Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yldstrk

“America cannot afford another conflict that taxes our resources without achieving goals that advance American interests, and I will not support authorizing military action against Syria at this time.”


This is all fine and very righteous and such but would this guy say the same thing about Iran’s nuclear weapons use in the near future—that use of such against a neighbor like, say, Saudi Arabia would not really stunt the “advance” of American interests so let ‘em use their bomb—??

As I’ve said before, even a minute before Flight 10 hit the tower it was easier to argue that nothing going on in Afghanistan engaged “American interests.” But then Americans had to choose whether to burn to death or jump 89 floors.


17 posted on 09/02/2013 6:24:46 AM PDT by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: PaleoBob

apples and oranges, paleo

use your crystal ball


21 posted on 09/02/2013 6:37:31 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson