Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative
Why not? The House just forced us to pay them even those NOT working.

House Approves Backpay for Furloughed Feds
(Federal News Radio ^ | Oct, 5 2013 | Jack Moore)

15 posted on 10/05/2013 12:31:08 PM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US Citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

The government can’t incur any unauthorized debts. So there’s no money to pay the military and non-furloughed civilians, but they report to work. Furloughed civilians, on the other hand, aren’t allowed to work. Both groups get back pay regardless once funds are restored even though the government isn’t obligated to pay back pay to furloughed civilians.

They’ve promised pay, but they can’t let civilian employees return to work. If they’re going to pay people regardless, then why have ridiculous laws that say those employees can’t work? They already allow excepted employees and the military to continue to work without pay (with the promise to pay them later). Why the distinction? Why not just have the entire DoD report to work in the interest of national defense, especially when they’re all going to get paid regardless???


21 posted on 10/05/2013 1:01:24 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Conservatives are not anarchists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson