Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Must-see Common Core math problems of the day [pics]
Twitchy ^ | 10/4/13

Posted on 10/04/2013 9:46:54 AM PDT by Impala64ssa

“Number sense,” courtesy of Common Core? We don’t know the source of that math problem, but based on what we’ve seen elsewhere, it has all the hallmarks of Common Core math.

Now try your hand at this third-grade math problem, also reportedly from a Common Core lesson:

Common Core: It’s For the Children™.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: academiccorruption; commiecore; commoncore; communist; depowerus; destroyamerica; education; enemywithin; gatesfoundation; globalist; jebbush; littleredschoolhouse; mathproblem; microsoft; miseducation; nea; nwo; publicschools; teachers; usefulidiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-127 next last
The heck with common core, here's a more relevant math problem:
If DeShawn has a $10 rock of crack, and Quintell has a $20 rock of crack, and the government takes $25,000 in income & property taxes from John, gives DeShawn 40% of that, and gives 60% to Quintell , because they're "disadvantaged", and takes $13,262.49 from Bill, because Bill is white, and gives it to LaKeisha, in the form of a "housing subsidy" so LaKeisha can rent her $1,200 apartment for $80 a month, how much does Sheila Jackson Lee get in yearly bribes?
1 posted on 10/04/2013 9:46:54 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa; All
 photo 2z4efyx_zps275ec586.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 10/04/2013 9:49:53 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa
... how much does Sheila Jackson Lee get in yearly bribes?

all of them.

3 posted on 10/04/2013 9:50:44 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

My head hurts after that.


4 posted on 10/04/2013 9:51:39 AM PDT by logitech (It is time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

WOW BUMP


5 posted on 10/04/2013 9:53:19 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

that’s actually kinda how I process large number equations but I don’t think teaching it like that is such a good idea


6 posted on 10/04/2013 9:54:26 AM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Total lack of logic in my opinion. I would like someone to seriously tell me what this lesson is supposed to teach. I teach and cannot make heads or tails of these “problems.”


7 posted on 10/04/2013 9:54:46 AM PDT by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Isn’t it easier to think 26+10=36, then add the last 7 to get 43. Seems unnecessarily complicated.


8 posted on 10/04/2013 9:54:46 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Conclusion: “Math is too hard and I’ll never understand it. Will the government take care of me if I promise to vote Democrat?”


9 posted on 10/04/2013 9:55:07 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (21st century. I'm not a fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa
I think this is designed to confuse kids to the point that no one can excel.

10 posted on 10/04/2013 9:57:32 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

“New math” the ebonics of the “scientific” community. Touchy feely arguments that hobble students.

Recall that Mr. Clinton tried to forever hobble the black community by having government recognition of poor grammar as a new “dialect” of English called “ebonics”.

Reminds me that I also viewed one of those PBS edumacation programs that air(ed?) in the daytime AFTER I’d completed college engineering. While the words used by the mechanics/physics teacher were technically correct, they would fly over the heads of much of the class of 6th-8th graders who were being screened such episodes.


11 posted on 10/04/2013 9:57:45 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

I was thinking the same thing - it’s how I process numbers in my head, but it wasn’t taught, and I know other people use different methods.


12 posted on 10/04/2013 9:59:34 AM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa; Revolting cat!; GeronL

Socialists like Roger Waters HATED rote memorization of math tables. BUT math outcomes are a constant. They NEVER CHANGE.

The sooner you accept that 1+1=2 and 2*2=4, the sooner you can put that knowledge to use.

If you keep having to “work out what the outcome will be”, you will fall far behind.


13 posted on 10/04/2013 10:00:28 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

“To quickly process it how about 20 plus ten then add 7 plus 6?


14 posted on 10/04/2013 10:00:55 AM PDT by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: logitech

My head hurts after that.
+++++++++++
It should. Here is the correct mental calculation for 26 + 17:

7 + 6 = 13
20 + 10 + 13 = 43


15 posted on 10/04/2013 10:01:23 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

ROFLMAO!!


16 posted on 10/04/2013 10:01:49 AM PDT by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; GeronL; Revolting cat!
Conclusion: “Math is too hard and I’ll never understand it."


17 posted on 10/04/2013 10:02:13 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

If two trains are heading at each other at different speeds, what percentage of people are racists and homophobes are on the trains?


18 posted on 10/04/2013 10:03:38 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Mr Reid, tear down this law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
I think this is designed to confuse kids to the point that no one can excel.

The problem is that the smart kids will still figure it out. It will just serve to make the not-as-smart kids fall farther behind, further enhancing the inherent unfairness of our society.
19 posted on 10/04/2013 10:03:39 AM PDT by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

These are not large numbers. When I was in college, we had some multiple choice answers that were simply designed to see if people were grasping the concepts and could “visualize” what a ballpark figure might be (micro numbers, macro numbers, etc.).


20 posted on 10/04/2013 10:05:52 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

I was a teacher’s aide (oh, sorry! “educational assistant”) about 20 years ago when they were just starting to introduce this sort of math, along with “make your best guess”. The teachers called it “fuzzy math” and most of them ignored it and continued to teach memorization and “older” new math. When we moved to Mass. and this became mandatory, I pulled my kids out and started homeschooling.
The way they break up the numbers and re-combine makes very little sense. I could see breaking out the 10’s (for example, 26 + 17 you might take out the 20 & the 10 to make 30, and then add the 6 & 7 to make 13 and add those to the 30 to make 43) but the random pulling out of non-related numbers makes no sense and becomes very confusing.
Honestly, is it really that hard to memorize 15-7 ??


21 posted on 10/04/2013 10:06:41 AM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa
The first one is C, the second one is ridicules.
22 posted on 10/04/2013 10:08:16 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Right, I know teaching how to think is tricky & necessary but bending others thought processes (in math) may not get you there. Math is pure, it is universal and that's probably why some like myself find it so appealing.

Side note, this reminded me of something from the 70's: "Chisanbob", remember those commercials?, I could swear Leonard Nimoy did them, my Brother & I to this day still do our chisanbob schtick...

23 posted on 10/04/2013 10:09:53 AM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
When I was in college,

This is third grade. Not college. You don't teach nine year olds like eighteen year olds.

24 posted on 10/04/2013 10:10:13 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Revenge is a dish best served with pinto beans and muffins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
I agree with you totally about the rote process. Clearly enumerated steps followed precisely, is by far the best way to teach a math procedure. All of that touchy-feely (manipulative stuff), all of those gimmicks for certain subcategories, should not be taught at all. They should be discovered, after the rote process is mastered. That's when group work and problem solving technique has a place.

These new techniques have it *ss backwards. They start with the touchy-feely and the shortcuts and the individual discovery (mostly discovered wrong) and nobody can really tell what's correct anymore.

I lost it in a class one day when they were factoring quadratic equations as a group exercise where everybody was expressing an opinion.

25 posted on 10/04/2013 10:10:26 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: twyn1

It is a lot easy to add 7 + 6 to get 13 and then carry the 1 for 43. Much Much Easier.


26 posted on 10/04/2013 10:10:55 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

These math problems appear to be some elitist’s delusion of his (or her) discovery some magnificent method to teach mental mathematics and show us all how clever they are. The simple, direct and more effective method of simply memorizing addition and multiplication tables doesn’t satisfy their desire to show us just how smart they are.

I recall tutoring my son’s friend in “college algebra” (it was really 9th grade algebra) when he had to solve 18/3. He reached for his calculator and I slammed the book down on his hand. “Use your brain and save the battery for when you really need it!” He never did that again but it showed the pathetic state of education that requires a college freshman to re-take high school algebra and depend on a calculator for such a trivial mental exercises.


27 posted on 10/04/2013 10:10:57 AM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twyn1

If you learn to memorize math tables and vocabulary words (in different languages no less), you might also improve your ability to remember names, dates, and historical facts as well as passages of the US Constitution.

Better to have sheeple fall for whatever lie the leadership wants to tell them each new day.


28 posted on 10/04/2013 10:11:12 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Can someone link the images from a non twitter site? I can’t get twitter at school. (Twitchy, I can get, just without the images.)

otherwise, ping for later.


29 posted on 10/04/2013 10:12:29 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

I still was taught vocabulary and math equations with flash cards primary school.


30 posted on 10/04/2013 10:12:57 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Well, someone has to post the link to the Tom Lehrer song, so I guess it might as well be me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vetg7vWitTU


31 posted on 10/04/2013 10:13:19 AM PDT by NurdlyPeon (It is the nature of liberals to pervert whatever they touch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

My wife took a cookie and broke it in half and handed one half to our 4 year old son.

If I keep one piece and give you the other piece what do you have?

He replied a semicircle.


32 posted on 10/04/2013 10:13:22 AM PDT by glyptol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

I use plenty of tricks to add numbers quickly, so I get the logic in the second problem.

BWTH is the first math problem? I don’t understand at all what they are trying to do.


33 posted on 10/04/2013 10:14:00 AM PDT by RadiationRomeo (Step into my mind and glimpse the madness that is me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

What difference does learning math make anyhow?

Kids have smartphones with math apps now. Plus, if it’s too confusing they can just cheat and text a friend.

Or, they can call 1-800-F1UCKYO.

/s


34 posted on 10/04/2013 10:14:15 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prof.h.mandingo

“Total lack of logic in my opinion”

But it makes your feel good.


35 posted on 10/04/2013 10:18:15 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Make today a great day. Insult a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grania

Try teaching long division (LD) to a young person that has had this mush driven into her brain. Lol, I had her doing LD my way, not the schools way, problem after problem after problem for over two hours (she hated me) until I had pounded into her head how to do LP properly so that she would always get the correct answer. Part of her problem was that she wasn’t very good a multiplication to start with! This is a high school senior honor student and she multiplied at a six grade level! Do not send your kids to public schools.


36 posted on 10/04/2013 10:18:47 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

I recently bought a book called “Algebra Demystified” and it goes through everything step-by-step, is easy to follow, explains the rules before you are asked to apply them, and costs probably about half of what a Common Core text would cost. From what I’ve seen of these Common Core questions, they are suited only for the very bright and will leave everyone else befuddled, including many who could easily learn math using more traditional methods. CC seems to try to force you to run before you can walk, and seems designed to produce failure in most students.


37 posted on 10/04/2013 10:18:58 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadiationRomeo

the answer is C, not sure what the point is, but I know the answer :)


38 posted on 10/04/2013 10:20:48 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
"I think this is designed to confuse kids to the point that no one can excel."

The CC math questions I've seen DO seem DELIBERATELY designed to frustrate children. Math can be taught in a much more straightforward manner than this (see my previous post).
39 posted on 10/04/2013 10:20:52 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: prof.h.mandingo
Total lack of logic in my opinion.

Correct. If you want to know what, say, 156+74 is, just grab a piece of paper and add the numbers up. That worked for Newton, and that worked for Einstein. It should work for today's students.

I would like someone to seriously tell me what this lesson is supposed to teach.

I was a public school teacher for many years, and I taught math much of the time. So I'm not guessing here. This is something I actually know about.

The administrator who mandated the program will tell you something like "this method teaches higher level numerical analyzing skills". Of course, that's just buzzword crap.

When you get past all the window-dressing, the bottom line is this. The administrator read a BS educational research paper somewhere. The administrator needs to justify his job, so he MUST change things around.

I see this all the time. Administrators are constantly reinventing the wheel. Students, and their teachers, are constantly being pulled this way and that.

Meanwhile, great damage is done. Students taught these weird methods are at a disadvantage going forward.

Oh, and a prediction. In a couple of years, this weird way of adding numbers will no longer be taught. It will be replaced by a totally different weird way.

40 posted on 10/04/2013 10:21:15 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Answer: “I love obastard. Now, gimmme my damn money fool!”


41 posted on 10/04/2013 10:21:48 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk

“I know other people use different methods.”

Exactly! Per the 26+17 example, my normal process would be to leap to 46-3=43.


42 posted on 10/04/2013 10:21:49 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Common Core is mental masturbation.


43 posted on 10/04/2013 10:21:55 AM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova
"Kids have smartphones with math apps now."

I deal with number quite a bit and have tools to help me add large volumes of numbers. Some times I make a mistake, I since I am pretty good at math I can look at my mistaken product and say to myself, "WTF that can't possibly be right".

44 posted on 10/04/2013 10:25:13 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

That’s pretty similar to how I do math in my head, obviously I don’t do it for little addition and subtraction like those, but the same concept works for larger numbers and multiplication and division. I call it stunt math, it can be a handy skill.


45 posted on 10/04/2013 10:26:12 AM PDT by discostu (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

The second question in particular is written in such a manner that I’m not even sure what they are asking. The “solution” given seems to me to be arbitrary and only one of many possible solutions. As for the first question, “C” seems to be the answer, but I’m not sure what the point of it is.


46 posted on 10/04/2013 10:26:27 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Maybe, but then this is the way my brain works:

20 + 10 + 2*7 -1 = 43.

It’s not really the type of thing to be teaching kids though.


47 posted on 10/04/2013 10:26:46 AM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Be that as it may my point stands. Kids need to be taught simply not with gobbledygook.

Like this.

_1
_26
+17
------
_43
You add six and seven to get thirteen. Write down the three in the ones spot and carry the 10 to the tens spot. Add two and one to make three and the one from the ones spot to make four. Your answer is forty-three.

48 posted on 10/04/2013 10:27:12 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Revenge is a dish best served with pinto beans and muffins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: prof.h.mandingo
I would like someone to seriously tell me what this lesson is supposed to teach.

Just to venture a guess, the lesson is that some people are smarter than you and you should leave all the difficult problems to them. It is the foundation of elitism.

49 posted on 10/04/2013 10:27:45 AM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

So, how long will parents put up with this nonsense?

The public schools have gone from giving everybody a calculator to do simple arithmetic to driving kids and parents nuts with this convoluted baloney BS.


50 posted on 10/04/2013 10:28:10 AM PDT by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson