Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Call me paranoid but I think Obama cut a deal with the mullahs just prior to taking office. The appearance of a softening by Iran is the same old stalling tactic with a new face.
1 posted on 09/20/2013 3:50:53 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brad from Tennessee

Bibi knows something and it could be that Iran is getting close to having a nuke.


2 posted on 09/20/2013 3:52:52 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Iran just wants to get rid of the sanctions.

Saddam built 51 palaces while his sanctions were in force.

3 posted on 09/20/2013 3:53:58 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Yup. He thinks he has more flexibility now that he doesn’t have to face reelection and can ignore the congress and the constitution with impunity. Praying that we the people through our elected representatives disavow him of those treasonous thoughts.


4 posted on 09/20/2013 3:56:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Obama is Al Quaida.

What people seem unable to get through their thick skulls is that Al Quaida has been run from Iran, and in cooperation between Sunnis and Shiites, since almost forever. Not only that, but we can prove it. We pretty close can prove that both Obama and the mullahs were in on 9.11.2001.


6 posted on 09/20/2013 3:58:34 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of the Muslim Brotherhood))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Netanyahu is witnessing a strategic disaster. Obama’s botched Syrian policy has allowed Assad’s “ally” Iran to maintain its Syrian bases for its mobile short range ballistic missiles. Israel cannot attack Iran’s nuclear facilities without suffering a devastating counterattack. The only way Iran will be stopped is if Obama decides to initiate a multi phased sustained military attack. It is highly doubtful Obama will ever seek such approval from Congress because he has absolutely no intention to start a war. Iran will gets its weapons and Israel will have to live with the terrifying peace of mutually assured destruction.


8 posted on 09/20/2013 4:05:07 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
“There is no need to be fooled by the words,” said a lengthy statement issued late Thursday in response to Mr. Rouhani’s interview this week with NBC News. “The test is not in what Rouhani says, but in the deeds of the Iranian regime, which continues to advance its nuclear program with vigor while Rouhani is being interviewed.”

I think this sums it up perfectly.

If there were actually some realistic prospect that mere talking might lead to Tehran's giving up its nuclear program, it might be worthwhile to talk. But there is not.

The only thing that might be accomplished by such a maneuver is that Iran could string out the process--placing an Israeli strike upon indefinite hold--while completing the realization of its nuclear ambitions.

12 posted on 09/20/2013 9:43:53 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson