Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Dangers of a Bill De Blasio Victory in New York City’s Mayoral Race
Pajamas Media ^ | 09/28/2013 | Ron Radosh

Posted on 09/29/2013 7:25:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

As the mayoral campaign of Bill de Blasio moves on, the revelation that the likely victor was a Sandinista supporter as a young man in the 1980s has begun to be noticed. It made de Blasio actually have to respond to his Republican opponent, Joe Lhota, who had condemned him as a “Marxist.” But instead of saying something to the effect that he was young, idealistic, and perhaps wrong about Nicaragua, he openly defended his positions.

In an interview with Capital, a Manhattan-based publication, de Blasio argued that U.S. policies in Central America in the ’80s “were wrong,” and that he was only working with Jesuits and Catholics, with much of the work “done by nuns.” Well, there are nuns and then there are nuns. And de Blasio, by his own account, thinks he was on the right side, since those supported by the U.S. in the Reagan and Bush 41 years were regimes “very unfair to their own people.”

In standing firm in defense of his old positions, de Blasio has revealed how little he has learned. The truth is that the Catholics he supported in Nicaragua — including the nuns — were part of the regime-created “Popular Church,” an attempt to fuse Catholicism with Marxism in support of the Sandinista Front (FSLN), and were advocates of “liberation theology,” popular among the Catholic left in the region in those years. The regular Church, as in Poland, condemned the Sandinistas and was a strong opponent of the drift to totalitarianism.

Today, in City Journal, my old friend Sol Stern has perhaps the single best article on what a de Blasio victory might mean for New York City, and for the nation. As Stern writes, “Bill de Blasio was outed by the New York Times and then proudly stood his ground, politically and ideologically”:

De Blasio’s untroubled response to the Times’s revelations speaks volumes about New York’s rapidly changing political culture. It’s not that the next mayor will try to establish socialism or bring Sandinista ideas about the class struggle to government agencies. But de Blasio’s ascendency, perhaps even more than Obama’s, marks another step in the evolution of the Democratic party and big-city liberalism toward a twenty-first-century version of the old Popular Front. De Blasio’s City Hall will be open for business to each element of a self-styled “progressive” coalition of “inclusion.” No group or individual will be deemed too far to the left as long as they jump on the de Blasio bandwagon. Lining up to receive their fair share of the spoils will be the old Acorn organization, now renamed New York Communities for Change; the far-left Working Families Party; the United Federation of Teachers and other municipal unions; the radical Service Employees International Union, including the former Communist-led health-care workers’ union Local 1199; the civil liberties and homeless lobbies; and, of course, the onetime racial arsonist Al Sharpton, now posing as a wise elder and political power broker. To varying degrees, each will have a place at the municipal trough. Meanwhile, at the other end of City Hall—thanks to the successful efforts of the Working Families Party in many local races this year—the newly elected city council will tilt further left and will dole out even more cash to radical and activist community groups.”

Given that New York City is the financial center of our country, and hence important nationally, if the dark scenario laid out by Stern as a possible result of a de Blasio victory comes true, it bodes ill for our country as a whole. It is as important a development on the Left as was Scott Walker’s victory over the Left in Wisconsin.

To confirm how much the national Left is moving to support the de Blasio campaign, look no further than this article at Huffington Post by the New Left’s main 1960s leader and author of the Port Huron Statement that announced SDS to the nation, Tom Hayden. He likes de Blasio for one reason. His candidacy, Hayden writes, “should hugely excite the progressive base in New York politics after a long period of Republican rule. De Blasio did not leave his radical youth behind either; in the present day, he is a leading critic of stop-and-frisk and the massive economic inequalities dramatized by Occupy Wall Street.”

Hayden clearly sees de Blasio as a kindred spirit, exemplified by Hayden’s own turn to Democratic Party politics in California, where, for a time, he won a seat on the state Senate and seemed to be grooming himself for a national political role. Hayden hopes that his candidacy will mean the “awakening of a Left which often derides electoral politics.” His victory, he predicts, will “put progressive politics [read Marxist or socialist instead of progressive] on the central stage of national media coverage and debate,” and will help others like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, the avowed socialist senator from Vermont.

Oh, yes, and he hopes it will give The Nation magazine “much more mainstream impact in the political culture.” I would add that the magazine already has far too much, as its editor Katrina vanden Heuvel is a regular on the major TV networks, and often a position it takes editorially appears soon after in the editorial pages of the New York Times.

Hayden’s only regret is that the action-oriented anarchists would engage in working for de Blasio and not merely be content with chanting, wearing those horrendous masks, and smashing windows. Hayden, of course, forgets how many of them are undoubtedly inspired by Hayden’s own advocacy of such a course during the infamous Chicago Democratic Convention of 1968, when he led the riots and regularly incited the crowd to act and not just march.

So Hayden ends with what he hopes will be the end result of a de Blasio victory: “A new New Left is rising.”

Whether you call it the new Popular Front uniting unabashed Marxists, revolutionary activists, and liberal Democrats, as Stern does, or a “new New Left,” as Hayden does, it threatens the well-being of our entire country. We may not live in New York City, but we cannot ignore what is happening there. Joe Lhota is not running an inspiring campaign so far, and he has made mistakes. The odds against him are high, and he is likely to lose. However, he deserves whatever support conservatives outside New York City can give him.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: billdeblasio; byc; mayor; newyork

1 posted on 09/29/2013 7:25:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sounds fairly mainstream among today’s dems. Obama supports Christian-murdering terrorists in ... well.. everywhere.


2 posted on 09/29/2013 7:29:12 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
de Blasio in New York City, Lumumba in Jackson, Mississippi are just the new additions to a growing list of far left socialist and black liberationists in charge of our cities. Yes, I think de Blasio will be elected in NYC.
I am wondering how normal folks of all colors are going to be able to survive in this country. In fact I doubt if we can.
At the rate we are going, I suspect the break-up within the next 20-25 years or less.
3 posted on 09/29/2013 7:33:36 AM PDT by Tupelo (There are no Republicans or Democrats in Washington. Just Millionaires protecting their turf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NYCers will vote for him...they do as told by their superiors .


4 posted on 09/29/2013 7:34:13 AM PDT by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

Smart folks left these “cities” years ago.


5 posted on 09/29/2013 7:36:32 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This de Blahzio guy sounds like a typical New Yorker to me. If I recall correctly, the entire democrat party in the eighties did the bidding of the Sandanistas by denying support to the freedom fighters. What’s new? So Weiner would have been better?


6 posted on 09/29/2013 7:44:31 AM PDT by lormand (Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

People today don’t even know what a Sandanista is and don’t care.

It hasn’t hurt Tom Harkins career.


7 posted on 09/29/2013 7:49:50 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Which raises the question - why does New York City (or the State of New York, for that matter) have to remain the financial center of the US? I mean, Inter Continental Exchange, HQ'd in Atlanta, purchased the NYSE not long ago. A modern exchange can be operated from anywhere. Likewise, the banking and finance expertise now located in NY can function from any location using the internet, video conferencing, etc. So, if Di Blasio, or Di Blasio in concert with Cuomo and NY AG Schneiderman want to go overboard, watch for an exodus. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and I think these folks think that businesses will just continue to take it. If you strip out a lot more of the high income earners in the city, good luck making that town work.
8 posted on 09/29/2013 7:54:54 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

I don’t know why the folks that work in the financial district put up with paying such high taxes. If they all moved out, NYC would have no money to pay for all their social programs.


9 posted on 09/29/2013 8:08:27 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
New York is now a leading candidate to become the New Detroit.

Welcome to corruption and dysfunction...

10 posted on 09/29/2013 8:11:37 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This should be interesting: Lib judge does away with stop and frisk - already murders are on the rise, then Obamacommiecare will take effect destroying the economy even more which will raise crime even more - and to top it off the Marxists in NYC will vote for a Marxist which will be like nuking the Titanic after it hits the iceberg.

I am soooooooo glad I moved the hell out of that city.


11 posted on 09/29/2013 8:34:51 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (What do we want? Time travel. When do we want it? It's irrelevant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If de Blasio gets in, expect a big exodus of companies out of the City.

Managers and CEOs make their money by forecasting the future based on present data, and the forecast for a de Blasio administration, based on all he’s said and done so far, is .... scary.


12 posted on 09/29/2013 8:43:37 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Precisely.
NY came close to losing its primary industries before, and this could happen again.
The point is that rich people like living and working in NY because it is fashionable to do so because other rich people live there. Its a matter of critical mass. If bad politics makes NY unattractive to rich people that can change. The financial and other industries can move quickly if their owners decide to leave.


13 posted on 09/29/2013 8:45:57 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If NYC elects(?) this openly Marxist person to the Mayor’s office I can only pray for the population. A tsunami coming from the Southeast would be a welcome sight in only a few weeks.


14 posted on 09/29/2013 8:47:36 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If NY elects him, NY deserves him. Just no bailout in a couple of years.


15 posted on 09/29/2013 8:57:17 AM PDT by fungoking (Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Bill de Blasio isn't as smart as Mayor Bloomberg. When then Governor David Patterson came up with a plan to really hammer “the rich” with a huge tax increase, Bloomberg told him to back off on the idea. Bloomberg knew that a mere 48,000 city residents accounted for 50% of NYC operating budget. Taxing the rich in NYC would result in millions of dollars lost to the city and state. Why, because these rich folks would move away to escape the increased taxes.

With a true believer like Bill de Blasio as Mayor of NYC, count on him to implement his ideological stupidity. Remember, NYC voters, you voted to cut your own throats. Enjoy this putz.

16 posted on 09/29/2013 9:03:01 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There can’t be anything worse than working with Jesuits. There agenda was Catholic world rule. It is coming now to New York apparently


17 posted on 09/29/2013 9:05:08 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
No offense, but I think your post goes a long way towards explaining how we ended up with unapologetic Marxists in positions of power.

The "stop & frisk" policy you mentioned was actually something right out of a totalitarian Marxist state. I don't know if it was a "lib judge" who overturned it, but I will say that Bill de Blasio is no more leftist than the guy who he will be succeeding.

18 posted on 09/29/2013 9:09:28 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

As an independent, I was not even able to vote in the primaries. And as much as I dislike Llota, I find myself having to vote for him rather than give the Socialist give-away artist my support. It is really Sophie’s Choice, and you can’t blame me personally. I am surrounded by libtards who would, with their eyes wide open, march into a flaming oven or a gas chamber if their lib leader told them to. They really seem to have a self-destructive gene or something which compels them to select their own doom.


19 posted on 09/29/2013 9:28:37 AM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sounds like a bubba clinton


20 posted on 09/29/2013 1:58:36 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (What you get when you refuse to vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
People today don’t even know what a Sandanista is and don’t care. It hasn’t hurt Tom Harkins career.

Or Jean Cherie's career....


21 posted on 09/29/2013 2:04:09 PM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC
If there is some way to leave NYC, do everything you can to defect to the Free World outside New York. The state is doomed.
22 posted on 09/29/2013 3:56:58 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NY is simply repeating the inane actions of the
majority of people of their state, just like the majority of people here in Calif re-elected Gov. Moonbeam for another term 25 years later. (That was damned surreal, you’ve no idea.) I’d say I feel for N.Y., but whenever leeching/demoncrats become the majority, Society goes to hell. Look at our tax rates here in Calif. for starters. We deserve stronger people running for office here on the West Coast, but unfortunately, we are damned to what we have. Sad on a multitude of Levels.


23 posted on 09/29/2013 6:44:43 PM PDT by Pagey (HELL is The 2nd Term of a POTUS who uses the terms “social justice” and “fair distribution".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

90% of the people who will vote for him don’t know what a Marxist is nor do they care - they voted for Ohomo after all.


24 posted on 09/29/2013 7:13:18 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

Not with 20 years in the teacher system and a pension so close. Nope, I’ll have to ride it out here. I also have all my dear friends here, my home, my gardens, etc. Ain’t so easy to pick up as though you were 20 years old.


25 posted on 09/29/2013 7:29:02 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Yup. I understand.


26 posted on 09/29/2013 9:10:10 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson