Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoCalTransplant
My guess is that this move is to allow them to “mend fences” with other long shore unions up and down the west coast, to try to coordinate a massive strike when the Tijuana docks come on line.

Good guess. My take is that either they do it before the Tijuana port can handle the volume or they'll lose.

16 posted on 09/01/2013 8:43:27 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers choices: convert, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

If you are talking about the Porto Colonet Project, that is on “Hold”, and likely dead-in-the-water.


19 posted on 09/01/2013 10:08:53 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

Pretty much. With all the corruption in Mexico, the port owners and shipping companies still hesitate to move all the business, but the more of a PITA that the ILWU becomes the more attractive it is.


41 posted on 09/02/2013 9:14:23 PM PDT by SoCalTransplant (Wake me when we get to the part where we alter or abolish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson