Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Republican Replacement: The GOP is introducing a plan that would replace the health-care law...
National Review Online ^ | September 18, 2013 | Andrew Stiles

Posted on 09/18/2013 10:34:10 PM PDT by neverdem

The GOP is introducing a plan that would replace the health-care law they hope to defund.

As polls highlight the American public’s unease about President Obama’s signature health-care law, House Republicans on Wednesday introduced legislation to repeal and replace it completely with a plan of their own.

The bill, called the American Health Care Reform Act, is the product of a health-care working group convened by Representative Steve Scalise (R., La.), chairman of the 175-member Republican Study Committee (RSC).

“I think we’ve done a very effective job of pointing out all the things that are bad about the president’s health-care law, but people want to know what we stand for as well,” Scalise told reporters during a briefing at the National Review office on Capitol Hill. “The public, as they get more angry about the existing law, they are going to want to have something else to put in its place.”

The group, which had been working on the plan for several months, included several members of the Republican Doctors Caucus, including Representatives Phil Roe (Tenn.), Renee Ellmers (N.C.), John Fleming (La.), and Paul Gosar (Ariz.).

“We were all saying we needed to have an alternative and put it on paper, to allow people to compare and contrast,” Gosar tells me. “We have the expertise — those of us in the doctor’s caucus who have actually provided health care. These are real solutions based on years and years in the trenches.”

Democrats have routinely criticized Republicans for attacking Obamacare without proposing a viable replacement. The president repeated this argument on Monday during his address immediately following the deadly shooting at the Washington Navy Yard. “Remember, initially this was like repeal-and-replace, and the replace thing has kind of gone off to the wayside. Now it’s just repeal.”

In fact, Representative Tom Price (R., Ga.), an orthopedic surgeon and former RSC chairman, has proposed a comprehensive replacement bill for three years running. And now, Scalise and company plan to push for a full debate and vote on their legislation. They’ll even seek input from Democrats. “You can’t pass a bill that’s entirely done by one party that affects every person in the country,” Roe said. “We’re open to Democratic ideas and amendments. We can’t just shut out an entire party.”

The RSC’s legislation is similar to Price’s proposal, and contains many ideas that conservatives will find familiar. At less than 200 pages in length, it is considerably more digestible than Obamacare, a 2,700-page piece of legislation that’s now become a 7-foot-3-inch tower of red tape. “The American people want smaller bills that they understand,” Gosar says. “The more complex you get, the harder it is to define. You paint yourself into a corner, where the government is dictating everything.”

The American Health Care Reform Act would repeal Obamacare in its entirety, in order to “start with a clean slate,” Scalise said, but would strive to achieve similar goals — more affordable health care and increased access — and do so without mandates or tax increases.

The bill aims to create a more competitive market for health insurance by letting people purchase plans across state lines and allowing small businesses to pool together to negotiate lower rates. It would also amend existing law to increase transparency in payments and pricing so patients would have a better understanding of the cost of care and ultimately become more discerning consumers. “The American people are the best consumers in the world,” Roe said. “We will drive across five lanes of interstate to get gas two cents a gallon cheaper, so don’t tell me you won’t get the same thing [in health care].”

The plan seeks to “level the playing field” between consumers who receive insurance from an employer and those who purchase insurance on the individual market. The latter group would receive significant tax breaks to offset the cost of buying insurance: Individuals would be able to claim a $7,500 deduction against their income and payroll taxes for qualifying health plans, while families would be able to deduct $20,000. The legislation would also expand access to portable health savings accounts, and increase the maximum allowable contribution to such accounts.

The bill would increase federal funding for state high-risk pools, which insure people with especially expensive and preexisting conditions, by $25 billion over ten years, and would cap premiums in those pools at 200 percent of the average premium in a given state. It would also guarantee that individuals with preexisting conditions could move between insurance plans while maintaining coverage in the interim.

Medical liability law would be reformed to cap awards on punitive damages, as well as attorneys’ fees, in an effort to limit the common (and increasingly expensive) practice of “defensive medicine.” Federal funding for abortion coverage would be explicitly prohibited except in cases of rape, incest, and risks to the life of the mother.

The bill is being introduced as Republicans on Capitol Hill appear to have coalesced around a plan to tie a government-funding resolution to a permanent defunding of the president’s health-care law. While that particular effort is unlikely to succeed this time around, Democrats will no longer be able to accuse them of not having a replacement plan for Obamacare.

“This is a starting point,” Gosar says. “We want people to be able to offer their viewpoints, and we want to share this with the American people. We’re not scared of this issue, we love this issue.”

— Andrew Stiles is a political reporter for National Review Online.

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obamacare; ppaca
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: steve86

Half the country doesn’t work or pay taxes.

41 posted on 09/19/2013 5:28:35 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Do any of these proposals exclude members of Congress and others? If so, they’re not worth the paper they’re written on. We need something with no exclusions, no waivers for “special” people and interests.

42 posted on 09/19/2013 5:49:39 AM PDT by IM2MAD (IM2MAD=Individual Motivated 2 Make A Difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Repeal and replace" = "We can do socialism better than Obama."

There is no legitimate constitutional authority for the national government to involve itself in "health care."

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”

-- James Madison, the father of the United States Constitution

43 posted on 09/19/2013 5:55:14 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InsideOutsideUpsideDown
Both of those requirements already exist.
If a person changes policies and is later found to have had an existing condition, the two insurance companies have arrangements between them to provide coverage.
The problem is if the insurance is not continuous and the condition could have occurred during the lapse.

There are also laws (COBRA) that require Insurance companies to provide coverage for insureds are separated from an employer related policy for 18 or 36 months depending on the details. This is so that they can secure other coverage before the current coverage runs out.

44 posted on 09/19/2013 6:48:08 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stanne
If we are the best, and I suppose we can be, then we can figure out how to do that.

I agree almost entirely with what you say.

About all the obese people compared to earlier times, I think that is a cultural problem that is self inflicted.
As jobs have become more sedentary and fast food establishments around every corner we get larger every year.
I live near a high school, and I am amazed at the size of these kids. I recall when I was in high school, a 200 pound boy was a good size football lineman.

45 posted on 09/19/2013 7:04:44 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice
We have tort reform in California since 1976 and our medical costs are some of the highest compared to other states.

Compared to other states I have lived in, California has above average health care. We have access to the latest equipment and the best doctors as a general rule.
Tort reform has helped.

However, to those patients on Medicaid, they don't get good service here. In the last week I am familiar with two patients who have been perforated during a colonoscopy by two different doctors who specialize in Medicaid patients.

46 posted on 09/19/2013 7:23:45 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson