Skip to comments.O'Reilly buys Obama propaganda on Syria
Posted on 09/08/2013 9:50:16 PM PDT by ReformationFan
Bill O'Reilly objects to "bloviating," which I think means giving opinions not based on fact. So what should we make of his claim that "I believe there is overwhelming evidence that the Syrian tyrant Assad did gas civilians, including children." Where is the "overwhelming evidence?"
One day earlier, O'Reilly had claimed, "The evidence is strong that Assad violated the Geneva Convention by using poison gas to kill civilians."
So in the course of one day, the evidence had gone from "strong" to "overwhelming." On what basis did this occur? O'Reilly doesn't say.
I submit that O'Reilly is engaged in bloviating.
O'Reilly, who is about to begin celebrating his 18th year on the air as the host of the most popular Fox News program, is doing tremendous damage to the notion that he can be relied upon for "fair and balanced" coverage of the major issues of the day.
This is far more serious than an error O'Reilly made when he came under fire for falsely claiming that no Republicans were invited to the celebration of Martin Luther King Jr.'s March on Washington. "The mistake? Entirely on me," O'Reilly said.
In the case of going to war, a far more serious matter than talking about invitations to a civil rights event, O'Reilly makes claims that parrot Obama's talking points, but he offers no evidence to substantiate them.
On this issue, O'Reilly should rename his "Talking Points Memo" the "Obama Talking Points Memo." He is one of the best allies that Obama has going for him as he attempts to persuade conservatives in the House to vote for war.
(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...
His network is Saudi owned. The Saudis want Sunni extremists to take over, and are funding the insurgents.
Shoot, they even say they’d be happy to pay for Americans to do the fighting and dying while their lazy sons stay home laughing at us.
He has the most popular program only because he has the best time slot.
O’Reilly is a pompous ass of little intellect.
People watch him because there is nothing else on at that hour.
I haven’t watched O’Reilly in years.
But this sounds like he was slobbering to get this interview with The Won.
Sorry dude, Chris Wallace won.
I quit watching him years ago when the Saudis bought him-—and he quit referring to the “muslim” youths who were burning cars as “muslim”. Such a coward and liar (by omission) which is evil).
Another interesting thing is how sympathetic to homosexual behavior he is-—since the Saudis prefer little boys for sex. Seems like since the Saudis were allowed to fly out after 9/11—as if they owned America-—there is a big push to normalize homosexual marriage/sodomy promotion in Kindergartens/Boy Scouts, etc. They really are forcing Christian Ethics out of the minds of the masses and paganism in.
Trying to get us ready for the NWO when polygamy/sodomy/pederasty/slavery will be the norm again (Worldview) like in pagan/occult cultures and like in the muslim countries of today.
They’re happy to provide chemical weapons to the insurgents too. and then blow them up so Obama can blame Assad for using chemical weapons.
The time slot helps, but BOR has the most popular program in large part because he has absolutely zero competition. If you're a conservative or any other thinking person and you cannot bring yourself to watch the pro-democRAT propaganda that passes for programming on all the liberal networks, what other choice do you have but to watch BOR?
If and when a network decides to air programming during BOR's time slot that isn't far left, programming that conservatives would want to see, O'Reilly's ratings would drop like a rock.
I haven’t watched O’Really or FNC for years
To the headline: of course he does
BOR has been in obama’s corner from the beginning.
It is NOT Saudi owned, they own 7%
FUBO and FUBO
I stopped watching the liberal asswipe in 2004 when I heard him say the Swift Boat Vets had no right to be heard. They fought for this country. So as far as I am concerned, they have more right than he does.
I watch O’Reilly every chance I get because it is entertainment. I do not go there expecting a pure conservative forum. It is strictly a variety of guests talking about a variety of subjects.
And you are right it is not Saudi owned. 7% does not make you an owner.
The Skunk = It is half black, half white and everything it does stinks.
It is NOT Saudi owned, they own 7%
And what percentage of Fox do you own? If it is less than 7%, then permit me to suggest that the Saudis have far more leverage with Fox than you and I combined.
Believe a serial liar if you want to, Billy Boy.
I’m not stupid, so I’m not going to.
And I also don’t care if he’s black or if he makes a jackass of himself in front of the world.
I saw the piece with the colonels, both of which disagree with him about attacking Syria. The downside is that he’s sold out on punishing those gas attacks. The upside is he did allow a bit of the opposing view to have their time on air. He never really argues with the colonels the way he does with some.
There isn’t overwhelming evidence that that Assad used gas.
Forget that and ask who gets all those WMDs if Assad is defeated? A bunch of radical jihadists.
That is no better and is actually worse. Not only are they practicing ethnic cleansing against Christians, but they are far more likely to try to export those wmds.
O’Reilly is seriously misguided on this one.
He’s worried about Obama becoming a lame duck.
I never knew he cared so much about Obama, but there is no such thing as a lame duck president. They always retain the veto. Clinton proved that when they thought he’d finally become a duck.
O’Reilly has hardly said anything about Soetoro’s birth, the forged “birth certificate,” etc., that wasn’t a lie.
"Where is the "overwhelming evidence?""
Kerry showed him some pictures at a cocktail party?
He is no longer the peoples advocate as he bills himself, he has begun to love his position of power and influence and lost sight of the truth. And I think he likes 0.
Yes there is there is gospel radio or a cd,who needs TV, we have FR.
BOR is to punditry what Christie is to politics.
Who gassed the rubes.... the bad guys or the badder guys or the baddest guys..
Starting to look like a lose, lose, lose situation..
Seems the ones trying to make this decision are NOT THE GOOD GUYS.... either..
to wit; BUY Popcorn commodities.. the smart people are eating it by the handfuls..
Im not stupid, so Im not going to. And I also dont care if hes black or if he makes a jackass of himself in front of the world.
Obama is no blacker than he is white.. meaning he is as white as he is black..
Calling Obama BLACK IS A LIE.... a delusion.. a bait and switch.. a boondoggle.. a con..
It like calling America a democracy when it is NOT..
Or even saying America’s elections are honest and not Fraud..
Many maybe most are delusional..
O’Reilly’s no-spin zone exists solely because there is no room for anyone else’s spin after BO spins and spins and spins on every topic.
Bill O’Reilly is a complete ‘know-it-all’ idiot. I cannot watch him more than I can O’bama.
O’Reilly is not very bright. I stopped watching when he said Hillary didn’t have a chance to win Senate seat. If he’s so unaware of the stupidity of New Yorkers, he is seriously impaired. Not surprised he’s swallowed the Syria pill.
The media like to call Ted Baxter a conservative.
He isn’t, and frankly, I quit liking him after about six months of seeing his show on Fox...he is not conservative, he is more of a populist, I think.
O’Reilly is not to be taken seriously. He is, and always will be, Ted Baxter.
i believe he daid if O didnt move to the center he will be finished. this was said in 2011.
Heck, if the administration is so concerned about the citizens being gassed in Syria, why don’t they consider bombing North Korea as well who has done far more atrocities to their citizens.
Every time a county uses terror on their citizens is not an excuse for military action.
I am still looking for all of those places in the United States where Ted O ‘Baxter insisted that we can go and legally buy “machineguns and bazookas” without “any kind of backtound check “.
Still haven’t found them.
How about it’s part of the Muslim infiltration of
EVerything - - -
7 percent - - ‘foot in the door - - -’
Infiltration of everything eliminates the need to conquer by sword. . .
0bammy and 0rilley both bow down to the Sawdi’s.
“The time slot helps, but BOR has the most popular program in large part because he has absolutely zero competition. If you’re a conservative or any other thinking person and you cannot bring yourself to watch the pro-democRAT propaganda that passes for programming on all the liberal networks, what other choice do you have but to watch BOR?”
I watch Man vs Food re-runs :)
Same here. I used to like O'Bloviator's show because he was one of the first interviewers in years who would not let guests spin their way out of tough questions. However, I now see him as little more than an arrogant and ignorant fool. If I watch anything on Fox now, it is the occasional RedEye for a laugh.
I prefer to make up my own mind.
O’Reilly is a loud mouth AHole.
I.m still proud to say l.ve nener watch a whole Bore show. He isa phony now and was a phony years ago when he was on local tv in NYc.
He owns 2.3 billion dollars in stock. Murdoch partners with him in business deals with Murdoch conversely owning shares in the Prince's personaland separate vast media empire.
Alwaleed donates millions to Muslim causes in the U.S. such as CAIR, also to the imam planning to build that mosque and Islam community center near Ground Zero in Manhattan, and also to front groups trying to spread Sharia law in America.
If you recall, Mayor Rudy adamantly refused to accept a donation from him after 9/11. Alwaleed is first cousin to two of the 9/11 terrorists.
Murdoch is an Australian who became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1985. One of his News Corp. media holdings was involved in a huge hacking scandal in England and countless heads rolled.
I consider Rupert to be essentially a globalist-type, and I consider Fox News itself to be foreign-owned in cold reality, despite Murdoch's getting himself naturalized.
Others can draw their own conclusions as to the ownership condition at News Corp. and who is in charge of the propaganda power this vast media conglomeration wields.
I always view O'Reilly's weasely statist/fascist/populist bloviations in the light of who signs his pay checks
Also said that it was proven that no WMD’s went from Iraq to Syria. When? How? By Who?
That explains a lot, including the leftward turn Fox News has been taking.
O’Really has painted himself into a corner and 98% of his audience disagree with him. He slammed one guest by saying their proof was the internet compared to his regime evidence. I doubt he even knows what Google does.
Pray for America to Wake Up
Sorry Bill, you mean well, but you are wrong here. The USA didn’t attack the Japan in 1941.
I haven’t watched the BOR since it became obvious that he believes that so-called “assault weapons” are machine guns. What a dolt.