Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full title: Global warming is just HALF what we said: World's top climate scientists admit computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong
1 posted on 09/15/2013 11:38:14 AM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: matt04

UN out of US now!


2 posted on 09/15/2013 11:40:54 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Refuse; Resist; Rebel; Revolt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

Obama got the Global warming hype wrong too.


3 posted on 09/15/2013 11:44:28 AM PDT by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

global warming is a hoax. the media and government have the democrat sheep believing in global warming

government doesn’t work and must be abolished except for military and border control.

for 30 years the government has been funding fake studies to create the global warming hoax. the media has been screeching global warming for 30 years. it’s all to destroy capitalism, destroy our freedom and our economy . in other words they created the global warming imaginary goblin to scare us into accepting socialism/statism


4 posted on 09/15/2013 11:49:23 AM PDT by Democrat_media (IRS rigged election for Obama and democrats by shutting down tea party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

“We are a bunch of liars and we accept lies as evidence, so you can believe us....”


5 posted on 09/15/2013 11:49:52 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04; All
GW Mixed Up photo GWMixedUp.jpg

6 posted on 09/15/2013 11:50:10 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
One of the report’s own authors, Professor Myles Allen, the director of Oxford University’s Climate Research Network, last night said this should be the last IPCC assessment – accusing its cumbersome production process of ‘misrepresenting how science works’.
8 posted on 09/15/2013 11:53:11 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
STUDY: Climate change causing climate models to become less reliable.
10 posted on 09/15/2013 12:04:12 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

Half of zero is still zero. Hah hah hah you phoney scientists you make me sick.


11 posted on 09/15/2013 12:06:14 PM PDT by Ceausescu (21st century update to Stalin’s maxim: He who controls the media controls the voting booth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
Ruined lives are the result of this fraud.

Ever since those emails were discovered a few years ago it was inevitable that this house of cards would fall. It certainly is taking a long time, however.

12 posted on 09/15/2013 12:13:53 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

GlowBull Warming indeed is half of climate change. The other half is GoreBull Cooling.


13 posted on 09/15/2013 12:18:14 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

Half a bucket of bull shi* is still bull shi*.


16 posted on 09/15/2013 12:40:31 PM PDT by boomop1 (term limits will only save this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

[A forecast in the 2007 report that hurricanes would become more intense has simply been dropped. . .]

Al Gore used Hurricane Katrina and the IPCC report to become a consultant to the home insurance industry. Insurers used Gore’s junk science—in part—to help justify rate hikes.


21 posted on 09/15/2013 1:51:48 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
Huge cadres of academia have been corrupted by chasing grants under the influence of such Gore-led AGW nonsense, much of it via taxpayer dollars, but also through corporate allocations of time, energy and dollars.

This is a major reason for the heavy Leftist tilting in academia, and I imagine it may take decades to get most of "these ships" once again going in directions useful to the country and society.

That a person like Jim Hansen could have such a corrupted sway at NASA's GISS, where he for many years was able to peddle his extremist, fake-science AGW nonsense should have scared every rational US taxpayer out the wazoo. There have been little-to-no checks and balances. We were only lucky enough to get secret emails exposing the baddies as peer review was useless, being corrupted from start to finish (see linked article above).

With as large a financial and societal crash as we are likely to experience in the not-distant future, hopefully the uselessness of much of academia will become rightly exposed and its lifeblood of funding will dry up, forcing many in its hallowed halls to find more honest work, even if only selling apples on the street corner.

HF

22 posted on 09/15/2013 2:00:06 PM PDT by holden (Alter or abolish it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

This is awesome! All my kooky liberal relatives have relied on this science to beat me over the head with the global warming crap for years. I am going to print this out and carry it around with me :-)


23 posted on 09/15/2013 2:35:32 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (Cogito Ergo Doleo Soetoro, ABO and of course FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
Full title: Global warming is just HALF what we said: World's top climate scientists admit computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong

The "computers" got nothing wrong, the scientists put garbage data in and got garbage data out.

24 posted on 09/15/2013 3:04:33 PM PDT by RJL (There's no greed like the greed of a liberal politician buying votes with your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
Global warming is just HALF what we said: World's top climate scientists admit computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong

Know this: If they were able to get all of their strangling taxes and regulations in place, they'd be crowing success and victory over global warming and demanding even more taxes and regulations to finish the job.

25 posted on 09/15/2013 3:08:03 PM PDT by RJL (There's no greed like the greed of a liberal politician buying votes with your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
Here's the bottom line: every time scientists build a model projecting climate change (or tomorrow's temperature), they use a probability distribution to assign confidence intervals, saying that "with 95% certainty, we can say that the expected temperature will be between X and Y."

To inflate the scare over global warming, the media and the more media-savvy (and dishonest) scientists have only been reporting the Y end of the scale.

The bottom line is that there probably is some amount of anthropogenically caused climate change, but it's nowhere near as dire or catastrophic as you'd think from people who only report worst-case (and improbable) scenarios. Certainly not enough to turn our economy upside-down over.

27 posted on 09/15/2013 6:32:30 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
A leaked copy of the world’s most authoritative(1) study reveals scientific(2) forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong.
The Mail on Sunday has obtained the final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the ultimate watchdog(3) whose massive, six-yearly ‘assessments’ are accepted by environmentalists, politicians and experts(4) as the gospel of climate science.

Hard to read any article that commits that many errors in the first two small paragraphs, by deliberate distortion or omission. None of this is new. I did not read the rest of the article; I prefer to eat my meals once, not dozens of times as the scammers are inclined to expect.

(1) This periodic study is anything but scientific. Everyone with knowledge of rudimentary science knows that.Computer models are not science. Further by now everyone knows that the IPCC consists of two groups. The science group and the political group. The political group writes the final report. Dozens of world class true scientists have disgustedly quit the group, unfortunately quietly. The political IPCC chooses what to include and what to omit from the science.

(2) No computer climate model has yet existed that could predict the climate for any ten year period between 1900 and 2010, knowing and inputting the known climate of the previous ten years. In any other discipline, that would clearly be labeled a solid FAIL.
"Authoritative" is in the same category as Clinton's view of the word "is." It certainly is such to the scamsters who promote, massage and promote the unproven science in the final reports. No one else. True scientists, certainly don't.

(3) The "Ultimate Watchdog" is a self-assigned label by the very conspirators who have been proven frauds, unethical and not above "losing (or destroying)" data that was sent to them from worldwide monitoring sources, when the data didn't fit their preconceived conclusion.
I trust that "Ultimate Watchdog" group about as much as I trust Obama's IRS, State Department and NSA.

(4) The word "Experts" has totally lost any rational meaning, when hair dressers, actors, tattoo artists and gay activists are listed among signatories of global warming issues, as "experts."

For some sort of perspective, read and judge the puerile discussion at the following link.

The Great Delusion

Greenie Watch

29 posted on 09/15/2013 7:35:37 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04
My comments at the original article:

Not without good reason, our friends on the left are keen to repeat President Eisenhower’s warning not to let the “Military Industrial Complex” tail wag or defense policy dog. Oddly, they “forget” his warning of a “Scientific Industrial Complex”…“The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.”

30 posted on 09/15/2013 7:55:51 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: matt04

Thanks


32 posted on 09/16/2013 8:19:57 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson