Posted on 09/27/2013 12:31:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
This was a simple case .
A security guard in a posted private security area. Discontiunued his legal surveilance of a subject at the suggestion of a police dispatcher. The guard was returing to his vehlcle when he was surprized and knocked down by the subject he was observing to the ground with his back laying on the cement walk. The guard was observed having his head being smashed on the concrete walk by the attacker. In the ensuing struggle the subject now his attacker was killed during the struggle by the guards pistol.
The regime decided to politicize the episode for political purposes.That began with the President of the United States implying the subject was a “victim” and was subsequently suborned with false and inflamtory racist hyperbole created by the regime supporters and media infastructure.
The result as we have seen is that another marxist axiom (division) has been implemented which has resulted with gangs of black youths murdering happless whites and “hispanics” who happen into areas usually where a black population is the majority. Those media outlets who by their delberate misuse of the instrument of the 1st amendment are just as complicit in those deaths as the regime is. Other forms of media particularly the black media had the duty but not the obligation to verify and report factually. But instead quoted the reports from various “mainlining” socialist media sources: Some examples here all of which serve the first purpose of selecting Zimmerman as the target.
What is the result ? Black youths believing they would get top level peer approval began attacking happless white and hispanics which may have wandered into their area which resulted in murders or serious injury and some cases stalked their white victims. In reality those victims are martyrs to the cause of American socialism., and the political opposition says nothing..
Throughout this time with innocents being murdered because of the inflamatory rhetoric composed of lies and missconceptions being driven. Obama never disassociated himself from it nor discouraged it. Using the propaganda generated the party had discarded any of its former FDR social moorings when it hyphenated itself from God at their 2012 convention from democrat into demo-coms, and believe that all groups should be hyphenated , Afro-American, Hispanic-American, etc..
To date the political opposition known as Republican has yet to mention or comment on this example of how this regime operates. Time to ask them why ?
The Republican leadership was given the opportunity as they have in the past,while running the 2012 campaigns for Senate, House, and President an opportunity to spell out what was in Obamacare but didn’t http://www.theusmat.com/ or even mention Democrats had refused any reference to God in the Democratic at their 2012 convention .
Or comment on the the “Gated Community” episode which was used to furthur hyphenate; black from “hispanic,” from “white” Americans, which included Jews. Thus discarding the American Melting Pot history in favor of the socialist agenda.
By doing this the demo-coms created a unconsionable use of the security guard incident to furthur their socialist agenda. That has resulted in martyrs because of its inflamatory assertions.. Which the political opposition ignores while claiming to search for “demographics” in other directions. Any the Republican “establishment has stood by and said and did nothing.
Except to get lectures on “bi-partisanship”
Time to ask them why ?
i think there’s more than 3% but they are afraid to speak up...
These numbers reek of Soros money. Soros has PR firms on his payroll whose sole purpose is to churn out disinformation and propaganda. These PR screeds are sent to the MSM and then presented to people as “news.”
Interviewing 1003 adults is not a large enough population to infer these statistics, IMHO. If it was about only one ethnic group, it would be enough, but when it is broken down into whites, blacks and Latinos, it loses credibility. How many blacks were actually interviewed; how many whites, etc? not enough for accuracy.
Of course, it may be true what these findings show, but I think the stats at not backed up by enough data.
” they are afraid to speak up...”
you are kidding ....right?
afraid of .... what?
do you say the same thing re; muslims
People are to be judged as individuals - yes but
Rudyard Kipling had some insight.
Blacks do seem wedded to their Marxist *ssholes.
What do the blacks have a different opinion?Is it because they think they’re going to suck off of the Federal Treasury?If that’s the case they are sorely mistaken.They treasury will be empty.
Come on......these are Obamas two top hot button issues. His campaign fodder, his tools for dividing the country. Of course there’s a stark divide between blacks and whites......and the divide is not issues but Obama.
What do the blacks have a different opinion?Is it because they think they’re going to suck off of the Federal Treasury?If that’s the case they are sorely mistaken.They treasury will be empty.
“They” should have been “the” as in the treasury will be empty.
2 plantations...
Blacks make up a huge share of government jobs at all levels...so you have these blacks catering to the lazy blacks.
Blacks have monopolized tax payer’s money coming and going...
” only 27 percent of whites, but exactly twice as large a share of minorities (54 percent), said the law would benefit “people like you and your family.”...”68 percent thought a ban (on assault weapons) would help, while only 29 percent disagreed.”
The article seeks to demonstrate a “Stark Divide Between Blacks, Whites on Gun Control and Health Care”. To me these statistics indicate a surprising amount of agreement between whites and minorities in view of the fact that the black vote was about 97% for Obama “ only 27 percent of whites, but exactly twice as large a share of minorities (54 percent), said the law would benefit “people like you and your family.”
“68 (of minorities) percent thought a ban (on assault wepons) would help, while only 29 percent disagreed.”
The article seeks to demonstrate a “Stark Divide Between Blacks, Whites on Gun Control and Health Care”. To me these statistics indicate a surprising amount of agreement in view of the fact that the black vote was about 97% for Obama and Hispanics about 70 % for Obama in the past election.
Unmangled version”
” only 27 percent of whites, but exactly twice as large a share of minorities (54 percent), said the law would benefit “people like you and your family.”...”
The article seeks to demonstrate a “Stark Divide Between Blacks, Whites on Gun Control and Health Care”. To me these statistics indicate a surprising amount of agreement in view of the fact that the black vote was about 97% for Obama in the past election, and about 70% Obama among Hispanics.
Stark Divide Between Blacks, Whites on Gun Control ...
Blacks just cannot control themselves?
-
Stark Divide Between Blacks, Whites on Health Care...
Blacks self-medicate much more?
-
Hmmm... I wonder if you posted that over on that blog if they would ban you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.