yes we can .. yes we can .. yes we can .. yes we can .. yes we can .. yes we can .. yes we can .. yes we can ..
Many years ago there was research showing that newborn babies respond more to their parents language than to foreign languages. The conclusion was that the unborn baby was accustomed to the rhythms of outside speech, in spite of having heard it only in very muffled form.
The original study was doen with French and Russian, both Indo-European languages. Probably the effect would be greater if comparing more dissimilar languages, such as English and Chinese.
Does this strike any one else as child abuse? Of course babies hear in utero - why wouldn't they? I wonder what the long term effect of in utero torture will be on those kids.
Has Planned Unparenthood denounced this study yet?
L. Ron Hubbard told us this decades ago.