To: SoConPubbie; stephenjohnbanker; LUV W; Patty; itssme; BuckeyeTexan; Jane Long; CatherineofAragon; ..
posted on 09/07/2013 12:04:04 PM PDT
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
Hillary would never debate him. It would be too embarrassing for her.
posted on 09/07/2013 12:08:32 PM PDT
by Cowboy Bob
(Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
I’ll personally run the campaign office in Hollywood if it gets to that. I hate libs anyway.
posted on 09/07/2013 12:19:29 PM PDT
by max americana
(fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
The elites left and right will marginalize him much the same way they did for Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, Palin, Gingrich, or anyone else whom they perceive as someone who won't log-roll with them.
Cruz certainly would be a great president, and a solid candidate, but the media, the democRATS (I know, I repeat myself) and even the republican establishment will line up against him.
He'll get my primary vote just like Alan Keyes did. Were he to win the primary he would get my full throated support in the general.
posted on 09/07/2013 12:31:39 PM PDT
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
But the definitions include an individual born abroad to American parents. Cruzs mother was from Delaware and so, under this definition, he would be qualified to run.
"American parents" -- that's a plural isn't it???
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson