Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mouton

At least a positive here...two hundred of the cruise missiles used up. He’ll have to move the military budget up a notch by the end of the year to replenish them. Course...if the Russian umbrella takes down half of them....it might trigger some harsh talk at the Pentagon over ‘what next’?


13 posted on 09/06/2013 11:31:10 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

It is unfair of us to have any cruise missiles. Any new procurement will be for any or all Muslim countries.


57 posted on 09/06/2013 12:08:57 PM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice

“He’ll have to move the military budget up a notch by the end of the year to replenish them.”

Why????
Clinton didn’t, after he burned up the inventory attacking Serbia.

The lack of cruise missiles was a major reason why the start of the War was delayed so much after 9/11, allowing the left to ramp up the Anti-Bush campaign (We now know it had NOTHING to do with anti-war).


64 posted on 09/06/2013 12:13:57 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice

Forget about cruse missiles when push comes to shove they will resort to nukes.


96 posted on 09/06/2013 1:18:50 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson