Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First-Degree Murders to Be Released in Kansas
KWCH ^ | Jim Grawe

Posted on 09/08/2013 2:08:36 AM PDT by nickcarraway

Kathy Kessinger of Winfield was strangled to death in 1984. Her then-20-year-old husband was convicted of first-degree murder.

Now, William Kessinger is 49 and about to get his walking papers. At the hearing in March, Kathy Kessinger's family pleaded with the Kansas Prisoner Review Board to refuse the parole. However, the board has since ruled that he qualifies.

Kessinger was convicted before a first-degree murderer could be required to serve 50 years prior to being eligible for parole. So, the board had to use guidelines that were in place at the time, before the law was changed in 1993.

State Representative Jim Ward was a prosecutor in the 1980s.

"It was very frustrating back in the 80s," Ward says. "Victims didn't feel like they had enough control, and people were getting out much earlier than they were anticipating. We saw a pattern of frustration by the public."

Kessinger wasn't the only Cowley County murderer from the 1980s to be paroled this month. Forty-three-year-old Timothy Monasmith found out he's also getting out of prison. At age 18, Monasmith broke into an elderly Arkansas City man's home and stabbed him several times. Monasmith's first-degree murder conviction also carried a life sentence, but he's scheduled to be released later this year.

Kansas Department of Corrections says 296 killers are still serving indeterminate sentences handed down before 1993.

The Kansas Legislature meets in special session next week to make changes in that "Hard 50" law. The purpose is to make it conform with a recent Supreme Court ruling. That ruling requires mandatory sentences to be handed out by juries, not judges as current Kansas law allows. Lawmakers contend they can amend the law retroactively, so all "Hard 50" sentences up until now remain valid.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/08/2013 2:08:36 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway


2 posted on 09/08/2013 2:21:59 AM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Interesting. Though it’s a minor point, it appears KWCH can’t write a headline properly.


3 posted on 09/08/2013 2:33:43 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

NO one can, it seems.


4 posted on 09/08/2013 3:46:50 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What’s the over/under on how many weeks before one of the two is back in jail?


5 posted on 09/08/2013 3:47:23 AM PDT by ken5050 (According to Dick Lugar, I'm a "random outlier." Woo Hoo!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This is why we need capital punishment!
6 posted on 09/08/2013 3:54:59 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Born and raised in Cowley County but I left in 1972 at age 17 due to my father’s transfer to OK so I don’t recognize either of the crimes/criminals mentioned in the article. A high school friend is now the local prosecuting attorney and I can imagine he’s not happy right now, either.


7 posted on 09/08/2013 4:47:19 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Good.Get these people out on the street where the families of the victims can get at them.


8 posted on 09/08/2013 6:37:08 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“That ruling requires mandatory sentences to be handed out by juries, not judges as current Kansas law allows. Lawmakers contend they can amend the law retroactively, so all ‘Hard 50’ sentences up until now remain valid.”

Ex Post facto?

How can you make a law and then punish people for a law that was not in effect at the time? Didn’t think that was constitutional.


9 posted on 09/08/2013 8:00:38 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
Ex Post facto?
How can you make a law and then punish people for a law that was not in effect at the time?

That's what I wondered with this business of turning some misdemeanors from years ago into violent ones and then banning gun ownership because of the change.

10 posted on 09/08/2013 8:52:04 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson