Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TABOR lawsuit gets round in court, but decision unlikely for months(CO X-Senator Morse Plaintiff)
Gazette ^ | Updated September 23, 2013 at 8:28 pm | Megan Schrader

Posted on 09/24/2013 10:20:57 AM PDT by Red Steel

DENVER - Current and former elected officials wishing to undo the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, better known as TABOR, argued on Monday in federal appeals court that they have standing and the court has the authority to hear their complaint.

A total of 33 plaintiffs brought the suit against Gov. John Hickenlooper in May 2011, challenging the constitutionality of TABOR, a law limiting tax increases unless Colorado voters approve.

A few months later, Attorney General John Suthers sought to have the case dismissed on the grounds that none of the plaintiffs had standing and the courts didn't have the proper authority to decide the issues.

In August 2012, a U.S. District Court judge ruled against Suthers, allowing the lawsuit to move forward.

Suthers appealed that decision, bringing the matter to the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver on Monday for arguments before a three-judge panel.

"This case raises interesting issues," said state Solicitor General Daniel Domenico. "But not any that can be resolved by the federal courts."

Domenico argued that the issues at hand were beyond the scope of the courts.

A ruling on the procedural matter is expected to take months.

Voters in 1992 approved an amendment to the Colorado Constitution prohibiting government from raising taxes without a vote of the people. TABOR also requires that surplus money be returned to taxpayers when revenue grows faster than the rate of inflation and population growth. TABOR was placed on the ballot through the initiative process.

"We are not challenging the initiative process . but how it has restructured the government of Colorado," Attorney David Skaggs, a former congressman told judges Monday. "This case is about restoring Colorado's birthright . the state legislator's fountainhead of representative democracy. We must not let that fountainhead be turned into a figurehead. I pray the court will let us go forward with that cause."

TABOR was written and championed by former Colorado Springs Rep. Douglas Bruce, who cautioned success in this case by the opponents could have far reaching consequences across the nation.

"It takes away the right to petition on all subjects in all states," Bruce said. "That's so preposterous. They are so obsessed with their hatred of TABOR that they don't care about the ramifications."

Bruce said TABOR is well within the rights of the people to limit their government through initative petition and constitutional amendments.

"That's the ramification of saying that the citizens cannot put limits on government," Bruce said. "Freedom is by definition limits on government."

TABOR has become a word of scorn among many elected officials at the school, local and state levels where officials feel their hands are tied by the law and leaves them unable to raise needed revenue.

Former Republican Sen. Norma Anderson, one of the plaintiffs, said TABOR prevents lawmakers from reacting to the state's immediate needs, the Associated Press reported. If the state needs to raise more money to pay for repairs from flooding, she said it's too late to ask voters in November to approve a tax hike.

"Our form of government is still the best in the world, and it's been taken away from us in Colorado," Anderson said after the hearing.

Former Senate President John Morse, D-Colorado Springs, who lost his seat a few weeks ago in a recall election, is one of the plaintiffs in the case and listened to the arguments in Denver.

Voters approved Referendum C, which suspended the return of any surplus to voters from 2006 to 2010.

Morse said before TABOR it took the approval of 18 senators, 33 representatives and one governor to pass a bill, but after TABOR that changed to 24-40 and 2.5 million -a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate and then approval of a majority of voters.

"That's direct democracy and that's where it's changed," Morse said. "That's where in my view they have removed the representative republican form of government from Colorado and that's a violation of the U.S. Constitution that needs to be rectified."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: colorado; constitution; johnmorse; tabor; tax
The Statists and Dems don't like not being able to raise taxes on a whim.
1 posted on 09/24/2013 10:20:57 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

TABOR has been the only think keeping Colorado somewhat afloat despite the influx of dumbass libs from Kalifornia moving in...


2 posted on 09/24/2013 10:33:20 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"We are not challenging the initiative process [liar] but how it has restructured the government of Colorado...case is about restoring Colorado's birthright ... We must not let that fountainhead be turned into a figurehead."

There is so much that is wrong with that statement. But it also tells me that the politicos are scared to death of this vote. It took their power away from them.

3 posted on 09/24/2013 10:34:03 AM PDT by alancarp (Obama will grab your guns and ship them to Mexican drug mobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Morse said before TABOR it took the approval of 18 senators, 33 representatives and one governor to pass a bill, but after TABOR that changed to 24-40 and 2.5 million -a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate and then approval of a majority of voters.

“That’s direct democracy and that’s where it’s changed,” Morse said. “That’s where in my view they have removed the representative republican form of government from Colorado and that’s a violation of the U.S. Constitution that needs to be rectified.”

The Dems become “constitutional converts” in their own mind when they cannot raise taxes don’t they....

And nothing says that the states themselves can handle how they approve taxes, the US constitution doesn’t supersede the state constitution in how the state government is organized and how bills move through the state legislature...

If it did wouldn’t Nebraska be in violation because it has a Unicameral legislature?

What a G-DD-med dumbass Dim....


4 posted on 09/24/2013 10:41:34 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
It would take an especially egregious federal court to overturn a simple and straightforward constitutional amendment regarding state taxes.

Similarly, the people of California enshrined a multi-millennia old truth that marriage is between a man and a woman.

What could go wrong?

5 posted on 09/24/2013 10:52:41 AM PDT by Jacquerie (An Article V amendment convention of the states is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Morse has an unlimited amount of ignorance and arrogance.


6 posted on 09/24/2013 10:55:52 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
TABOR has been the only think keeping Colorado somewhat afloat despite the influx of dumbass libs from Kalifornia moving in...

For every California democrat moving to Colorado there are two Damn Yankees from New York, Connecticut, Chicago, Virginia, Boston and New Hampshire moving here.

The same Damn Yankees that flocked to California 30 years ago and wrecked it. I like the Californians a lot better. At least they know how to drive.

7 posted on 09/24/2013 11:32:50 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

So, their argument is that putting TABOR in the state constitution by initiative is somehow unconstitutional? That’s really a stupid argument, but I don’t see how a federal court has jurisdiction to tell a state government how it can or can’t raise revenues.


8 posted on 09/24/2013 11:54:44 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson