Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

If many or most of healthy younger types don’t sign up, opting for the fine; and most with preexisting conditions do sign up, are the insurance carriers going to absorb the losses or the taxpayer?

Does the term “adverse selection” exist anymore? I suppose we can’t talk about that or the government subsidizing those who lie about their income, which can’t be verified. The Feds gather tons of data and somehow can’t determine how much you earned last year?


11 posted on 09/25/2013 9:06:01 AM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DeFault User

So, just so I am clear about this.

These “Fees”, monthly premiums are actually a “TAX” ?.

A tax that varies based on your age, gender, income, state, smoking status etc ??


12 posted on 09/25/2013 9:16:16 AM PDT by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: DeFault User

If rats really wanted all yutes to sign up for “health care” ,why didn’t they make the fines for not doing so close to or the same as what the plan would cost?


23 posted on 09/25/2013 9:50:40 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson