Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An adult at 18? Not any more: Adolescence now ends at 25...
UK Daily Mail ^ | 9/24/2013 | Victoria Woollaston

Posted on 09/25/2013 10:13:34 AM PDT by GraceG

Adolescence no longer ends when people hit 18, according to updated guidelines being given to child psychologists.

The new directive is designed to extend the age range that child psychologists can work with from 18 years old up to 25.

It is hoped the initiative will stop children being 'rushed' through their childhood and feeling pressured to achieve key milestones quickly, reports the BBC.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adulthood; brain; immaturity; liberalism; psychology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: angry elephant

Property owners and taxpayers only.............


21 posted on 09/25/2013 10:31:59 AM PDT by Red Badger (It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong. .....Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

In some ways I agree with you. In others, well...

My parents formative years were the 1940s. By the 1950s my dad had returned home from the war, was working, and seeing his salary grow.

There was inflation in prices, but there was inflation in salaries too. Today we see inflation in many things, but not in salaries. Those remain static.

My dad stuck his neck way out to purchase a home. Within a decade the home had gone up in value by 50 to 100%. Equity was an almost instant reality. By the time that decade was up, his salary had also gone up by 25 to 50%.

Generally speaking, it’s tough for those who grew up during the 1940s and 1950 to understand what the youth of today face.

Yes, a kid today can scrape and save and get themselves into a home. And five years later that home may be worth 50 to 80% of what he financed on it. His salary, if he has the same job, will be a little more than what he was being paid five years earlier, but not all that much. And if he’s already been there seven years or so, the yearly increases may have ceased.

While it may look like a kid is blowing a lot of money, buying a home at $500k will keep that kid’s nose barely above water for decades today. It won’t be like it was in the last century, where you stuck out your nose, and were handsomely rewarded a decade or so later.

In the last century you could expect to hold your same job for ten twenty, perhaps 40 years. Today you’re lucky if it last six.

In some ways I agree with your take, but this generation faces some problems we haven’t seen in 100 years.

We have 22.8% of our workforce out of work. We have another 25% working for far less than they are qualified to be making.

We have a flood of foreign nationals being brought into the nation. We also have regions across this nation being turned into foreign soil, they have been so saturated with people who do not speak English.

We have areas where only Korean, Chinese, Spanish, Armenian, Tolog, and other languages are spoken.

I wish any kid luck trying to start out today.

In the 1970s, I would have agreed with your post a lot more. Today, not so much.


22 posted on 09/25/2013 10:32:34 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This post coming to you today from behind the Camelskin Curtain. Not the Iron or Bamboo Curtain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I was a tax payer at age 16 and a property owner at age 21.

I pay my bills and still enjoy things FROM my childhood, I wouldn’t say that I have “Lost my Childhood”.

I am able to PLAY while I am an ADULT BECAUSE I AM RESPONSIBLE!!!!!

That makes the PLAY I engage in that MUCH MORE ENJOYABLE because I have earned it and it is not HOLLOW!


23 posted on 09/25/2013 10:34:46 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

The voting age should be changed to 25, unless you’re serving in the military. I’d bet that we’d get a vast improvement in DC.


24 posted on 09/25/2013 10:35:05 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Muzzie killing muzzie what's the downside and who am I to stop them ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

they want it both ways....they want to sexualize our 5yr olds and allow condoms in br’s and let 14 yro’s go off and have abortions but still consider them children at age 25?.....


25 posted on 09/25/2013 10:36:45 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

100-some years ago, it wasn’t unusual for a 19-year-old man to put his 17-year-old wife into a covered wagon and go set up a homestead and start raising a family.


26 posted on 09/25/2013 10:37:20 AM PDT by Nea Wood (When life gets too hard to stand, kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

The result of “no fault” divorces; don’t even need a reason as you stated. Try being on the opposite spectrum, the “husband” who still has the kids, at home and has to pay out exuberant “spousal support” for a minimum of two years before your neck goes on the chopping block in “family court”. It is perverse.


27 posted on 09/25/2013 10:38:36 AM PDT by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I was married and had two children by the time I was 28. My wife was a good bit younger than that. Standard Operating Procedure in my grandparents’ day. But our peers, for whom it was still Party Time, thought it quite weird.


28 posted on 09/25/2013 10:38:48 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Liberalism/Progressivism in a nutshell

Have sex at a younger age
Be responsible at a later age

Yeah, that’s not good.


29 posted on 09/25/2013 10:39:56 AM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I know failure to launch “kids” (mostly late 20s now), and none of what you said applies to them. Because they don’t care. They have no desire to enter into the adult world, they don’t have jobs, they don’t want jobs, the don’t care about the challenges of paying their own bills because they don’t have them. Yeah those actually entering the adult world have some extra challenges, but they will handle them because they’re becoming adults. The rest are just lazy losers who are going to get a rude awakening when their parent die and they find themselves pushing 50 with no employment history and nobody around that cares if they live or die.


30 posted on 09/25/2013 10:40:58 AM PDT by discostu (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I was married and had two kids by 25. I considered it my duty to be out of the home supporting myself.

Today you need to be married to afford life. It’s a very difficult job if you live in a large metropolitan city alone.

Those who just shack-up, are kidding nobody but themselves.


31 posted on 09/25/2013 10:41:49 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This post coming to you today from behind the Camelskin Curtain. Not the Iron or Bamboo Curtain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

The Obozos have their sights on YOU!.................


32 posted on 09/25/2013 10:42:29 AM PDT by Red Badger (It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong. .....Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
There are lots of 30 year old “kids” in our neighborhood still living at home. They drive nice cars, spend weekends at the beach, and otherwise have plenty of fun with no responsibilities. Its going to catch up to them someday.

They're going to be really surprised when the inheritance they expected goes to pay off the reverse mortgage Mom & Dad bought, courtesy of Fred Thompson and/or The Fonz.

33 posted on 09/25/2013 10:45:55 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

It has already caught up to them. They are irresponsible losers living off of their parents. Responsibility will be required when they least expect it; by then it is too late. The money will run out quickly after their parents die. Things are already collapsing. Within the next 10-15 years the trend will accelerate.


34 posted on 09/25/2013 10:47:11 AM PDT by toolman1401
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
Then we shouldn’t let them vote or serve.

Or pay taxes.

35 posted on 09/25/2013 10:48:21 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I’d like to know how none of what I said could apply to these youth. It applies to all of our youth.

It looks to me like you have a certain mindset, and don’t want to acknowledge what today’s youth face.

22.8% unemployment doesn’t pertain to them? Really?

Another 25% working for half what they are qualified to make? Don’t apply? Really?

Housing prices are out of sight. This doesn’t apply? Really?

Job longevity doesn’t apply to them? Really?

Seriously, don’t you think you’re being a bit dismissive here.


36 posted on 09/25/2013 10:49:33 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This post coming to you today from behind the Camelskin Curtain. Not the Iron or Bamboo Curtain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
>>Childhood now ends at age 26. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

When I was 23 I was commanding the combat crew of a Navy bomber in Vietnam. Yet a friend's son, who is 24 and has a double degree cum laude in chemistry and math, is still at home with mom, works 3 days a week as a grocery bagger, and has no plans of ever moving out. Liberalism is more than a mental disease. Liberalism is our culture's stomach cancer.

37 posted on 09/25/2013 10:51:01 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

“...maybe they shouldn’t vote until they are 25!”

Or drive.


38 posted on 09/25/2013 10:54:42 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE ("If guns cause crime, there must be something wrong with mine." -Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
This means women will be even more incentivized to dump their husband in favor of his maintenance and child support into the kids mid-20’s. Or am I missing something?

This has been the divorce industry's wet dream. I don't know which ones offhand, but I seem to recall some states that can order child support for adults over 18 while they are in college. Any single man in the US who isn't planning on getting a vasectomy is an f***ing fool. The industry is planning to make them slaves for life.

39 posted on 09/25/2013 10:56:37 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Then they can’t vote until 25, right? ;)


40 posted on 09/25/2013 10:58:59 AM PDT by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson