Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Niagara Ceramics closing, ending 110 jobs (Unfair competition from China?)
The Buffalo News ^ | September 9, 2013 | David Robinson

Posted on 09/09/2013 7:09:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Niagara Ceramics, the dinnerware manufacturer that was created after the closing of Buffalo China nine years ago, is shutting down, throwing 110 workers out of their jobs.

The company announced the shutdown of its sprawling factory at 75 Hayes Place on Monday in a filing with the state Labor Department.

Company officials, in the filing, cited “economic” reasons for the closing, which they said was effective immediately.

Robert L. Lupica, the former Buffalo China executive and president of Niagara Ceramics, could not be reached to comment.

Lupica was part of an investment group headed by Rep. Chris Collins, R-Clarence, that purchased the Buffalo business for $5.5 million from Oneida Ltd., which had announced the year before that the plant would be closed. The plant was purchased with a combination of Collins’ personal capital, bank financing and tax incentives.

Collins released the following statement Monday, noting that he was no longer involved with the company:

“I am sorry to hear of the closure of Niagara Ceramics, something I learned about today for the first time from the media. I transferred my ownership interest in Niagara Ceramics in 2012, at no cost, to the management team in an effort to give them the best chance possible at future success. I have had no involvement in the company since that point. Prior to 2012, I had not been involved in day-to-day management of the company since 2007.”

Buffalo China had at least 325 workers at the time of its shutdown in March 2004. Niagara Ceramics hired 240 workers as it began its operations, reducing wages and benefits from what they were under Buffalo China. By late last year, the company’s workforce had dwindled to around 110.

At the time, Lupica blamed the company’s shrinking workforce on the recession that began in late 2007.

The dwindling employment was at the center of controversial ads from supporters of former Rep. Kathleen C. Hochul that attacked Collins for job losses at the Buffalo plant. A review of the ads by The Buffalo News found that most of their claims were false.

The ads claimed Collins fired more than 100 workers after acquiring the company, but Collins supporters said the purchase was made five months after Oneida detailed plans to close the factory and that the new owners did not fire anyone.

Niagara Ceramics was one of just two major producers of commercial-quality dinnerware in the United States. The company supplied popular chain restaurants and nursing homes, and also made dinnerware used at local attractions, including the Roycroft Inn and Darwin Martin House.

The Longaberger Co. announced in May that it would take over a portion of the Niagara Ceramics plant and start making some of its pottery products in Buffalo as part of its push to eventually make all of its pottery products in the United States. Longaberger said it expected to employ 22 people at its pottery-making venture at the plant.

Collins said in his statement that Niagara Ceramics faced unfair competition.

“Niagara Ceramics consistently struggled because of unfair competition from Chinese manufacturers who benefit from China manipulating its currency at the expense of American jobs. As a member of Congress, I believe strongly that the U.S. must take a harder stand against this unfair practice by the Chinese government.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: ceramics; china; chriscollins; congress; dinnerware; economy; gop; layoffs; newyork

1 posted on 09/09/2013 7:09:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obamacare


2 posted on 09/09/2013 7:14:31 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

People we need to work in America.

We need to stop sending US jobs everywhere else.

We need to bring them home. We need to build them, support them, and encourage them financially and every other way.

NOW.


3 posted on 09/09/2013 7:17:29 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

To those effected who voted for DIMs/LIBs/RINOs...

Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!


4 posted on 09/09/2013 7:20:18 PM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ogen hal

Today all over the media is a report, how this year America is ranked 17th in the world, or in otherwords the 17th best place to live.

What is very, very heavily downplayed is, that is down from 11.

We are sinking fast. And our media is out front, singing as loud as they can, in the rain.


5 posted on 09/09/2013 7:26:43 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ogen hal; Cringing Negativism Network; 2ndDivisionVet
China and Japan have thousands of years of history of producing fine China but I suspect what was being produced for this market by this company is something quite different. This company was probably producing a commodity and they were unable to compete under the taxes and regulations, including Obamacare, impose on them in the United States against commodities produced by cheap labor and sold under a manipulated currency.

Much like immigration, our trade policy has been pretty much in line with the demands of the Wall Street Journal and it is time to reassess whether free trade, like open borders, can any longer be sustained by a welfare state competing against manipulated economies.

Open borders, whether admitting people or goods, is a political decision in which one part of society is benefited at the expense of another part of society. This is a reality that goes back to regional differences shaping America's response to the war of 1812. Should the country protect New England manufacturers at the expense of Southern consumers?

Today the Wall Street Journal wants us to protect American businesses with cheap labor through immigration and it wants us to protect high-tech exporters at the expense of commodity manufacturers. We have pretty much done so and the results are not pretty. But it is not as simple as that, we have benefited consumers but not if they are blue-collar workers in the manufacturing sector.

One thinks back to the warnings of Pat Buchanan and, dare I say it, Ross Perot which predicted the hardships we are now experiencing.


6 posted on 09/09/2013 8:50:59 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

You keep on saying “bring back jobs NOW” in response to damn near anything on FR.

So tell me, oh wise one, just HOW do you suggest that we do that?

(this oughta be good)


7 posted on 09/09/2013 10:27:55 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

Tariffs. They worked until the Progressives lowered them to nil 100 years ago.


8 posted on 09/09/2013 10:48:02 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sad.


9 posted on 09/09/2013 10:49:53 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I didn’t ask you.

I asked that other union shill.


10 posted on 09/09/2013 10:54:56 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: central_va

What is your suggested schedule of tariffs?

What will you do to compensate consumers hurt by the tariff?

Do you think the sugar tariff has been good for America?


11 posted on 09/10/2013 2:14:44 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
One thinks back to the warnings of Pat Buchanan and, dare I say it, Ross Perot which predicted the hardships we are now experiencing.

It's worse, we don't have American Quality. Try buying replacement plumbing fixtures and your old knob doesn't fit the new valve because the tolerance stack up is all wrong and that means they have no QC or don't care in China. Want to buy 4130 Chrome-Moly Steel Steel Tubing for the Roll Cage in your Race Car? Better ask where it made, i.e the US, Germany, or China because what are Tubing "Certs" i.e. papers in China? Many in the know ask, and don't trust what in coming from China, we don't know if it really is 4130, close or absolute junk...

12 posted on 09/10/2013 2:31:02 AM PDT by taildragger (The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

lets send your job to china and see you squeal like a stuck piggie.


13 posted on 09/10/2013 2:49:56 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

Tariffs. They work

Free Trader Communism doesn’t work. You cannot provide any factual proof that it works


14 posted on 09/10/2013 3:19:44 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (You cannot be conservative while supporting the bankruptcy of your nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Tariff rates based on other nations “dumping”....currency manipulation...VAT rebates....regional and international trade agreements signed

Consumers would have decent....and steady employment in manufacturing. Can’t be a consumer with no job or income

Sugar tariff kept Fidel Castro from getting any more powerful. Free Trader Communists are the only ones biatching about no Free Trade with a Communist country. Free Traders are the biggest enablers and supporters of Communism


15 posted on 09/10/2013 3:26:30 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (You cannot be conservative while supporting the bankruptcy of your nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

“Obamacare”

Hillary and the Dems constantly run on a platform of jobs for upstate NY, the situation there continues to deteriorate, and they’ll (successfully) run on it again. NY state has the same problem as many Dem strongholds; too many people voting who don’t want a job, overwhelming the dwindling number who need the jobs.

NY state is beautiful country; it is also a harbinger of what awaits most of the US. Rustbelt cities filled with the permanent underclass, which is quickly changing from black to brown.


16 posted on 09/10/2013 4:23:19 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

“...they were unable to compete under the taxes and regulations, including Obamacare, impose on them in the...”


You have “hit the nail on the head” with that statement.

As an owner of a manufacturing business I can tell you that the cost of an employee and the massive regulations involved, makes it very hard to set the price of a manufacturer’s product at a competitive level with anyone or any foreign company not under the thumb of the U.S. government regulators.

Take the cost of unions and it gets much worse.

The simple way to bring America back to it’s glory is to completely remove all government and union forces against business and we would once again be the most powerful economy in the world.....in very short order.


17 posted on 09/10/2013 4:23:56 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Yeah, we need a trade war now. Good plan.


18 posted on 09/10/2013 4:26:43 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DH
As an owner of a manufacturing business I can tell you that the cost of an employee and the massive regulations involved, makes it very hard to set the price of a manufacturer’s product at a competitive level with anyone or any foreign company not under the thumb of the U.S. government regulators.

OK so you have an hourly cost for employee and an hourly cost for regulations. How would you decrease each? For the employee you have wages, benefits, payroll and unemployment taxes. What percentage of the hourly costs are made up by these? What is your solution in that area? Under regulations you have an hourly cost per employee for keeping up with the paperwork. Again, what percentage of the hourly cost is made up by this and what goes in to it?

19 posted on 09/10/2013 4:30:19 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

The questions you ask clearly show that you have no experience in running a business; especially a manufacturing business.

If you actually ran a business you would not have to ask the questions you posted. Every one who runs any type of business from manufacturing to sales knows the costs incurred and imposed by government and union regulations.


20 posted on 09/10/2013 4:52:44 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

We are in a trade war, we need to fight.


21 posted on 09/10/2013 5:15:25 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The company failed because it was old and worn out and unable to compete in the world market. The company had the misfortune to be located in New York.


22 posted on 09/10/2013 5:19:10 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Sure, lets increase the tariffs on imports. How do you think China is going to react to that. Or OPEC.

You are going to throw Japan under the bus, and all China needs to do is dump a small percentage of their Treasury bills.

All of the conservatives in the 90’s thought all of the free trade was great.

Those chickens are coming home to roost.

Libertarians like Paul and Perot tried to warn us.


23 posted on 09/10/2013 5:21:06 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
What is your suggested schedule of tariffs?

Start at 5% then escalate 1% per year until 10%, then either stop escalating or reduce as industry returns(or not).

What will you do to compensate consumers hurt by the tariff?

Wrong question but I will answer: Reduce the personal income tax to reflect revenue gains thru tariffs. Ultimately, eliminate the income tax (pre-1913 situation). Install a NSRT of 6% AFTER income tax is eliminated completely.

Do you think the sugar tariff has been good for America?

Looking around maybe a ban on sugar

24 posted on 09/10/2013 5:21:48 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Progressives like you love income taxes and hate tariffs. Screw that.


25 posted on 09/10/2013 5:23:12 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
That's a nice summary.

As far as the consumer saving through imports, I'd question that. For quality merchandise the consumer doesn't save when it's not made in the USA. The corporations, spokesmen, those transporting the goods do very well. Does anyone seriously think Nike wouldn't make a profit if their $200 sneakers were made in the USA? On the other end, a lot of the cheap merchandise needs replacement more often.

It's certainly not helping the US to have all wealth sucked upward. What's the answer? The cynic in me suspects there isn't one until the global economy collapses.

26 posted on 09/10/2013 5:34:01 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DH
The questions you ask clearly show that you have no experience in running a business; especially a manufacturing business.

That's true. So how about enlightening me and answering the questions?

27 posted on 09/10/2013 5:34:44 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Hey, we stole the making of China from China, now they are getting it back again.


28 posted on 09/10/2013 5:36:40 AM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: central_va

What the hell are you talking about?

You blather on like someone in 1931.

The world economy is not a black and white issue.

Your proposals would result in a world war, at best.


29 posted on 09/10/2013 5:37:47 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Oh...then I saw whom I was answering. You would prefer to have slaves, so we could make iPhones here.


30 posted on 09/10/2013 5:38:56 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: central_va

What are you going to do when the Russians and Europeans slap a larger tarrif on our wheat?


31 posted on 09/10/2013 5:40:52 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

We just might.

Right now, we are losing big-time.

Fighting a tradewar, might be the only way we can side with our own people.

BUY AMERICAN.


32 posted on 09/10/2013 5:50:53 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Why waste my time writing a book to try to TEACH you about Real-World business. Not the kind taught by professors who have no experience in the real world of business.

To answer your questions it would take many hours of writing a small book to do so. Since I am a businessman, I will do so if you pay me for my time to do so. Otherwise, buzz off.


33 posted on 09/10/2013 6:11:53 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I am sitting here thinking of the most recent purchases I’ve made of any consequence:

Expensive, professional DSLR camera—none made in the US
Flat Screen TV—none made in the US
Pick Up Truck (Silverado)—assembled in Mexico from foreign made parts.
New Balance Sneakers—Made in USA
Food—Produce from South America (not in season yet)
Silver and Gold Coins—Made in the US

There are not a lot of products to buy from the US. We have essentially become a colony—we export a lot of raw materials—so buying USA is tough.


34 posted on 09/10/2013 6:38:41 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DH

Don’t bother with the book. I’ll find someone who knows what they’re talking about and ask them instead.


35 posted on 09/10/2013 6:57:02 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Dude, we are tariffed to death now. They tariff our products now. We are the stupid ones.


36 posted on 09/10/2013 7:02:39 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Oh...then I saw whom I was answering. You would prefer to have slaves, so we could make iPhones here.

You prefer Chinese slaves....

37 posted on 09/10/2013 7:04:23 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Your proposals would result in a world war, at best.

You sit to pee, admit it.

38 posted on 09/10/2013 7:05:11 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Do you have a working plan for implementation or is it by imperial fiat?

Do you know of a country presently using tariffs to eliminate taxes on individuals or corporations? If yes, what is their tariff schedule and how do they offset the harm tariffs do to consumers and entrepreneurs?

Regarding the ‘ban on sugar’, do you support NY Mayor Bloomberg’s efforts to control human behavior via civil/secular law?

Is the hyperprofit experienced by the Sugar Cabal an intentional or accidental effect of the sugar tariff? Do you oppose this kind of crony capitalism and the windfall profits it generates for political entrepreneurs?


39 posted on 09/10/2013 7:18:29 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You are an idiot. But we already knew that. I guess we are making progress. Your mindset has moved from defending one failed economy in the condeferacy to another: early 1930’s America.

We need to unshackle our businesses so they can compete. But that would mean wholesale revolution in the US. You won’t get anyone in the US to work for the necessary wage in order to compete.

Allow companies to bring overseas profit home. That would help too.


40 posted on 09/10/2013 8:21:57 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
The FIRST law signed by George Washington, you've heard of him I am sure, was the tariff Act. That George was anti US and anti business, a bad President wasn't he? /sarc

Tariff_Act_of_1789

41 posted on 09/10/2013 9:02:21 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
We need to unshackle our businesses so they can compete

By the time we unshackle the manufacturing sector, it will be a fetid corpse thanks to the Free Traitors.....

42 posted on 09/10/2013 9:05:01 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The country was a different place then, with different needs, and I’ll not judge Mr. Washington or any Founder too hard. Even Hamilton and Jefferson deserve a break.

My question to you, and I do want to understand it because I don’t agree with your position, is how do you manage the harm caused by tariffs to some and the bonus tariffs are to others? I am sincere and hope you can explain yourself.

I’d love to get rid of the income tax, reduce the size of government, et. al. What I don’t want is to make an already bad situation worse.

Here’s an example, from Pres. Washinton’s time of how tariffs cause harm, political as well as economic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_Act_of_1789#Political_and_Sectional_Responses_to_the_Tariff

Note that it’s from your link, just a little further down the page.


43 posted on 09/10/2013 10:29:22 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Having no legs, that’s pretty much a given.


44 posted on 09/10/2013 2:35:37 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: central_va
trim regulation so companies can compete with foreign countries...

drill for oil and natural gas....we could own the world...

right to work....

45 posted on 09/11/2013 8:59:06 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson