Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allendale
Nothing's changed. He gave the speech in August of this year and indicated Israel is willing to go after Iran now.

Here's another link for you with more detail showing that your thesis is wrong -

Since the cancellation of the planned Iran’s nuclear program has continued to progress. Today, argues Eiland, Israel again faces a difficult choice. “Time has passed and we stand before exactly the same decision, with less time. ” He added, “The lack of resolution is dramatic.”

21 posted on 09/10/2013 9:24:59 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: vbmoneyspender

Well we’ll see. Always felt that Netanyahu would never leave office before he took definitive action against the Iranian threat. However stand by the thesis that the strategic reality has shifted in the last year and Israel cannot now attack Iran with impunity. They may ultimately decide that they must, but they risk a terrible counterattack. Also it is by no means certain that if Israel attacks alone, the mission would be successful. A failed mission would be a disaster.


22 posted on 09/10/2013 9:33:05 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson