Skip to comments.Obama Has No Red Line for Beheading, Raping Girls and Killing Christians
Posted on 09/07/2013 2:38:46 PM PDT by xzins
President Obama, John Kerry, John McCain and Lindsey Graham are all peddling the anti-Syrian government line and now they have a beloved "red line," whereby they can assist the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood and various al-Qaeda terrorist groups. Of course, when Carla del Ponte stated earlier this year that the United Nations believed that terrorist forces had used chemical weapons; then, of course, this was conveniently ignored by America, France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Kingdom. Similarly, it appears that Obama, Kerry, McCain and Graham don't believe in a red line when it applies to al-Qaeda affiliates, the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and other terrorist forces.
This reality means that unlike the doubts which remain over the chemical issue -- the stark reality of vast numbers of videos showing barbaric massacres by al-Qaeda affiliates and the FSA are realities. In other words, for Obama, Kerry, McCain and Graham, and many others who are assisting sectarian and terrorist forces; they don't have any red lines for cleansing Christians, killing Alawites, children being killed for blasphemy, raping women, slaughtering the Shia, beheading civilians, killing Syrian women who refuse to marry jihadists and so forth. Indeed, the so-called opposition can even kidnap Christian bishops and kill Christian priests because nothing stops America, France and the United Kingdom from providing propaganda for the FSA and various al-Qaeda forces.
Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) comments that "We should be focused on defending the United States of America. That's why young men and women sign up to join the military, not to, as you know, serve as Al Qaeda's air force."
Ted Cruz also stated "I'll give you one of the simplest principles of foreign policy that we ought to be following: Don't give weapons to people who hate you ..Don't give weapons to people who want to kill you."
The unholy Western trinity is supported by the unholy Middle East trinity of Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Of course, you don't expect much from Saudi Arabia where all non-Muslim faiths are illegal and converting to Christianity may lead to your death. Also, in draconian Saudi Arabia very old men can marry little girls of 9 and 10 and women face being punished if they don't cover up from head to toe. Similarly, you don't expect much from feudal Qatar which appears to adore supporting terrorism and endorsing the Muslim Brotherhood (like the Obama administration). Sadly, the same applies to the elites in Turkey because the Erdogan government is crushing all progressive forces in this nation.
However, why no red lines for various terrorist, sectarian and mercenary forces in Syria when it comes to America, France and the United Kingdom? At no point did the three above countries put pressure on Gulf nations and Turkey for assisting brutal anti-Syrian forces. In other words, cleansing Alawites, Christians and the Shia is fine and the same applies to destroying Christian churches and mosques. Therefore, the gang rape of Christian women, videos of killing children deemed apostates and other barbaric massacres all fall under any red line. What does this say for the morality of political leaders who openly support the bombing of Syria?
Dennis Kucinich, a politician and political analyst from America, comments about the situation whereby the Obama administration wants to assist sectarian and terrorist forces in Syria. He states "So what, we're about to become Al-Qaeda's air force now This is a very, very serious matter that has broad implications internationally. And to try to minimize it by saying we're just going to have a 'targeted strike' -- that's an act of war. It's not something to be trifled with."
Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky) in America also made it clear that he doesn't support any side in the conflict and he is no supporter of the government of Syria. However, Rand Paul knows the difference between the government of Bashar al-Assad whereby minorities are protected -- compared with sectarian forces which are intent on crushing all minorities and persecuting pro-government Sunni Muslims. He stated that the Syrian government"has protected Christians for a number of decades" however "Islamic rebels have been attacking Christians" and they are allies of various al-Qaeda affiliates.
Clearly, Christians and all religious minorities co-exist in government controlled areas in Syria and this reality is in stark contrast to areas under sectarian and al-Qaeda affiliates. Obviously, if the population in Damascus believed that the FSA and various other forces were based on democracy, religious pluralism and rights for women; then the capital city would have witnessed a major revolt and people would have fled to opposition held areas. Yet this never happened. On the contrary, religious minorities have fled to government controlled areas because they only feel protected by the armed forces of Syria. This is only natural because the armed forces of Syria are multi religious and represent the rich mosaic of Syria which is fighting against brutal sectarianism.
Images of the FSA and al-Qaeda affiliates teaching children to behead Syrian soldiers and partaking in murdering pro-government civilians aren't deemed to be red lines. Cleansing Alawites, the Shia and Christians also isn't deemed to be a red line. Likewise, car bombings, beheading anyone deemed pro-government and killing children on video also appears to be acceptable. Indeed, even when the UN pointed the finger at anti-Syrian government forces for using chemical weapons this also wasn't deemed to be a red line.
Carla del Ponte, UN human rights investigator, pointed the finger at terrorist forces when another false flag was raised. She stated several months ago that "We still have to deepen our investigation, verify and confirm (the findings) through new witness testimony, but according to what we have established so far, it is at the moment opponents of the regime who are using sarin gas."
In other words, any barbarity committed by various al-Qaeda affiliates, the FSA and other terrorist groups in Syria is either welcomed, swept under the carpet or it means the same forces will obtain more funding and training from the enemies of this country. All in all, so-called opposition forces can gang rape Christian girls, use chemicals, behead people, cut open Syrian soldiers, murder Alawites, kill pro-Sunni Muslim clerics, kidnap Christian bishops and other brutal realities. After all, the red line only applies to the side which is protecting minorities therefore Gulf petrodollars can openly support barbarity -- while NATO Turkey is a conduit for military arms and international jihadists.
Only compliant media groups could peddle the spin emanating from the Obama administration and which is being endorsed by France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Kingdom.
The North American Muslim nation of Barackistan wants us to support the following:
“This reality means that unlike the doubts which remain over the chemical issue — the stark reality of vast numbers of videos showing barbaric massacres by al-Qaeda affiliates and the FSA are realities. In other words, for Obama, Kerry, McCain and Graham, and many others who are assisting sectarian and terrorist forces; they don’t have any red lines for cleansing Christians, killing Alawites, children being killed for blasphemy, raping women, slaughtering the Shia, beheading civilians, killing Syrian women who refuse to marry jihadists and so forth. Indeed, the so-called opposition can even kidnap Christian bishops and kill Christian priests because nothing stops America, France and the United Kingdom from providing propaganda for the FSA and various al-Qaeda forces.”
So, let’s see. Obama wants to kill a bunch of unarmed folks with cruise missiles and drones because he thinks that their leaders may have used Sarin on some other guys who are killing and raping everyone in sight who is not in the Towelhead Brotherhood.
OK, seems like a plan.
Whattabout a Red Line for gov’t screwing up Health Care Insurance?
We The People must demand that Congress explain to every relative who lost a family member in Iraq and Afganistan and all those who came back wounded and disabled why they would vote for aiding rebels with any Al Qaeda terrorist within its ranks when even one is too many!
It’s Insanity at its most treasonous, in my opinion. Any member of Congress who votes for this insanity dishonors everyone who served this nation or is still serving this nation. American heroes must be rolling in their graves at the self-serving traitors in this Regime and in this Congress. Comments anyone?
This is what happens when you give The Manchurian Candidate a free PC ride without impeachment. The guy must be the AC; it would explain a lot.
And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
“So were bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And Im the idiot? - Sarah..”
They get the red carpet.
It’s a heritage thing. Kinda like Eskimos killing walrus’. As long as there is cultural heritage aspect, it’s A-OK!
You need to pay attention, Obama has already said that “...if things turn ugly I will stand with Islam.”
O’Bummer’s “red” line is socialized medicine.
Thing is, if he gets voted down, we may just see another WMD attack. Then what? Another vote?
Skeeter does have a yellow line that runs from his hairline all the way down his scrawny back.
Key word the headline: Christian
obama supports the murder of children, 1,500,000 a year, so its no biggie as far as he is concerned
I posted this yesterday and it attracted a foaming at the mouth, insult flinging DU troll, so I’ll post it again and see if I can catch another one.
Follow the Money
Sunni Muslims have been at war with Alawite and Shiite Muslims for over a thousand years and no one ever paid any attention to their killing each other, so why all of a sudden has our President taken sides in this Muslim domestic disturbance? One thing Ive learned over the years is that when youre trying to identify a motive in a criminal investigation, all you have to do is follow the money and itll usually come into focus.
The first clue came when we saw our President publicly bow and grovel before the King of Saudi Arabia (a Sunni Muslim). Could it have been because the King of Saudi Arabia financed Obamas campaign? Remember, there are still large sums of money in Obamas campaign coffers that havent been adequately explained.
If the King of Saudi Arabia now owns our President, it could explain why Obama has sided with the Kings Sunni Muslim Al-Qaeda rebels in this Civil War against Syrias Alawite/Shiite government. It could also explain why Obama has prevented the development of U.S. oil resources and has effectively killed coal in the U.S. in order to keep our country dependent on foreign oil.
Its evident that U.S national security isnt threatened by this Syrian Civil War and the only reason weve entered into this fracas is because President Obama is bought and paid for by the Saudis. Now, were learning just how many in our Congress, from Boehner to McCain, are also on the Saudi payroll.
Our Secretary of State, John Kerry, just revealed that the Saudi King has offered to reimburse the U.S. for the cost of U.S. strikes in Syria. If President Obama sells the services of our U.S. Military to an Islamic Sultan, as hes about to do, our Soldiers, Sailors, Marines and Airmen will then become historic parallels to Ottoman Janissaries. Americans will then go to war shoulder to shoulder with their Al-Qaeda allies making Osama bin Laden so proud.
Other sources have reported that the Saudis attempted to pay the Russians to stop supporting Assads Syrian Government, but the Russians refused to be bought, and why would the Russians refuse to be bought by the Saudis? Again, just Follow the Money. The only reason the Russians would refuse to be bought by the Saudis is because they see more monetary gain for themselves if this disturbance in Syria escalates and hostilities spread throughout the Middle East.
If the U.S. strikes Syria, it will in all likelihood trigger a war that will quickly spread throughout the Middle East from Israel through Saudi Arabia to Iran. When this happens, nukes could start popping, the Middle East could become radioactive for a half life of at least 10,000 years, and Saudi oil would then become unobtainable on the world market.
As Russia has developed its oil resources equal to or possibly past the Saudis and are now considered the #2 oil producer in the world behind Saudi Arabia, the elimination of Saudi oil will make Russia #1 in the world. Russia can then name their own price for oil, and the world will have to pay. You have to hand it to the Russians, chess players that they are and looking at least five moves ahead, as they will have eliminated their competition and tricked their competition into paying for it.
Dont look for a motive for the Saudi Sunnis, the Syrian Alawites, and the Iranian Shiites, as theyre primitive religious fanatics and dont need a motive beyond their own insanity.
I ask you, just how insane do we have to be to enter into a war among the insane?
Armed Muslims in Nigeria Kill Christians in their Homes
Isn't that truth. I like what Putin asked in his simple speak: If it is shown the al-Qaida rebels were the ones who gassed those people, are you going to bomb them?
The brotherhood, its supporters (e.g., O, McCain, Graham, Saudis) and the demons under their control, are pure evil.
Because the world needs less Christians and Jews. Kill them all said Allah.
The only “red line” nobama, skerryt, mclame and their tallybon buddies understand is the one they draw on your neck in preparation of chopping-off your head. Come-on Christians, girls and others...toughen up and prepare to die. After all...it is purported to be peaceful thereafter.
* BUMP * PING * BOOM *
A long time ago. Deb , people over here are in denial that Obama is a muslim. If they acknowledged that he was, they would have to do something, make a decision that may be unpleasant. Their thinking is that if I continue to keep my head up Obama’s ass or buried in the sand, I won’t have to make a decision that may cause me pain ,therefore, my head stays where it is——until Obama’s henchmenlop it off.
“Thing is, if he gets voted down, we may just see another WMD attack. Then what? Another vote?”
When you say “we” are you referring to an attack on the US by Syria?
You can bet your ass on it. And another wmd attack until it is approved.
You’re speaking of Chi-Congo, right?
Good article. Good point.
Obama will even provide funds for you to kill your baby before it has a chance for “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”.
What do you expect.. the word love is used nowhere in the entire Quran or the source documents..
Islam is not about love.. it is about bullying..
You Must submit to the bully.. The word islam means submission..
If you will not submit then BONK BONK.. rape, pain, death..
The only question is who gets to be the bully..
Sunnis think it is them, Shiites think it is them..
BUT; they both agree it’s NOT YOU!..
Islam is religion of bullying..
Mohamaad recommended that if You decide to NOT BE A BULLY, you must be KILLED...
BAD muslims are not Bullys.. good ones are..
What happens when two or three bullys meet!??... <<- SYRIA..
I'm more an more convinced even that is a good cop/bad cop ruse they play with the world as they covertly work to establish a caliphate.
Depending on the nation and the situation, one is the good and the other the bad.
Osama was Sunni and al Qaeda.
al Zarquawi was Shi'ite and al Qaeda
Why should he?
It's shariaa compliant!
Of course not! You can’t expect to to judge Muslims by your decadent and disgusting Western morality, how dare you. You just can’t understand the purity and beauty of Mohammed while blinded by your illicit Christianity!
If someone can’t see the sarcasm in this without a tag, I’ll barf.
I agree with you about the Saudis.
They are so powerful that there is virtually no criticism of them, even on FR. They have become so wealthy and influential since the oil price spike in 1973 that most everyone fears them.
After sixteen Saudis knocked down the World Trade Centre in 2001 we should have expropriated their oil fields, and distributed the revenue per capita to the world. Instead, we knocked over the secular strongman next door who was serving as a buttress against Shia Iran.
Why should we honor the title of the descendants of Ibn Saud to a quarter of the world's oil? I expressed this on FR during the 2008 financial crisis as a fix and was accused of advocating empire.
Are we so tied to the notion of respecting private property rights that we are willing to sacrifice our country? It appears so.
They've "owned" every President since Bush I.
It’s not surprising when you realize who the gassing victims are. It that were a Christian village the red line would have been blurred pretty fast.
Great post, thanks. Did not know the Russians had turned down the bribe while we are apparently going for it. How sad for our country to be in this position but especially I feel for our military.
I’m glad you noticed. 0bama is NEVER outraged over his buddies murdering Christians or Jews. Not a word. No speech. No condemnation.
He’s telling us very clearly whose side he’s on.
“So, lets see. Obama wants to kill a bunch of unarmed folks with cruise missiles and drones because he thinks that their leaders may have used Sarin on some other guys”
Actually, Obama’s motives are even more compelling. Nine months ago, when the same “terrorist, sectarian and mercenary forces” attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Obama determined that the perpetrators were actually just ordinary people who were outraged by an offensive pornographic video from California. Obama, in fact, was so embarrassed that he left our Ambassador and three accompanying U.S military personnel to die even though help was only an hour away.
Evidently, that same virulent video must have shown up recently in Damascus, incurring our president’s outrage and providing him with a second chance to restore his honor by bombing into oblivion that disgusting Damascus red light district with all those video stores (and I won’t even mention those half naked belly dancers) .
HE DID NOT SAY THAT.
Offending the king has started more than one war. The motives that liberals accuse conservatives of starting wars over; oil, money, real estate and power, are downright noble when compared to killing people over a bruised ego. So-called “progressives” are looping western culture back to the Dark Ages.
Deb, he never said that.
Obama Has No Red Line for Beheading, Raping Girls and Killing Christians
TRUE. At such events isn’t that when the brotherhood usually do their happy dance? How many of the Muslim Brotherhood work for and advise Obama? Now...whose best interest is he looking out for??
Genius post. Thanks.
Yep, he did. Right there in black & white in “Dreams From My Father”.
Hannity played the audio version of Obama’s book during the campaign.