counsel (appeal is mandatory with any punitive discharge or dismissal) will say, “He didn’t get due process! What, they listened to HIM? He’s NUTS!” And the court might just buy it.

No, they need to deliberate in the most serious sense of the word, so there will be nothing the court martial panel did, or failed to do, that will allow this scum to avoid the maximum penalty for his heinous conduct.

Colonel, USAFR


11 posted on 08/23/2013 6:34:40 AM PDT by jagusafr (the American Trinity (Liberty, In G0D We Trust, E Pluribus Unum))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson