Poll: Sen. Lindsey Graham’s 2014 re-election chances uncertain

The Washington Times ^ | September 25, 2013 | Alex Hopkins & Seth McLaughlin

[jazusamo]

For what polls are worth this is some good news, Graham has to be primaried.

[skeeter]

This explains Lindsey's absence on the Obamacare funding debate.

If it were otherwise he'd have his lips secured to McCain's backside, as usual.

[Uncle Miltie]

0%. We’re gonna crush him.

Linda better freshen up her lipstick and find another sucker.

[jazusamo]

Ping!

[Viennacon]

We must DESTROY him!

[pallis]

The people of SC need someone who will represent them and not the Senate, especially the radical left Senate we have right now.

[jazusamo]

Bump.

[freedom462]

I just worry that his replacement could end up being a Democrat statist who essentially agrees with Graham on his most egregious stances.

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

It’s them or us. They have to go. Every last tax-fattened RINO.

[JRandomFreeper]

Concern trolls have to be concerned.

/johnny

[sanjuanbob]

Maybe he could be the reincarnation of Arlen Specter.

[RedMDer]

Please, please, dump that RINO.

[moovova]

If McAddled would come to SC and stump for him, Lindsey would be sure to win re-election.

[jazusamo]

Amen...I believe McQueeg has that in his sights for 2016 but maybe Linda will do it first in 2014.

[Gene Eric]

FNC will be sure to give Graham plenty of airtime.

[svcw]

Best headline ever
Next great one: McCain resigns

[trubolotta]

It says there are three conservative challengers. That worries me. If it’s three big egos tearing each other apart, Grahm slides in on the spilled blood.

[webheart]

I just worry that his replacement could end up being a Democrat statist who essentially agrees with Graham on his most egregious stances.

Seems to me, I'd rather have the Democrat that I know what his positions are than a Republican who masks his true intentions. At least the Democrat isn't a liar. If ever there were a litmus test, it should be whether or not they are lying. RINO's are liars. They join whichever party would get them elected.

Don't fall into the trap of electing some guy just because he gets money from the NSRC. Better to vote him out, and suffer the consequences of whatever statist liberal democrat opposes him. Otherwise, he will just keep doing the same things over and over, safe in the knowledge that the R is going to keep him in office.

[jazusamo]

I understand in SC in the primary the winner has to have over 50% so there being three challengers it’s not such a problem.

[jazusamo]

Absolutely!