Posted on 09/07/2013 3:54:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
If the nuclear reactors are already in operation, bombing them might not be an option unless he wants to cause a nuclear disaster in the region.
Look at Fukashima’s unending problems. What could possibly go wrong with another nuke reactor(s) disaster?
Yeah... shame Iraq was destroyed by the Israelis years ago... that’s why there is no ME today.
Come to think of it... the Israelis blew up a reactor facility in Syria recently.
.
Either one sounds good to me-—well, at least much better than starting a world war that could be disastrous!
Hannity sickens me. He should be in the first attack wave since he’s been beating the drums of war since 9/11. Yer a great ‘Merican. Oh puke.
So instead of war on Syria they want war on Iran? Oh well, as long as they get their war...
They sure did, and proved it can be done
Since Col. West agrees with Sean Hannity are you going to smear him too? Next time engage your brain and read before you type a idiotic post
They can go together.
I listen to a lot of Sean and agree with him on most issues. On this, he has always been very hawkish.
Iran may indeed be the “crux” of the problem here.
Good for your comment, unfortunately, some here certainly do short Hannity here.
Action on Iran is very serious, maybe that is where action needs to be taken. Very difficult.
In this particular case then I'd say Alan West is talking as foolishly as Hannity is. If it makes no sense to bomb Syria over Syria then it makes even less sense to bomb Iran over Syria.
I truly enjoyed the syrians claiming it wasn’t a nuclear reactor. I also enjoyed the dead nork scientists. That is what they call a twofer!
The nuclear reactor in Iraq was still under construction when the Israelis destroyed it. There were no radioactive materials at the site.
Read up on operation Opera. The window of opportunity to conduct something similar in Iran has already closed. The only option now is a full scale invasion.
I’d venture to guess that if we quit sending billions of dollars to Iran, Syria, etc. , and quit giving them 400 million tons of weapons, there would be no ‘war’.
We had the assets in place, we had the momentum, and we had adult leadership in Washington.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.