Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

And just what would they strike that would absolutely remove the threat of chemical weapons from Syrian government hands and from jihadist hands?

No one has offered a plan that relates to US security interests.


3 posted on 09/02/2013 5:44:56 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

This is a mess. There is something to be said for not tolerating the chemical weapons use...but this administrations’ (and especially Kerry) most serious attempts to create a foreign policy face with Assad has been to Neville Chaimberlain with Assad. Then to feed the Al Queda weeds on the other side, as he has, just created more bad situations.

Even if there could be a right side to this, is there any reason for either or any side to believe that this administration will be willing to do more than flail?


16 posted on 09/02/2013 6:19:22 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
No one has offered a plan that relates to US security interests.

You don't automatically trust the word of Barack Hussein Obama and John McCain? They were the top two Presidential candidates in 2008, surely they know what they are doing!

(was that too sarcastic?)
27 posted on 09/02/2013 6:40:27 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson