Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tiger Woods: A time limit is needed PGA TOUR Studying Calling In Violations
ESPN ^ | September 18th, 2013 | Staff

Posted on 09/18/2013 10:26:48 AM PDT by Third Person

ATLANTA -- Tiger Woods would like to see a time limit placed on viewer call-ins of possible rules violations and endorsed PGA Tour commissioner Tim Finchem's view that such situations need to be studied. Woods, who has been involved in three high-profile rules infractions this year while also coming under scrutiny for a drop at The Players Championship, said Wednesday that the potential for improvements in technology is part of the issue. PGA Tour commish Tim Finchem says spectators calling violations is "awkward." Should this be able to happen? Vote! "I think what the commissioner said yesterday is very appropriate,'' Woods said at East Lake Golf Club, where the season-ending Tour Championship begins Thursday. "There needs to be a time limit, and I think there needs to be a discussion obviously where is that time limit? Where is that line of demarcation? You've got to start with disqualification and then work our way back from there. "I'm sure there's going to be a lot of discussion over it. What's going to happen over the course of time? Is every player going to be mandated to have a camera follow them around everywhere they go -- all 156 players (in a regular tour event) for every shot? Or is there a certain time limit when we're going to have to do it? Is it going to change in the digital age? These are all questions and answers that need to be resolved in the near future.''

(Excerpt) Read more at espn.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cheater; golf; tigerwoods
Poor whiny baby Tiger.
1 posted on 09/18/2013 10:26:48 AM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Third Person

He should have had some of then “Tiger Boyz” come out and move the twigs for him. Then it would have been allowed.


2 posted on 09/18/2013 10:29:51 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person
Anyone can make a mistake, but I think most golfers are pretty darn scrupulous about policing themslves. The fact that Tiger has had quite a string of infractions this year makes me think that maybe he is the problem, not anything else.
3 posted on 09/18/2013 10:30:54 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (21st century. I'm not a fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person
Hey Eldrick, don't be a crybaby. The solution is to stop hitting them in the hazards so frequently. And when you do, call a rules official to consult / observe.

Tiger: Golf sure would be great, if it weren't for all those pesky spectators, fans, camera crews, sponsors...

4 posted on 09/18/2013 10:31:51 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person
Tiger Woods would like to see a time limit placed on viewer call-ins of possible rules violations

Of course he would, because he's a lowlife cheater!

It's pretty sad that someone so talented feels the need to cheat, but he's perfect for today's America.

5 posted on 09/18/2013 10:32:13 AM PDT by jpl (The government spent another half a million bucks in the time it just took you to read this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person
We need a time limit on his 15 minutes of fame.
Some of us have had enough of the scum bag.
Is it because he cheated on his wife?
No
It is because like Klintoon he is a a low life looking out for Tiger and nobody else while making big bucks being a wholesome gentleman. A 100% hypocrite.
6 posted on 09/18/2013 10:32:48 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Want proof that you need experience to run this country? Look no further than ZERO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Affirmative Action Golf:


7 posted on 09/18/2013 10:33:29 AM PDT by Third Person (Welcome to Gaymerica.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

for later


8 posted on 09/18/2013 10:33:50 AM PDT by Doctor 2Brains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

I am both a competitor and an official in a sport judged strictly by human observation. We racewalk judges are not supposed to listen to anyone else but base calls only on what we see. No photos, no instant replay. I’m less inclined to call Woods a whiner here.


9 posted on 09/18/2013 10:34:08 AM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 13 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

It’s stupid for the PGA to rely on viewers to do the job they should be doing.

And what about the guys who never get on camera, isn’t the policy unfair to those golfers that are always on television?


10 posted on 09/18/2013 10:34:18 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person
And Eldrick couldn't carry Jack Nicklaus’ athletic supporter. Even if he does equal or break 18 majors (fortunately, looking less likely), he'll still be a punk.
11 posted on 09/18/2013 10:34:22 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Hey Tiger why not just stop cheating.
You’ve wished there were no spectators on the course for your entire career, now you want no tv also.


12 posted on 09/18/2013 10:35:51 AM PDT by FreedomGuru (Oil is organic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

That incident with the boulder probably cost Ken Venturi his announcing job. He went batzo crazy on the air about it. He took on the Tiger and the tiger won.


13 posted on 09/18/2013 10:37:24 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jimfree
We racewalk judges are not supposed to listen to anyone else but base calls only on what we see. No photos, no instant replay. I’m less inclined to call Woods a whiner here.

Given that his ball clearly moved and he could not have missed it ... and given that he backed away from the ball after it happened ...

How about we call him CHEATER instead.

14 posted on 09/18/2013 10:38:51 AM PDT by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Don’t cheat and it’s not a problem.


15 posted on 09/18/2013 10:39:02 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“And what about the guys who never get on camera, isn’t the policy unfair to those golfers that are always on television?”

Well stop the Woods idolatry and have the cameras on him all the time, even when he isn’t near the lead.


16 posted on 09/18/2013 10:39:05 AM PDT by FreedomGuru (Oil is organic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Are you saying that Tiger is a Cheetah?


17 posted on 09/18/2013 10:39:20 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Are any other golfers supporting Tiger’s position?

Tiger is not the only golfer on television. Where are the other cheating scandals?

Entitled Tiger has a little ethical issue when it comes to the rules.


18 posted on 09/18/2013 10:39:47 AM PDT by Third Person (Welcome to Gaymerica.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Tiger sees the Rules of Golf as an impediment he would like to see rolled away (”oscillated” in Tiger-Speak) for him by a new “enabling rule”. His behavior this year shows he just won’t/can’t call a penalty on himself, and he feels constrained by the rules everyone else is supposed to play within. He is hurting the great game of golf.


19 posted on 09/18/2013 10:43:27 AM PDT by doyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Interesting... this coming from the only “top player” to have been involved in a controversy like the one this past weekend (or the other 2-3 incidents this season). Also interesting that this comes up in a year in which the PGA is promoting how honest its players are, signing their cards, and promising their fidelity to the rules of the sport.

I’m probably jinxing it, but here’s hoping Tiger continues to have a frustrating season this coming weekend. I’d love to see Dufner, Horshel, Sticker, Zack Johnson, Jim Furyek, Phil, etc. prevail.


20 posted on 09/18/2013 10:46:41 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I think each pro has had similar moments. Just one getting the attention.

I think the latest could only have been called by the camera seeing that 1/16” move down. An overhead view, the one tiger had would look completely different. Tiger is correct in that an oscillation is legal. He thought it was legal, has every right to insist what he saw was different from the camera and what the camera shows different from his sight.

The masters was the most unusual, Tiger made a mistake that 99% of golfers make all the time. He incorrectly played the rule by simply getting wrong where and when it crossed the hazard. BTW in full view of a lot of others including officials making the same mostake. And that is not a defense just a fact. He totally acknowledges this, he took the penalty when told. The controversy only came in how the decision was laid out. They knew of the penalty, had opportunities to tell him but waited until after he signed the card to decide to tell him.

That is a unique situation over finding out after the signature. Therefore it got a unique treatment. Find out after tough luck. But if there was opportunity to make the card right not taken, that is a legimate gripe because an official or player could abuse that to their profit or advantage.

the other one on the string happens in every tournament. You check the boundary or ground under repair with a partner but don’t call the rules official. You both make a mistake. It happens all the time on the tour. At least I see it mentioned all the time.

Hard cases make bad law is what I say. A pattern of hard cases does not make a pattern.


21 posted on 09/18/2013 10:54:26 AM PDT by jrawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

I believe a persons character is reflected on the golf course whether it be about rules, displays of anger or the use of fowl language in front of not only the gallery but the media.

The vast majority of pro golphers are high in character, too bad all aren’t and everyone can make up their own minds about Woods.


22 posted on 09/18/2013 10:57:53 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrawk
“I think the latest could only have been called by the camera seeing that 1/16” move down. An overhead view, the one tiger had would look completely different. Tiger is correct in that an oscillation is legal. He thought it was legal, has every right to insist what he saw was different from the camera and what the camera shows different from his sight.

The masters was the most unusual, Tiger made a mistake that 99% of golfers make all the time. He incorrectly played the rule by simply getting wrong where and when it crossed the hazard. BTW in full view of a lot of others including officials making the same mostake. And that is not a defense just a fact.”

Those are the two that I saw. I have to agree with your assessment. The ball moving was hard for me to spot on the replays. They had to do a real close for me to see the movement. Looking from the top it may well have appeared to be an oscillation. I did not see the third infraction.

23 posted on 09/18/2013 11:31:09 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
And what about the guys who never get on camera, isn’t the policy unfair to those golfers that are always on television?

On the other hand, many more times than Tiger has to add strokes because of media scrutiny, he gains when his huge, densely-packed galleries stop his ball from going deep into the rough. Most balls he hits beyond the ropes stop quickly when they come up against a viewer, a chair, etc. Other players don't have call-ins (which should be looked into) but their errant balls can fly, roll or bounce far into the rough, onto an adjacent fairway, over a cart path, etc. Tiger's almost never do.

24 posted on 09/18/2013 11:58:38 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jimfree
I am both a competitor and an official in a sport judged strictly by human observation. We racewalk judges are not supposed to listen to anyone else but base calls only on what we see. No photos, no instant replay. I’m less inclined to call Woods a whiner here.

I'm with you. How do you have a sport where non-participants have a say in the outcome? Imagine being Armando Galarraga: "Gee, Mr. Galarraga, we're awfully sorry that the umpire blew the call and stole your perfect game and baseball immortality from you, but there's nothing we can do about a call made on the field. Now, if you were a golfer, well that would be a different story. Joe from the 8 Mile could call in and fix things right up for you on that bad sand trap ruling." I know, let's put this into play tomorrow night at the Linc and give Ed Hochuli's number out to the Philly fans so they can text him that DeSean Jackson did get both feet in bounds or that Andy Reid was on the field during a play.

25 posted on 09/18/2013 12:26:18 PM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

To all you Wonderful golfers...

I am always hitting from the Roughf or,forest,or swamp-

I have walked up to the ball in deep rough with twigs
and such - my foot touched a buried twig and the ball
moved (almost unseen) am I to give my self an added stroke?- or just pull a judge smails... and kick the ball?

LOL


26 posted on 09/18/2013 2:26:49 PM PDT by mj1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mj1234

Sometimes I have more mulligans than regular shots!


27 posted on 09/18/2013 2:34:02 PM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Woods has a very good point and I would expand it to force all PGA tournaments to provide a PGA official for each group on the course that can be consulted with on any questionable shot.

The fact that Woods' prior two controversial infractions required intensive scrutiny by the rules committee shows that the system is not perfect and the golfers in attendance on those questionable shots had no idea of the potential rules violations.........

There is not a single person on the tour who would knowingly violate PGA rules, Woods included. Unfortunately golf is not a precise sport where rules governing it are also precise.

The vast majority of post shot penalty assessments have occured because of the vagueness of the rule that may have been violated........

So who is most likely to get the intensive video anal scrutiny over every shot, Tiger Woods or Erik Compton?

28 posted on 09/18/2013 3:02:06 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

No time limit on cheating - It ain’t the NBA Tiger.


29 posted on 09/18/2013 3:05:58 PM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

I am sport where you call penalties on youself - Tiger is a whiner. I bet he has called very few if any on himself. It’s golf not the NBA


30 posted on 09/18/2013 3:07:50 PM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: twister881

“The solution is to stop hitting them in the hazards so frequently. And when you do, call a rules official to consult / observe”

First of all, the latest infraction was very questionable.

Second of all, the ball that went into the hazard at the Masters was a nearly perfect golf shot that would have been about 8 ft. for eagle except it hit the flag and solidly and went into the hazard.


31 posted on 09/18/2013 8:21:34 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jrawk
I think the latest could only have been called by the camera seeing that 1/16” move down. An overhead view, the one tiger had would look completely different. Tiger is correct in that an oscillation is legal. He thought it was legal, has every right to insist what he saw was different from the camera and what the camera shows different from his sight.

The problem with this is the player after seeing his ball oscillate is obligated to tell his playing partners. He didn't do this. The repeated nature of his rules violations calls into question his honesty. That's just the way it is. :)

32 posted on 09/18/2013 8:34:33 PM PDT by Balata (Today's Greens are yesterday's REDS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Balata

I don’t think you are correct.

http://www.usga.org/rule-books/rules-of-golf/decision-18/

Oscillation is immaterial and not a move.

If the ball moves you must inform your partner so they can witness the replacement for 1 stroke. If you don’t inform them and play it after a move 2 strokes.

The confusion this week I think starts with all the discussion of how tiger could have gotten only a one stroke penalty instead of two. If he had ruled himself it moved, he could have notified his playing partner then they could attempt to replace the ball for a 1 stroke penalty by the rules. But since he ruled it an oscillation then he had no obligation to tell anyone. I say ruled, because players are the first ref in golf.

I think that is actually the rule by my reading.

— lates
— jrawk


33 posted on 09/19/2013 2:27:06 PM PDT by jrawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Hey Tiger...lets ask Dr Galea about his opinion? He is not a cheater either....swing change my backside


34 posted on 09/19/2013 2:33:07 PM PDT by Archie Bunker on steroids (The fear of the lord is the beginning of wisdom (Psalm 111:10))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

The whole phoned in penalty thing is goofy. The fix is easy, they have a rules guy at every hole, but they’re reactive, answering questions, make them pro-active and actually helping the players follow the rules and there won’t be anything to call in.


35 posted on 09/19/2013 2:36:34 PM PDT by discostu (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archie Bunker on steroids
Seeking and receiving "aid" from a dirty doctor.

Epic marital infidelity.

Getting busted repeatedly for breaking the rules of golf.

You're on a roll, Tiger. Keep up those winning ways.

36 posted on 09/19/2013 2:50:30 PM PDT by Third Person (Welcome to Gaymerica.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Third Person
Epic marital infidelity.

If you wish to include personal life into whether or not a PGA pro is worthy of the sport then be prepared to condemn senior favorite boy Freddy Couples..He ain't too squeeky clean either.............


37 posted on 09/19/2013 2:58:54 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Simply noting an extended pattern of behavior with Woods.


38 posted on 09/19/2013 3:25:28 PM PDT by Third Person (Welcome to Gaymerica.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

In fairness to Freddie, his first wife was insane and not squeaky clean herself. She later died from cancer, IIRC.


39 posted on 09/19/2013 3:30:08 PM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: newfreep; Third Person
In fairness to Freddie, his first wife was insane and not squeaky clean herself.

So now we're trashing the deceased wife in defense of Freddie.......got it!

40 posted on 09/19/2013 3:39:31 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

It is what it is - she was crazy and a whore.

No more. No less.

Now deal with it!


41 posted on 09/19/2013 3:53:36 PM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
It is what it is - she was crazy and a whore. No more. No less. Now deal with it!

Oh reallyyyyyyy??? According to who, the Freddie brigade?

Gee, let's not be too judgmental when it comes to Freddie.......


42 posted on 09/19/2013 4:05:20 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
she was crazy and a whore.

Now we're getting to the down and dirty.......how about citing your sources?

43 posted on 09/19/2013 4:11:23 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson