Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Every Top Republican Invited to MLK Anniversary Event Said No
Mediaite ^ | 08/30/2013 | by Matt Wilstein

Posted on 08/30/2013 6:55:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Conservative commentators have had a lot to say over the last 24 hours about the fact that Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), the only African-American in the Senate, was not invited to yesterday’s March on Washington 50th Anniversary celebration. According to Bill O’Reilly, it was strange that “no Republicans and no conservatives were invited” to the event. As it turns out, that’s just not true.

As the Washington Post’s Ed O’Keefe reported today, “not a single Republican elected official stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on Wednesday.” But it’s not because they weren’t invited. While Scott’s office has confirmed that the senator was not invited, many of his senior colleagues were.

Here’s a run-down of the top Republicans who were invited to the March on Washington anniversary event, and why they reportedly decided not to show.

The Rev. Leah D. Daughtry, who served as executive producer of the commemoration, told the Washington Post’s O’Keefe that her committee began inviting members of Congress to attend four or five weeks before the event.

“We had a very concerted effort, because this is not a political moment. This was about us coming together as a community, so we wanted to be sure that we had all political representations,” Daughtry said. “We attempted very vigorously to have someone from the GOP participate and unfortunately they were unable to find someone who was able to participate.”

[photos via House.gov, Senate.gov]



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: barackmailingamerica; extortion; gop; martinlutherking; pantsontheground; race; republicans; walkingaroundmoney; whosyerdaddyjackson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: TBP; mickie
"(the rally) not a political moment"

"Pantalones en fuego!"

For the language-challenged, this means "pants on fire, as in "Liar, Liar."

LOL, spot on.

Leni

41 posted on 08/30/2013 9:08:24 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret
The Dark Side of Martin Luther King Jr. Communist Associations – FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover had long been suspicious about potential influence of Communists in social movements such as labor unions and civil rights. Hoover directed the FBI to track King, and the SCLC, in 1957.

This was in no small part spurred by King and four others attending a May 1, 1957 meeting at the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The institution, founded in 1932 and still operating today, is billed as having “facilitated the great change in our society” of racial integration on its website.”During the 1950s and ’60s it trained civil rights workers in law, nonviolence, community organizing and other techniques of social change,” its website says.

MLK speaking at the Highlander Folk School in 1957 However, the FBI correctly identified it as a Communist front which sought to bring about a Marxist revolution in America, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). In speaking at the Highlander Folk School, King praised the school for its “noble purpose and creative work” and for having “given the South some of its most responsible leaders in this great period of transition.” He then predicted that, through concerted nonviolent action, “the future is filled with vast and marvelous possibilities” and concluded, “this is a great time to be alive.”

King was accompanied to the Highlander Folk School by Myles Horton, Aubrey Williams, Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. Their meeting laid the groundwork for initiating demonstrations and riots across the Southern states.

Stanley Levison (Lower Left) at a 1966 SCLC meeting with MLK In 1962, FBI investigators learned that one of King’s most trusted advisers was New York City lawyer Stanley Levison. The FBI found Levison had been involved with the Communist Party, USA. The FBI had observed his alienation from the Party leadership, but it feared he had taken a low profile in order to work as an “agent of influence” in order to manipulate King, a view it continued to hold despite its own reports in 1963 that Levison had left the Party. Another King lieutenant, Hunter Pitts O’Dell, was also linked to the Communist Party by sworn testimony before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC).

The Bureau received authorization to proceed with wiretapping from Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy in the fall of 1963 and informed President John F. Kennedy, both of whom unsuccessfully tried to persuade King to dissociate himself from Levison. Although Robert Kennedy only gave written approval for limited wiretapping of King’s phones “on a trial basis, for a month or so”, Hoover extended the clearance so his men were “unshackled” to look for evidence in any areas of King’s life they deemed worthy. The Bureau placed wiretaps on Levison’s and King’s homes and office phones, and bugged King’s rooms in hotels and motels as he traveled across the country.

For his part, King adamantly denied having any connections to Communism, stating in a 1965 Playboy interview that, “there are as many Communists in this freedom movement as there are Eskimos in Florida” and claiming that Hoover was “following the path of appeasement of political powers in the South.” Hoover’s concern about communist infiltration of the civil rights movement was meant to “aid and abet the salacious claims of southern racists and the extreme right-wing elements.” In that same interview, however, King advocated that Blacks and other “disadvantaged” Americans be financially compensated for “historical wrongs.” According to Wikipedia, King set the bill at US$50 billion in 1965 dollars, and the amount be doled out to all people who have been disadvantaged, not only African-Americans.

Hoover did not believe King’s pledge of innocence and replied by saying the civil rights leader was “the most notorious liar in the country.”

After giving his “I Have A Dream” speech during the August 28, 1963 March on Washington, the FBI described King as “the most dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country.” In December 1963, the FBI stated King was “knowingly, willingly and regularly cooperating with and taking guidance from communists” whose long-term strategy was to create a “Negro-labor” coalition detrimental to American security. Levison did have ties with the Communist Party in the past in various business dealings, but the FBI refused to believe its own intelligence bureau reports that Levison was no longer associated in that capacity.

Bayard Rustin, an African-American Quaker and avowed homosexual and advocate on behalf of gay and lesbian causes, was a member of King’s circle and was a member of the Young Communist League, joining in 1936. In 1941, he became disillusioned with the CPUSA because it abandoned civil rights work in favor of trying to get the American government to aid the Soviet Union from German Nazi invasion. While Rustin began working with “anti-Communist Socialists” (an oxymoron) such as A. Philip Randolph, the head of the “Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters”, he later attended the 16th annual convention of SCLC in February 1957 and founded the SCLC with King a month later.

The SCLC was front-loaded with Communists as well. Its vice-president the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund. That group’s field director, Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, who went on to become Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young was trained at the Highlander Folk School. - See more at: http://www.therightperspective.org/2011/01/11/the-dark-side-of-martin-luther-king-jr/#sthash.wSx4ZWco.dpuf

42 posted on 08/30/2013 9:15:56 AM PDT by boxlunch (Psalm 94)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Sen. Tim Scott was invited.

From the very first sentence of the excerpt:
Conservative commentators have had a lot to say over the last 24 hours about the fact that Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), the only African-American in the Senate, was not invited to yesterday’s March on Washington 50th Anniversary celebration.

43 posted on 08/30/2013 10:06:50 AM PDT by FreedomOfExpression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They thought John McCain was a “top Republican”.


44 posted on 08/30/2013 10:08:21 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

I’ve heard people say those things, but I do not know if they are true, outside of the womanizing that is.

King was an honorable man because he meant what he said. You can hear it in his voice still to this day.

I respect him for that.

The people who spoke at those rallies are stinking liars who don’t mean a word they say, and neither do I.

They are disgusting.


45 posted on 08/30/2013 10:13:15 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When one lays down with hogs one ends up smelling like them.


46 posted on 08/30/2013 10:17:13 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It looks like the 20 thousand or so believers managed to trash the place anyway. So I don’t blame anyone with conservative stripes from getting that mess rubbed off on themselves.


47 posted on 08/30/2013 10:22:04 AM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Sen. Tim Scott was invited.

Yes, he received a form letter, just like every other member of Congress and the Senate did.

In fact, an article that I read earlier today said that his "invitation" to attend, not to speak, incorrectly addressed him as "Representative Scott", rather than "Senator Scott".

48 posted on 08/30/2013 10:32:49 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: chris37; boxlunch

Look at post 42 and then get back to me.


49 posted on 08/30/2013 10:33:48 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bob

RE: In fact, an article that I read earlier today said that his “invitation” to attend, not to speak, incorrectly addressed him as “Representative Scott”, rather than “Senator Scott”.

That obviously was a half-hearted invitation...


50 posted on 08/30/2013 10:34:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It would only have created a Paul Wellstone moment.


51 posted on 08/30/2013 10:35:40 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

P.S. Con men usually do sound “sincere.”


52 posted on 08/30/2013 10:36:05 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Granted that Blacks vote Democrats by a huge margin, but by not going, the Republicans might be re-enforcing the message already ingrained in the heads of many Americans — THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE.

Exactly. Which is why the refusals were irresponsible at least.

Blacks desperately need to hear the conservative message. When we refuse to tell it to them, we feed into the worst caricatures of conservatives. A moment to celebrate true color-blindness is tailor-made for that message. If they don't even have the courage to stand up and say that legalized segregation was wrong fifty years ago, why should any blacks listen to our plans now?

Prop 8 in California ought to have showed us that there's a group of blacks willing to at least listen to us. Unfortunately, the GOP-e can't be bothered to make that case. They're afraid of a little hard work, which should surprise nobody.

We can't continue to be the party of white people only. If we don't start significant outreach, we'll never win another national election again.
53 posted on 08/30/2013 11:07:52 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; ...
GOP Official: March on Washington Organizers Ignored Suggestions (ABC News)

Excerpt from above article:

Miscommunication and lack of coordination appear to have played a role in at least some of the invites not going out to Republican office-holders. Event organizers say they assumed Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., couldn’t attend, based on a failure to RSVP to an earlier, more general invitation. But his office says he was never actually invited to speak, and he may have been able to attend if he was formally invited.

More than half a dozen different prominent Republicans were invited to speak, but several of the invitations went out quite late in the planning. All sent their regrets...

54 posted on 08/30/2013 11:12:14 AM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in Peace, FReeper Extraordinaire Doctor Raoul...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret; chris37

Sorry about the post in red, I don’t know how it happened - I just cut and pasted from an article so maybe I included a random HTML code.

I didn’t know about all this regarding MLK either, I had grown up thinking his motives were pure. I was pretty shocked and disheartened when I read more about him.

But I have read/learned SO much about the Communist party infiltration of the USA from the 30s through the 60s. When I read Witness by Whittaker Chambers, the Venona Files, Blacklisted by History, etc and watched the documentary “Grinding America Down” I realized there was a ton more to history that I hadn’t been taught at school.

It’s no good putting someone up on a pedestal if they really don’t belong there (and very few do, but especially anyone connected in any way with the CPUSA).


55 posted on 08/30/2013 11:36:16 AM PDT by boxlunch (Psalm 94)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: highball

Rather than attending and giving honor to a man associated with the communist party, conservatives need to honor truly great men such as Ben Carson, Clarence Thomas, etc.

And I don’t agree that we should honor men just because they are black and famous, but honor them along with others who are making contributions to society, whether white/Caucasian, black , Asian, etc. Otherwise we are stooping to their racists levels.


56 posted on 08/30/2013 11:39:59 AM PDT by boxlunch (Psalm 94)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: boxlunch; nanetteclaret

Ok.

I’ve been educated where I was not before. It does seem he is not the man I thought he was, so I must withdraw my description of him as an honorable man.

I cannot stand behind those who support communism.


57 posted on 08/30/2013 12:35:58 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: chris37

FR is a learning experience for all of us! I’m getting some of the history and political education I never got in high school or college. It’s hard to not become cynical sometimes when you find out the truth about so many things that had been taught differently!


58 posted on 08/30/2013 12:56:54 PM PDT by boxlunch (Psalm 94)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: boxlunch
It’s hard to not become cynical sometimes when you find out the truth about so many things that had been taught differently!

Believe me, it was taught differently when I was a kid (graduated H.S. in 1956, college in 1961). It started changing when my kids were in school (the mid-to-late 70's).

59 posted on 08/30/2013 1:13:12 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason
More than 9 out of 10 blacks will surely vote for a Democrat now.

Ya think? That would mean the GOP would nearly double their support of this demographic over the last election.

60 posted on 08/30/2013 1:59:41 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson