Skip to comments.U.S. intelligence agencies involved in chemical attack in Syria
Posted on 09/02/2013 10:58:41 AM PDT by DTA
Meanwhile, the media has spread new proofs of the U.S. intelligence involvement to chemical attack near Damascus. Hacker got access to U.S. intelligence correspondence and published U.S. Army Col. ANTHONY J. MACDONALDs mail. Macdonald is General Staff Director, Operations and Plans Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence the Army Staff. Its about chemical attack in Syria.
In the message August 22 Eugene Furst congratulates Col. on successful operation and refers him to Wasington Post publication about chemical attack in Syria. From the Anthonys wife dialog with her friend its clear the video with the children killed in the chemical attack near Damascus was staged by U.S. Intelligence.
(Excerpt) Read more at my.telegraph.co.uk ...
Sad that we have to go to the Daily Mail, and Telegraph to get news about the US, but it is the very first paper I read in the morning.
Hm. I thought this story was ‘discredited’.
Our US Intel Agencies have lost all credibility.
James Clapper, head of NSA was caught red handed lying to congress
and the American people.
It was! Obama came out and said it was not true. That the US is in no way involved in setting things up to give us an excuse to go to war and replace Assad with the Muslim Brotherhood. Honest
Astounding. WIFE-INT reported via the Brits' open source.
Obama tricks the US military into winning Jihad for Al Qaeda, The Muslim Brotherhood and helps establish the global caliphate.
I would just caution that this a blog by an unknown contributor. It may or may not be true. Worth considering, but not certain.
It wouldn’t really surprise me—but it’s not a real article in the Telegraph newspaper.
Nobody uses propaganda to the degree the people in the Middle-East do, and I'm not convinced the media sleuths are capable of avoiding all the pitfalls.
If it does turn out to be true, I will be angry about it. I'm just not going to jump on this bandwagon until every bit of it has been vetted.
In his latest Ramirez covers:
Syria Denies Using Chemical Weapons
This is proof!
The proof needed to impeach Obama.
The proof that will see him convicted of a War Crime.
Even the Daily Telegraph has minimum journalistic standards for the rag that it is, and wouldn't use terms like
"Under the circumstances the U.S. is ready once again to violate international law..."
Without some evidence.
Even if this is NOT true, Obama (Kerry, Biden, Clinton, Rice, etc) have so ruined America’s reputation in the world, it will be believed the US had a hand in the attack.
Heck, I believe it could have happened. I do not trust the govt of Obama.
So they lie to Americans and Congress,
but IGNORE the Boston terrorists BEFORE THE FACT.
Meanwhile, they lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie
and set WMD to al Qaeda. This cannot end well.
They're pikers compared to this administration.
This is not proof....newbie.
This “source” isn’t even from the Telegraph. It was posted on a blog site hosted by the Telegraph. The sourcing on FR Syria threads has been extremely loose over the past week. One post sourced the Tehran Times. When I questioned that they offered a second source. The second source was from the Russian Times website!
They're about as reliable as the New York Times.
Thick Fog out there!
LOL, can you really call it propaganda when it gets to that level?
I suppose it is, but the scope and volume, it just seems underwhelming to reference it as propaganda.
I noticed another post mentioning the blog aspect of this. I agree that’s way too sketchy for posting here. We need to hold our people accountable, but we shouldn’t always jump to the worst possible conclusion. That was my emphasis.
May not be proof, but is as substantial as the “youtubes” Obama is using as proof.
Notice how we have yet to see any cannister or bomb fragments.
As reliable as the NYT doesn’t make them worth passing along their disinformation.
Poor sourcing makes for a poor argument.
After all, a Dem is in the WH, not a Repub. Also, they recognize it for what it probably is: the spread of disinformation designed to confuse people and muddle the issue, something our Dem-controlled media are well-versed at.
Or no argument at all.
It's progress. Up until about a year ago, we had to go to Pravda.
And can point to doodoo you don't even know exist.
Where do you want to start?
Providing WMD to Saddam?
Training of AQ in Afghanistan ?
Working hand in hand with Iranians to bring AQ to Bosnia?
Or training KLA and staging massacre in order to justify attack Serbia?
The role of U.S. trained Bosnian AQ in 911 and Madrid?
How about offing Ghadafi after he decided to rout AQ out of Libya?
I guess you got to the party too late. I forgot more than you'll probably ever know.
When I see the pattern, I know where to dig.
Here is a pebble trail for you: search who controls those who paid for Odumbo's campaign. Search for the real boss of Samanta Power, the U.S. Ambasador to U.N.
A more likely scenerio is that the terrorists got chemical weapons that were left unguarded in Libya, or even given to them by the MB in Egypt. There are other similar plausible scenerios.
Obama's administration would've had at least a shred of believability if they had addressed those possibilities and the possibility that rogue soldiers in Assad's army did this.
We all know what happens when mac daddies lips are moving, lie, lie and more lies.
If it’s in the Daily Telegraph, you can be sure it’s not true.
This is the UK’s answer to WorldNetDaily
One thing is clear, we don’t know the truth about anything in Syria, or Benghazi for that matter.
There was another report that Hillary had turned down requests for gas masks from the Syrian rebels.
(excerpt from Breitbart article)
Almost three months ago, we received intelligence information that the regime forces may use chemical weapons in Homs, said Abo Saleem, the directing commission secretary of the Council of Homs Province and a member of the political bureau of the Revolutionary Council of Homs, in an interview with The Daily Beast. I forward the information to the State Department telling them we are afraid of the use of chemical weapons by the regime and we need gas masks and some training to prepare for such an attack. I got no response. Two weeks after that, the regime used chemical weapons in the old city of Homs, as we were expecting. We sent the State Department reports, but nothing happened.
I haven't bothered with the state-run American newsrooms in over a decade. The foreign press is the only way to go. There's a reason Hillary whined about a "right wing conspiracy" so long ago. It was because she and the rats and their newsrooms suddenly came to the realization that their monopoly on the selection, disssemination, and spin of the daily news was over, and the truth could no longer be spiked or twisted with abandon.
I would expect that if 1500 people were killed by a nerve agent, there would be at least three times that many wounded by it. Where are they? Not everyone would get a lethal dose.
What did Obama know and when did he know it?
I think they say there are survivors in fact, 3 times? I don’t know the math.
The sad thing it that wise people have no reason to believe it’s not true.
Google Britam Defence Syria sarin
Files from Britam Defence Ltd. server are available on numerous sites online. It is known for at least 5-6 days but MSM keeps silent and Kerry continues to tell lies. AQ terrorists now claim their release of Sarin was by accident due to mishandling (!) The question is - why they stockpiled Sarin in the first place? Who armed terrorists with WMD?
Now it is known. Saudi chief of Intelligence used Britam to get WMD into AQ Al Nushrah Front hands and they used it.
How reliable is this information?
More than BBC using Iraqi footage to claim atrocity in Syria.
Or John Kerry who is on record falsifying his own war experience and receiving money from AQ affiliated terrorists for presidential campaign.
If they were staging the kids for the post attack, they would like have been staging evidence for the UN inspectors to collect later
I hate to say this but how can you believe anything that our gubmint says anymore? Sometimes I feel like they are the real terrorist!
Whoever wrote this not has poor mastery of the English language
“This is proof!”
“If its in the Daily Telegraph, you can be sure its not true.
This is the UKs answer to WorldNetDaily”
I don’t know if I’d go that far. The Telegraph broke the story of CIA operatives running weapons from Benghazi to al Queda. But you’re right to be suspicious of everyone and everything.
Ouch!! Should have said “note” but now it’s way too late.
BRITAIN allowed firms to sell chemicals to Syria...the UK Government has been allowing the sale of these ingredients to Syria...The chemical export licences...were only revoked six months later, when the European Union imposed tough sanctions on Assads regime...The Government...granting licences to companies to export to regimes such as Syria.