Posted on 09/11/2013 1:58:38 PM PDT by NotYourAverageDhimmi
On Tuesday night, voters in two Colorado districts ousted two prominent state senators due to their support for strict state-level gun control measures. Colorado, which has been trending Democratic over the past four election cycles, has been uniquely resistant to the Republican message. For a moment, that trend in the Centennial State was halted as voters ejected state Sen. Angela Giron and state Senate President John Morse from elected office.
Pundits and political scientists often warn observers that special or recall elections are not indicative of any political trend. They are not predictive of the results of a general election or portents of a great wave favoring one party or the other. They are best analyzed based on the isolated factors that motivated the voters who turned out – in this case, gun control laws – and the universal mechanics that get candidates elected to office.
While these two races were proxy battles between the National Rifle Association and New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg’s anti-gun organization Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the outcomes of these races are unlikely to be especially instructive for analysts who are attempting to determine how the debate on guns will evolve ahead of the 2014 midterms.
However, what is instructive about the national mood is the reaction that these recalls inspire among national political figures and pundits. The most obnoxious and delusional reaction, presuming it is even genuine, has thus far been expressed by Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL).
“The recall elections in Colorado were defined by the vast array of obstacles that special interests threw in the way of voters for the purpose of reversing the will of the legislature and the people,” Wasserman Schultz insisted in a statement. “This was voter suppression, pure and simple.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
Except the results exactly matched the beforehand polling. I guess that was “poll suppression”. DWS is a stupid, ugly waste of space on this planet.
[Voter Supression] == [Requiring Photo ID]
Surely they meant, “voter fraud suppression.”
Maybe that is what happened to Anthony W in NY...
Since it was a State Election, that giant apparatus in la-la land that counts National Votes wasn’t used....somehow, that mega-counter leads to many Dem’s Wins in alot of places (that’s how we got The Messiah in 2012)
Supression was needed to prevent all the lib arts majors from Colorado College bringing in fake registrations (complying completely with the idiot new registration laws put in by the very same idiotcrats that voted in the gun legislation).
Morse was almost saved by the sleezy idiots.
She must be in the top 5 dumbest humans ever elected to an office.
The only thing “pure and simple” about Schultz’s statement is that she’s delusional.
Is Debbie Wasserman-Schultz saying that the scientific polling method they used in these telephone polls accounted for Wasserman's alleged 'voting suppression'?
Lunacy.
I thought it was because of Glowbull Warming!?!
wah wah whah! them grapes aer pretty sour, eh?
And the most shameless, compulsive, pathological, straight-faced, slimy-haired liars among all Democrats.
Her and Pelosi.
YEP. SHE IS A HACK. BLANK STARE DUMB.
Wait...I thought only GOP “voter suppression” tactics was used to suppress minorities voters...not your average white person....
That what the libtards keep telling us....
Oh, it doesn't seem to be there...
I know, let me read this on the front page of CNN.com!!
Oh, I can't find it there either...
You can bet your sweet ass if these results went the other way, they would be red top banner headlines at both of these websites!!
Since it went the other way (the right way!!) you see nothing. Typical crooked MSM.
Little Debbie sez that the NRA and the Koch brothers money suppressed votes, well then....So, using that logic shouldn’t Nanny Bloombergs money done the same??
Debbie has had her head banged against the headboard one to many times.
They’re just mad because their college student stooges couldn’t stuff enough ballot boxes to make the difference.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.