His terminal wackiness is featured in this FR thread from 2011.
Posted on 09/12/2013 8:41:14 PM PDT by chessplayer
no kidding.
Randi would know, She is an Air force expert /s
This Malloy is one of the most hateful people on radio. I heard him with my own ears call for liberals to take up knives to slaughter conservatives while they sleep.
“The fourth plane hijacked on 9/11, United Airlines Flight 93, crashed in an open field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after the passengers revolted. Out of the four planes hijacked on that day, Flight 93 was the only one not to reach its target.”
“One of the popular conspiracy theories surrounding this event is that Flight 93 was actually shot down by a U.S. fighter jet. David Ray Griffin and Alex Jones say that large parts of the plane including the main body of the engine landed miles away from the main wreckage site, too far away for an ordinary plane crash. Jones says that planes usually leave a small debris field when they crash, and that this is not compatible with reports of wreckage found farther away from the main crash site. A posting on Rense.com claimed that the main body of the engine was found miles away from the main wreckage site with damage comparable to that which a heat-seeking missile would do to an airliner.”
“According to some theories, the plane had to be shot down by the government because passengers had found out about the alleged plot.”
“According to Phil Molé of Skeptic magazine, “[this] claim rests largely on unsupported assertions that the main body of the engine and other large parts of the plane turned up miles from the main wreckage site, too far away to have resulted from an ordinary crash. This claim is incorrect, because the engine was found only 300 yards from the main crash site, and its location was consistent with the direction in which the plane had been traveling.”[131] Michael K. Hynes, an airline accident expert who investigated the crash of TWA Flight 800 in 1996, says that, at very high velocities of 500 mph or more, it would only take a few seconds to move or tumble across the ground for 300 yards.”
“Reports of wreckage discovered at Indian Lake by local residents are accurate. CNN reported that investigators found debris from the crash at least eight miles away from the crash site, including in New Baltimore.[132] However, according to CNN, this debris was all very light material that the wind would have easily blown away, and a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article from September 14, 2001 describes the material as “mostly papers”, “strands of charred insulation”, and an “endorsed paycheck”. The same article quotes FBI agent Bill Crowley that, “Lighter, smaller debris probably shot into the air on the heat of a fireball that witnesses said shot several hundred feet into the air after the jetliner crashed. Then, it probably rode a wind that was blowing southeast at about 9 m.p.h.”[133] Also, the distance between the crash site and Indian Lake was misreported in some accounts. According to the BBC, “In a straight line, Indian Lake is just over a mile from the crash site. The road between the two locations takes a roundabout route of 6.9 miles—accounting for the erroneous reports.”
“Some conspiracy theorists believe a small white jet seen flying over the crash area may have fired a missile to shoot down Flight 93.[134][dubious – discuss] However, government agencies such as the FBI assert this small plane was a Dassault Falcon business jet asked to descend to an altitude of around 1,500 ft to survey the impact.[135] Ben Sliney, who was the FAA operation manager on September 11, 2001, says no military aircraft were near Flight 93.”
“Some internet videos, such as Loose Change, speculate that Flight 93 safely landed in Ohio, and a substituted plane was involved in the crash in Pennsylvania.[137] Often cited is a preliminary news report that Flight 93 landed at a Cleveland airport;[138] it was later learned that Delta Flight 1989 was the plane confused with Flight 93, and the report was retracted as inaccurate. Several websites within the 9/11 Truth Movement dispute this claim, citing the wreckage at the scene, eyewitness testimony, and the difficulty of secretly substituting one plane for another, and claim that such “hoax theories... appear calculated to alienate victims’ survivors and the larger public from the 9/11 truth movement”. The editor of the article has since written a rebuttal to the claims.”
“Valencia McClatchey, a local woman who took the only photograph of the mushroom cloud from the impact of Flight 93 seconds after it hit the ground, says she has been harassed over the telephone and in person by conspiracy theorists, who claim she faked the photo. The FBI, the Somerset County authorities, the Smithsonian, and the National Park Service’s Flight 93 National Memorial staff have all examined the photograph as well as the film negatives and they consider the photo to be authentic.”
“While some conspiracy theorists have claimed that passengers of Flight 93 and/or Flight 77, were murdered or that they were relocated, with the intent that they never be found, others within the 9/11 Truth Movement, such as Jim Hoffman and Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, refute such claims.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories#Flight_93
His terminal wackiness is featured in this FR thread from 2011.
Good thoughts Chess. The only thing I still can’t figure out that is in my old life I have seen many plane wrecks in person, on TV, and film and there is ALWAYS a great amount of debris evident. Where was the plane? What happened to it?
That’s because most plane crashes don’t dive pretty much straight into the ground like this one did.
Remember the plane crash a good while back that dove straight into the ground in the Everglades. It just disappeared.
I think I recall him, a small bespecled, unassuming fellow. Sort of a Bob Newhart in jeans.
And now he has six listeners who believe him. Do the math.<<
That’s if you count the people station surfing...and assume everyone believes him that listens...in the worst case scenario...mathematically speaking of course.
DK
In that case, would a conservative seeking out and terminating Malloy be considered an act of preemptive self-defense?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.