Posted on 08/30/2013 12:02:15 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
And you have long ago lost whatever mind you may have ever possessed.
You are most certainly the legend in your own mind.
I don’t think you are stupid but, age has addled more than your mind.
I do not know what he once was, but he is currently very stupid. I can't recall ever having seen more inane and childish ranting than what this kook puts forth. The closest second place kook in my experience was "Squeeky Frome". At least SHE was kicked off Free Republic for being a kooky loon.
She's still out there ranting in internet land, but fortunately we no longer have to notice her.
Kansas58's sole argument is the fallacy of false authority. That's it. He has nothing else.
Squeeky Frome?
OMG!!!!
I remember that loon.
Hey, I don’t mind arguing particulars but, this guy ain’t right in the head.
Do not let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
In the real world, few things and few solutions are really perfect.
So, losers like you are against anything that works.
Yes, you promote a losing strategy based on your own personal need to feel superior, which makes YOU a loser.
Your idiotic legal theories have less support now than you had a year ago.
You consider yourself some kind of intellectual giant, but the more people study these issues, the more they turn against you.
Putting aside the continuous sophomoric personal attacks that have nothing to do with anything of any real importance, your argument falls apart on the idea that legislation which violates "you shall not commit murder," and "we hold these truths to be self-evident," and "to secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity," and "No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law," and "no State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," is somehow "good."
After you given all that up, in the name of your "clever" strategy, what, pray tell, do you have left that argues against the practice of human abortion?
That's what I think too. We joke about this or that person being "nuts", but in this case I think there really is some sort of psychological problem.
A rational person would try to protect as many lives as possible.
It is not rational to believe that a total ban on abortion could happen anytime soon.
YOU are PROABORTION since you refuse to take steps that would end millions of abortions.
YOU EV HAVE BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS, YOU ARE KILLING BABIES BY YOUR ARROGANT REFUSAL TO FACE REALITY!
Again, putting aside your grotesque personal attacks, I have to say that your Utilitarian arguments, while still not being moral or constitutional arguments, would have more weight to them if there was any evidence that you’re “saving some.”
But, on the contrary, all the evidence points to the fact that your continued sellout of the only decent moral, constitutional and legal arguments against abortion have for forty years accomplished nothing except to assure the continuation of abortion on demand.
Abortionist George Tiller's 2nd opinion “Doctor” Abortionist has been forced out of the abortion business due to laws restricting late term abortions and requiring such second opinions.
This has saved COUNTLESS lives.
You “no compromise” types opposed the laws that have put MANY abortionists out of business!
The POINT, the STRATEGY, is to lay legal “land mines” and “traps” whereby abortionists can be charged with crimes or whereby abortionists can be sued in Court.
The POINT is to make it unprofitable to be an abortionist.
That you oppose such a WORKABLE and OBJECTIVELY SUCCESSFUL strategy indicates that you, EV, are simply an attention seeking egomaniac who cares NOTHING about actually saving any lives at all.
Your personal attacks are so far over the line as to be laughable.
But, in any case, all they have to do is go up the road to the nearest mass murderer. I really don’t know why you find this so hard to understand.
Our unalienable rights are not supposed to be protected by travel inconvenience. They are required by the supreme law of our land to be equally protected by our laws.
But the incrementalists like yourself keep passing laws that grant “legal” permission to kill all the babies, as long as they are murdered according to your arbitrary schedule, and by your rules.
Which continues to assure the heinous practice of abortion on demand.
It’s really very simple.
There is a reason that nobody is following you.
You have no clue where you are going.
And you do? LOL...
Anyhow, I’m not looking for followers. You’re completely mistaken.
Bump
Ted is proving himself this evening/morning Ping!
Cruz is eligible to be President.
If you disagree you are an idiot.
If you think that Anyone has any authority over this decision, other than the States and the Congress, then YOU are anti-Constitution!
The Courts have NO power under our Constitution to rule on the eligibility of any candidate for President.
LOL
Go away.........
Everything I posted is TRUE!
You are a LIBERAL in so much as you think that the Courts should settle such matters in this Country.
The Courts have NO power, under the Constitution, over eligibility issues.
NONE!
Republicans need not worry about being embarrassed when Cruz debates Hillary or Biden. If I didn’t detest both of them so much, I could almost feel sorry for whichever commie loser gets that chore.
“If we allow the democrats and the GOP-e statists to select our next opposition candidate for us, ie, Chris Christie or Jeb Bush, this nation is kaput.”
AMEN and AMEN!
Cruz was champion debater at Harvard. It shows in interviews on TV & Radio.
If some one is not a naturalized citizen, he/she is a natural born citizen due to parental citizenship status. If one was born to an American mother during a safari in African, one is a natural born citizen.
So quit the in fighting and work on the big picture of getting behind a conservative who can win.
Get over yourself.
Are you seriously this pathological and so self possessed that you need to re-litigate a post from a month ago?
Yes, absolutely I will bend anyway possible to avoid a leftist democrat winning the WH in 2016. I am pragmatic. Not a head-strong and obstinate person full of ego.
IMHO only 3 GOP candidates have the intellectual capacity, charisma and ability to debate MSM on their feet. Cruz being one of them. So I am not going to tie myself in knots over his eligibility. If Obama was deemed eligible by the powers that be, I have zero problem with Cruz’s eligibility.
Yap, that self deprecating humor was the Gipper’s strong suit. Cruz, the champion debater from Harvard, should try to cultivate that quality. Cruz is however on a much higher intellectual level than Reagan, so there is that compensation.
The tirade prompted me to donate to SarahPac and, hopefully, help remove Peter King from Congress.
PS: Get well soon, Jim
While at Princeton, he competed for the American Whig-Cliosophic Society’s Debate Panel and won the top speaker award at both the 1992 U.S. National Debating Championship and the 1992 North American Debating Championship.[26] In 1992, he was named U.S. National Speaker of the Year and Team of the Year (with his debate partner, David Panton).[26] Cruz was also a semi-finalist at the 1995 World Universities Debating Championship.[27]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz
I congratulate Ted on his graciousness in respecting his elder and inferior, withholding fire and promoting his own talking points instead.
If the good Senator had let BO'R have it with both barrels, it would be like shooting fish in a barrel.
It would be like Bill Buckley debating Rachel Jeantel.
You are The Master, Old Sarge....we give the perfect set-up, you never fail to come right back with the perfect punch line.
Bravo!
I can't stop laughing......
Leni
Senator Cruz is the kind of conservative that brings joy to
the libs. He ignores Ronald Reagan’s 11th commandment not to
speak ill of fellow Republicans,some of whom now label him
a fraud. Cruz’s obvious placement of personal political goals
above country, is becoming clearer every day.
Sadly, in 2016, Cruz is likely to be strong enough to knock
off Rand Paul in the primaries,and with the 2 of them both
bloodied, open a path to saddle us once again with another make believe conservative in the mold of a Romney or McCain.
The person you addressed this post to is the site owner. He is currently in surgery and might respond after he recovers.
He would not likely agree with your perspective, though.
Oh, and welcome aboard.
“That he will renounce his Canadian citizenship and has not addressed his Cuban citizenship
ought to be note worthy.”
************
I guess the question becomes does he have Cuban citizenship? Do you know?
https://sites.google.com/site/ajustice999/cuba/cuban-constitution—chapter-ii—citizenship
Ok, while insulting, that is pretty funny and I'm going to use it.
Hmmm., I’ve heard a lot of the “My way or the Highway” mantra lately....
Is not this site funded by donations?
Dialog, even when unpleasant, is valuable and should be encouraged, not stifled (I agree ad homenim attacks notwithstanding).
I personally believe NBC is more than what a corrupted SCOTUS, or a federal law states. NBC means just that, not derived from some act of will or act of law based on a flawed interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
Ted Cruz, in my opinion, like Mitt Romney and Obama, does not meet the NBC criteria of being born to two parents, both citizens, natural or naturalized, at time of his birth, within the jurisdiction of the US.
Sorry, but the principle of Occam’s Razor applies.
If you dislike my opinion, based in the understood definition of international law of the day (of the Constitution)and decide to ban me for it, go ahead.
Be kind enough to send me a note though, otherwise you’ll be acting like “them”...
Both law and SCOTUS opinion are changeable, the wording of the US Constitution is not.
Anyway, I like Ted, too.
I just refuse compromise any longer, after all, it is only our republic at stake.
Regards;
Fortunately, Ted Cruz is NOT like Romney or Obama. Ted Cruz is a genuine pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-drilling, pro-constitution, small government, big defense Reaganite conservative and carries the blessings of the grassroots conservatives. In short, he’s exactly what we on Free Republic are looking for in a president. Also, fortunately, as he was born to a fully qualified U.S. citizen working in Canada, he’s a natural born citizen. Those who know me and love Free Republic and all that we stand for will appreciate all of the above. Our highway is the straight and narrow one. You can walk with us or not, Your choice. Thank you very much.
I agree he all the above except a NBC. I doubt that is enough for us to be other than friendly, unless you make it so(acid test).
Why can we not find a man or woman who has two American parents to run for POTUS? Are we that European these days?
Okay, I’ll do it, but you’ll have to convince my wife.
If anyone thinks Cruz or Paul or Lee etc will get a GOP nod in two years, your are smoking something.....
Regards;
Dittos!
Cruz is my guy. Anyone who can get McAmnesty in such a fit is the perfect candidate! NO MORE RINOS!
Vote for the lesser of two evils. Give money only to candidates you actually like. Man, if I didn’t vote for the lesser of two evils, I could end up almost never voting!
Well, now that the precedent’s been set I guess a donkey could pretty much be “president”! :O
I would fully support Ted Cruz as president from the knowledge I have now. May God bless him and protect him and watch over us and give us strength to return to freedom and to him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.