posted on 09/04/2013 1:44:17 PM PDT
“We have to pass the resolution so you can see what’s in it”
posted on 09/04/2013 1:44:59 PM PDT
(According to Dick Lugar, I'm a "random outlier." Woo Hoo!!!!)
A vote for this is a vote for WW3.
posted on 09/04/2013 1:46:03 PM PDT
(A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
Go ahead Nan. Some of us would like to see if the hypocrisy of the democrats in the House knows any bounds.
posted on 09/04/2013 1:47:44 PM PDT
To: John Semmens
Thought this was one of yours.
posted on 09/04/2013 1:48:34 PM PDT
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
Alan, please don't make me have to use this . . .
Interesting article, but seriously, “Pelosi” and “whip” do not belong in the same sentence...
posted on 09/04/2013 1:50:02 PM PDT
by gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
They know they have the Senate.
The fight will be in the House.
With Boner and Red Nancy in charge, I hold out very little hope.
posted on 09/04/2013 1:50:07 PM PDT
by Old Sarge
(Opinions are like orgasms: only mine count, and I couldn't care less if you have one...)
"Were in a situation where were not going to do anything thats going to do any good, Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) said Tuesday in an interview with CNN. No one in the administration says this will cause regime change, this attack thats being contemplated. No one in the administration is even saying it will prevent Assad from using chemical weapons again.
Theres no contemplation that any attack that we launch will end the civil war. I feel bad about it, Grayson added, but sometimes you have to recognize your own limitations. Otherwise, its hubris.
Pelosi is so f***ing nuts, she makes Alan Grayson sound sane.
posted on 09/04/2013 1:50:10 PM PDT
(Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
Nancy has been in the House since 1987. I wonder if there was a similar authorization of force vote after Saddam used VX gas on the Kurds in '88?
posted on 09/04/2013 1:53:12 PM PDT
by Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
Her Troops?! Isn’t weird how the ANTI-WAR LEFT sure loves to use military terminology when it suits them.
posted on 09/04/2013 1:56:20 PM PDT
by Eagle of Liberty
(Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
Pelosi is trying to determine which democrats are to be sacrificed at the
alter of WW3.
posted on 09/04/2013 2:06:53 PM PDT
(Stop Worrying And Just Learn To Love The Bomb!)
posted on 09/04/2013 2:07:53 PM PDT
(The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
Pelosi underwent an electroencephalogram.
Nothing was found. Literally: nothing.
posted on 09/04/2013 2:14:47 PM PDT
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
Implications, implications about women and children as victims. If that doesn’t work, the issue of rape is used to convince Democrats in favor of military action (see Bosnia).
posted on 09/04/2013 3:39:02 PM PDT
Pelosi scrambling to ensure the killing of Syrian Catholics and the endengerment of Israelis by the Jihadis she is supporting
posted on 09/04/2013 3:41:39 PM PDT
I’m absolutely stunned, in disbelief, at what these Dems are doing in shoving more war down America’s throats...all to save “face” for Obama? I shake my head in disbelief. This defies all logic and sense of reality. Unbelievable!
posted on 09/04/2013 4:18:58 PM PDT
Hey Republicans - vote Present!
The Dems want this war, let 'em have it - all to themselves.
posted on 09/04/2013 4:34:33 PM PDT
(Palin was right (again)!)
The senate will vote first and approve it. This will tell them who has to vote “no” in the house.
posted on 09/04/2013 4:47:11 PM PDT
(".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson