Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Administration Loses Its Earlier Enthusiasm for the United Nations
Cybercast News Service ^ | September 10, 2013 - 4:15 AM | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 09/10/2013 2:17:41 PM PDT by Olog-hai

As it does every September, the State Department later this will week send a senior official to present U.S. “goals and priorities for the upcoming session of the United Nations General Assembly,” but this year’s speech comes at a time when the administration is sounding a lot less enthusiastic about the institution it once eagerly sought to engage and extol.

Frustration over failure to get a concerted U.N. stance against the Syrian regime—both before but especially since the August 21 chemical weapons attack—has prompted uncharacteristically glum comments about the world body from an administration that presented itself as an antidote to its predecessor’s supposed “unilateralism.”

From the president down, officials have indicated a readiness to act outside the U.N. Security Council (UNSC), running in the face of multilateralists’ long-held views that it alone can legally authorize military action. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: obama; rop; syria; un

1 posted on 09/10/2013 2:17:41 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

That’s because the UN is not per se focused on advancing the Jehad.


2 posted on 09/10/2013 3:01:16 PM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

One of the good things about the Syria debate is that noone is talking about getting UN approval is. Noone really cares about it—and they should not. The UN has no authority to authorize or not authorize war. The question about Syria is actually being correctly posed:

“Does Obama have to get Congressional approval before starting a war that is not a response to an immediate threat to the national security of the US.”

Having a debate about that instead of vaporous international norms and the UN is refreshing.

I acknowledge Obama’s authority to respond without congressional approval to an imminent threat to the US. But beyond that, I believe Congress needs to authorize it.


3 posted on 09/10/2013 3:16:25 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Was the UN a red line a few hours ago?


4 posted on 09/10/2013 3:36:59 PM PDT by GOPJ (Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson