Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Army sends warships to Syria
Aporrea ^ | 09/05/2013 | Correo del Orinoco

Posted on 09/05/2013 4:03:33 PM PDT by CMB_polarization

[translated by google] 05-09-13.-The army of China on Thursday sent warships to the Syrian coast to observe the actions of U.S. vessels. UU. and Russia as tensions grow before a military attack against Syria. According to the Russian news website Telegrafist, the Chinese army sent Jinggangshan amphibious ship was seen sailing in the Red Sea to the Suez Canal. The report indicates that the vessel was not sent to participate in an action of aggression but is there to observe the actions of the U.S. warships. UU. and Russia. No clutch Jinggangshan equipped for fighting. The report also notes that additional warships Chinese Army have been sent to the region. China on Thursday hardened its rhetoric on Syria, President Barack Obama warned that "military action would have an impact negative in the global economy, especially driving up oil prices. " Source / Telegrafist Translation / Ivana Cardinale for the Correo del Orinoco


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia; Syria
KEYWORDS: china; evilempire; iran; lebanon; navy; obamareckless; plan; russia; sovietnavy; sovietunion; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

1 posted on 09/05/2013 4:03:33 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

“Made in China”....Not to worry....


2 posted on 09/05/2013 4:04:51 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization
http://telegrafist.org/2013/09/04/83711/

Despite the fact that the political decision to send warships, apparently, it was decided a long time, we know about it is just now from unofficial sources. Thus, the Chinese military blog that specializes in articles about military equipment the United States, Russia and China, said that several Chinese ships already close to the shores of Syria, citing its sources in the PLA.

The authors openly admit that the ships would not be in any way involved in a potential conflict, but only observe the actions of NATO and Russian ships.

What kind of ships were sent to the coast of Syria is unknown. Meanwhile, the social network Vkontakte citing a confidential source was reported that a Chinese ship Jinggangshan project was seen when passing the Red Sea toward the Suez Canal.

"2:00 this pepelats back among us in the direction of the Suez Canal. Board number 999. Speed ​​14 knots, judging therefore has specific instructions to be at some point. We are now in the Red Sea somewhere in the center, "- wrote the author.

By tail number is later found out that this is a Chinese amphibious assault ship dock Jinggangshan, which can carry on board a landing craft air cushion or other bulky loads.

Recall that, according to several sources in Syria might be Chinese counterparts S-300 systems. Meanwhile, this information officially confirmed no one, and the Chinese amphibious ships were seen in the ports of Syria.

3 posted on 09/05/2013 4:04:58 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

4 posted on 09/05/2013 4:05:32 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization
Chinese Army sends warships to Syria

Does the Chinese navy know?

5 posted on 09/05/2013 4:06:30 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

We will be giving them an advanced look at any electronic devices we use. They will analyze those devices and figure out ways to jam them. This is one of the many reasons that any attack should have been anouced AFTER it was over.

BTW, any attack or actions on the part of the US in Syria are a BAD idea. Who would have thought I’d agree with Putin on anything?


6 posted on 09/05/2013 4:06:37 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
http://www.tienphong.vn/hanh-trang-nguoi-linh/644734/Trung-Quoc-phai-chien-ham-toi-gan-Syria-tpod.html

China to send warships near Syria?

TPO - A military source specialized articles about military technology of the United States, Russia and China, based on the PLA source informed a number Chinese warships toward the coast of Syria.

The source also added that the warships will not participate in the potential conflict in any way, but only observe the actions of NATO and Russian warships.

It is unclear what the Chinese warships have been dispatched to the Syrian coast. Meanwhile, social networking Vcontact cited confidential sources of information has emerged a Chinese warship project Jinggangshan (Jinggangshan) was detected when passing through the Red Sea to the Suez Canal.

"Two hours before the ship passed us in the direction of the Suez Canal. The number of ships of 999 slopes. Speed ​​14 knots, not much longer would have the specific information. We are currently in the Red Sea, apparently at the center "- author said.

According to the ribs and then was able to clarify this is surface warships versatile amphibious Jinggangshan (Jinggangshan) of China, can be transported by landing craft air cushion or the goods of large size.

According to information from many sources, in Syria might Version owns the air defense missile system modeled on the system of the Russian S-300 produced by China under the name HQ-9. The information is not officially confirmed, but the Chinese lander has not been detected in the port of Syria.

Do Ngoc Inh

(According Commentary Military, Russia)

7 posted on 09/05/2013 4:08:10 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

Oh boy, the clown needs to go.


8 posted on 09/05/2013 4:08:44 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

LPOP’s


9 posted on 09/05/2013 4:08:47 PM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

10 posted on 09/05/2013 4:09:15 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

11 posted on 09/05/2013 4:09:20 PM PDT by McGruff (Strange times are these in which we live..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

Maybe Obama can start World War III?


12 posted on 09/05/2013 4:10:44 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

9 is a lucky number to Chinese. 999 even moreso. They appear to be sending dual-purpose craft capable of assisting civilian evacuations...you know...if our bombing of Syria’s chemical weapons releases (gasp!) lethal clouds of chemical vapors...as well as vessels able to monitor SIGINT.


13 posted on 09/05/2013 4:12:09 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

WWI was started over something just as stupid as this.


14 posted on 09/05/2013 4:12:20 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy. :^)


15 posted on 09/05/2013 4:12:44 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

16 posted on 09/05/2013 4:15:49 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

The pool is getting crowded. Everyone’s coming to the party.


17 posted on 09/05/2013 4:16:28 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

“The authors openly admit that the ships would not be in any way involved in a potential conflict, but only observe the actions of NATO and Russian ships. “

Is the author the CO also? How does he know this? Silliness to believe such a thing because the author can’t make that call. The Chinese military can decide to act if they chose to - should that time come. And I do not think they owe their strategy to the newspaper.


18 posted on 09/05/2013 4:16:51 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

That ship is mighty vunerable without a task force with it...

Could it be the Chinese are adding what they can to Putin’s “Red Line”?


19 posted on 09/05/2013 4:17:35 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Ricky Nelson? Oy vey.


20 posted on 09/05/2013 4:19:15 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

Nice. It looks so new that this might be its maiden voyage.


21 posted on 09/05/2013 4:20:12 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

Just waiting to hear the news of foreign warships parked off of the east and west coasts of America.


22 posted on 09/05/2013 4:20:28 PM PDT by bayliving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization
Seems like the Med is getting crowded.

5.56mm

23 posted on 09/05/2013 4:21:05 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
WWI was started over something just as stupid as this.

*************************

Yes. It's frightening.

24 posted on 09/05/2013 4:22:02 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

Back off, Obama, this isn’t going to end well.


25 posted on 09/05/2013 4:22:37 PM PDT by madison10 (I miss America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Thanks again, Obama. NOT!


26 posted on 09/05/2013 4:22:39 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
Seems like the Med is getting crowded.

I remember helping "plot dots" during war games in the 90s. The Med is always stupid crowded. It was kind of like trying to have a laser tag fight in a mall at Christmas time.

27 posted on 09/05/2013 4:25:25 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
Wonder if anyone is using underwater drones that mimic Russian subs.

Imagine being in command of a US Destroyer and getting false readings of Ivan surrounding you.

The homo moslem CIC is pathetic.

Saab — yes, Saab — has built an amphibious drone meant to keep submarine crews on their toes.

The Saab AUV62 is a highly sophisticated autonomous underwater vehicle that mimics a submarine, allowing navies to train for anti-submarine warfare as realistically as possible without blowing up expensive submarines.

Though it’s an unmanned vehicle, the AUV62′s unique acoustic payload means it will show up on sonar screens as an enemy sub. It’s essentially the underwater equivalent of skeet shooting, except with torpedoes.

According to Saab, the battery-powered AUV62 can either be preprogrammed to follow a particular underwater route, using collision detection to avoid other vessels, or a remote operator can control it using either a radio or acoustic link. It can travel at speeds as fast as 20 knots, and it can descend to more than 1,640 feet below the surface. It’s possible to launch the AUV62 from the shore, from a submarine, or from a ship — as shown above.

Though several military customers have already ordered AUV62s for anti-submarine target practice, the undersea Saab has abilities other than getting blasted out of the water during training missions. Depending on how it’s configured, it can be used for minesweeping and reconnaissance. The Swedish military has already deployed the AUV62 for such purposes

- See more at: http://auvac.org/community-information/community-news/view/2084#sthash.oyM16e7o.dpuf

28 posted on 09/05/2013 4:25:34 PM PDT by Rome2000 (THE WASHINGTONIANS AND UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE ARE THE ENEMY -ROTATE THE CAPITAL AMONGST THE STATES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Maybe Obama can start World War III?

That would take everyone's mind off Benghazi and the other scandals.
29 posted on 09/05/2013 5:00:39 PM PDT by Deo volente (God willing, America shall survive this Obamanation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Chinese Army sends warships to Syria

Does the Chinese navy know? (^_^)

Actually I think all of the armed forces of the PRC are considered part of the "Peoples' Liberation Army", so bizarre as it seems, the description of the action given in the article is correct.

30 posted on 09/05/2013 5:02:21 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bayliving

Remember that missile test a couple years ago off the Southern California coast?


31 posted on 09/05/2013 5:05:42 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

I suppose something was lost in translation but wouldn’t that be the Chinese NAVY? Don’t want to put too fine a point on it but where would the Chicoms land an amphibian in the ME? Another story that probably requires the BS flag be thrown, wiped, and stuffed in the appropriate orifice of the writer.


32 posted on 09/05/2013 5:15:48 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If the Homo starts WWIII, the left would find a way to blame W and Cheney.

Paraphrasing another leftist idiot: “The only way to find out what’s in a war is to start one.”


33 posted on 09/05/2013 5:21:39 PM PDT by bkopto (Obama and Biden are merely symptoms of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cherokee1

I’d imagine that the Chinese have filled the hold with as many different kinds of surveillance equipment as they could find. If Obama gets his way, the Chinese could get info about not only US systems, but NATO, Russian, Israeli, and Iranian ones because everyone will light up when those missiles get launched.


34 posted on 09/05/2013 5:25:02 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Their navy, the ‘People Liberation Army Navy’, has a name that makes you go, “Huh?”

Kinda like a major political party in Canada (federally from 1942 - 2003 and still named that way in the provinces) called the ‘Progressive Conservative Party’... “Huh?”

Now that they have a ‘blue water’ navy, if they separated the navy from the army and created a group like the Marines, would that group be called the’People Liberation Navy Army’?


35 posted on 09/05/2013 5:25:40 PM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was lost but now I'm found; blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Not in any way involved with the potential conflict”

Uhh, ok. Given there are so many ships in the area, who is to say an unfortunate accident won’t occur? I guess the Chinese would be less than amused should one of their ships end up struck.


36 posted on 09/05/2013 5:34:12 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Power disintegrates when people withdraw their obedience and support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

Is this our next war? A shooting war in the Med with China and the Soviets?? America is going to be in deep trouble. Our only defense against both of them are nukes.


37 posted on 09/05/2013 5:46:42 PM PDT by RetiredArmy ("As in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of Man." Come Quickly LORD Jesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
PS to my above post. This is an excerpt from an article I read earlier this week. Interesting stuff:

If humanitarian reasons were enough to intervene in a sovereign nation’s affairs, why aren’t we attacking North Korea or China? You know the answer. The Russians and Chinese possess formidable weapons technology and the willingness to use them. The Chinese have an overwhelming cyber-attack capability. So too, they possess cutting edge satellite-killing orbital weapons and space-based weapons platforms. Of interest, some Chinese satellites have altered orbits recently amazing and concerning US defense experts.

The Chinese have also perfected super-sonic, ship-killing missiles that even US aircraft carriers can’t evade or defend against. The Russians have similar anti-ship missile capability, top-notch anti-aircraft and anti-missile systems combined with the most advanced military aircraft in the world. They’ve also developed a super-cavitating torpedo that creates a gas bubble in front of the fired torpedo, which allows for much greater speed than a conventional torpedo. Notice a pattern here? Speed kills in the combat environment.

The US currently has no known defense against these weapons. Our current anti-missile systems can’t lock onto and destroy these Russian and Chinese missiles. They’re too fast. We have had some success with prototype laser missile interceptors but nothing’s ready to be deployed. Thus, the US Navy is extraordinarily vulnerable to such attacks.

I don’t have to remind you of the respective Chinese and Russian nuclear capabilites. Let me make a bold statement here. I don’t think Obama would authorize a nuclear counter-strike in the event of a nuclear attack on the US. (Just my opinion.) We’d absorb the strike without a response. I have no information to suggest this, it’s just a gut feeling I have.

Yet one way or the other, the US is determined to attack Syria. By the way, any attack on Syria will precipitate an attack on Israel by Syria, Iran and Hezbollah. Israel will respond, possibly bringing the destruction of Damascus as described in Isaiah 17. Don’t worry about Israel. They will be okay. Once Israel realizes that God is their true security, and beseech Him, He will answer.

Russia too, is reported to be ready to attack Saudi Arabia in retaliation. The US and world economy will be destroyed, no matter what else happens.

That’s the plan. That’s what this is all about. Obama cares nothing about this country. His job is to destroy it. I can’t say it more clearly.

You might be thinking that we’re the US, we’re the world superpower, and somehow we’ll prevail. Realize that a nation’s greatness depends on the providence of God. We are an arrogant, proud people who defy God with our wickedness. Do you think God will grant victory to a military and nation that openly praises homosexuality? To a President who pushes Islam and attacks Christianity at every chance? To a formerly Christian nation that relies solely on its own perceived might?

Does this madness make any sense? It does to Satan and those who further his agenda. The ultimate goal is subjugation of the entire world under one man: the Antichrist. Syria is the linchpin. It’s where the escalating conflict starts. The rest of this year will be very interesting.

An individual that I know, a person (in the know), is particularly concerned about an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack. An EMP would destroy such things as computers, utilities, communications and transportation. We would effectively be pushed on a technological level back to the 1890s. A blue ribbon panel appointed by Congress came to the conclusion that such an attack would see 90% casualty rate in the US within 18 months after the event.

If my friend is concerned, it’s something to consider. Read up on EMP effects.

Some would like to believe these sold-out deceivers, as they come on television and plead with us to believe their lies just one more time. The same people that lie about Benghazi, the IRS targeting Obama’s enemies, the NSA spying on every American, and the Justice Department tapping reporters phones and computers. How about operation Fast and Furious selling guns to Mexican drug cartels so that the Obama Administration could point to gun violence in Mexico to justify gun control in the US?

This administration has amply proven that they’ll lie, cover-up and shed blood to further their plans. To them, dead bodies are only useful props.

Beware another false flag event. If they don’t get the desired public opinion turnaround to go ahead with attacking Syria, they might just pull off another, more spectacular provocation. Of course those who perpetrate such things are also in charge of the ensuing investigation. How convenient.

As example, this past week Secretary of State John Kerry was caught using a photo from 2003 Iraq, claiming it pictured the victims of the chemical attack last month. That photo was identified for what it was and promptly removed from Kerry’s “evidence.”

Bungling incompetence or another willful lie? As Hillary would say, what does it matter? We know the character of these people. I believe nothing they say. Absolutely nothing.

38 posted on 09/05/2013 5:57:59 PM PDT by RetiredArmy ("As in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of Man." Come Quickly LORD Jesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

Sound like we are getting all the ingredients for Armageddon.


39 posted on 09/05/2013 5:58:34 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Daymn, Ricky Nelson looks like Jack Lemmon in that picture! (And jack looks like Ricky!)


40 posted on 09/05/2013 6:00:53 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

And dingle Barry wants to get rid of them.


41 posted on 09/05/2013 6:01:39 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization
Ground to a Halt (Research shows: Suicide-bombers Communists, not Islamists
New York Times ^ | August 3, 2006 | ROBERT PAPE

Posted on Wed Aug 9 01:23:46 2006 by GodGunsGuts

...

In writing my book on suicide attackers, I had researchers scour Lebanese sources to collect martyr videos, pictures and testimonials and the biographies of the Hezbollah bombers. Of the 41, we identified the names, birth places and other personal data for 38. Shockingly, only eight were Islamic fundamentalists. Twenty-seven were from leftist political groups like the Lebanese Communist Party and the Arab Socialist Union. Three were Christians, including a female high-school teacher with a college degree. All were born in Lebanon.

...

Robert A. Pape, a professor of political science at the University of Chicago, is the author of “Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism.”



Iran is also communist, by the way (everything state-owned and much of it doled out to the families of clerics). I posted hundreds of articles on Iran and the need to take care of business there a long time ago, but anti-American, pecuniary, international socialist interests here threw trash in threads at nearly every article. Iran continues to build nuclear weapons.

42 posted on 09/05/2013 6:09:48 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization
"According to the Russian news website"

The site behind the new Iron Curtain.

US authorities arrest and kidnap Russian citizens worldwide
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3063058/posts


43 posted on 09/05/2013 6:12:50 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

Jeez North Korea must be getting jealous with all the attention on Syria. Maybe time for another nuke threat?


44 posted on 09/05/2013 6:20:42 PM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization
Russia to be neutral in possible Iran-US armed conflict
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1618125/posts

China will stay out of it, too. We have twice the carrier groups needed to take both nations.

Writing on the wall for Iran [Even the UAE and China agree.]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1616282/posts

Chinese official holds nuclear talks with Iran - report
http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/afx/2006/04/16/afx2672672.html


45 posted on 09/05/2013 6:27:06 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Does the Chinese navy know?

It is called the People's Liberation Army Navy.

46 posted on 09/05/2013 6:49:30 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Speaking to the Chinese Captain: That thars a mighty nice new ship. Be a shame if something were to happen to it. It’s a long way home with a broke ship.


47 posted on 09/05/2013 7:31:27 PM PDT by Redcitizen (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

Red China is trying to intimidate us, and can’t take us yet. But it is still a bad sign.


48 posted on 09/05/2013 7:32:28 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Do they have a PLAN?


49 posted on 09/05/2013 7:34:35 PM PDT by Redcitizen (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

Aside from the small matter of who would win in a USA vs. China cat&dog fight, there is the other factor that most everything used in the USA is either wholly or has components made in China.

For instance, the U.S.Military buys “Made in USA” electronics stuff which have key components made in China.

And China will continue to send the USA the technology items the USA needs but no longer makes?

Rightttt....


50 posted on 09/05/2013 7:54:47 PM PDT by OldArmy52 (The question is not whether Obama ever lies, but whether he ever tells the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson