Here come the leisure suits.
Don't forget the Pinto in the background.
Posted on 10/09/2013 3:13:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Federal Reserve chair nominee Janet Yellen Wednesday suggested that she will put a renewed emphasis on “jobs” in her role as Chairwoman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank.
President Obama nominated Yellen, a vice chairwoman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and former president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, to run the U.S. central bank Wednesday. If confirmed by the Senate, Yellen will become the first woman to run the Fed in its hundred-year history.
Yellen is expected to accelerate the devaluation of the dollar by continuing or even expanding the Fed’s open-ended bond-buying program. She has been consistently favored by job-creation hawks, who hope that she will follow a looser inflation policy than they expected from her chief rival for the Fed job, former Treasury Secretary and Harvard University President Larry Summers.
“I think it’s a really good pick,” economist Mark Vaughn, a fellow at the Murray Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government and Public Policy at Washington University of St. Louis, told The Daily Caller. “She’s eminently qualified. She’s got the best résumé of any designate. She’s been president of a bank, and she’s been on the board. She’s got an esteemed academic career. She’s a good manager and a good leader.”
Yellen’s brief comments Wednesday suggested she may fulfill some of the hopes of job-creation zealots. Preposterously asserting that “the economy is stronger and the financial system is more stable,” Yellen added that despite “progress” under current Chairman Ben Bernanke, U.S. monetary policy has far to go.
“The Fed’s mandate is to serve all Americans,” Yellen said. “Too many Americans still can’t find jobs and worry how they’re going to pay their bills and provide for their families.”
Yellen was alluding to the Fed’s “dual mandate” of managing inflation and maximizing employment. This mandate is based on an antique economic theory called the “Phillips Curve,” which posited an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment.
The Phillips Curve, a relic of Keynesian mythology, has been abandoned by economists after repeatedly failing to bear out in reality — most notably during the stagflation of the 1970s, and arguably during the unprecedented economic stagnation of the past six years. Since 2007, Bernanke has quadrupled the monetary base, and inflation — which is widely described as being under control or even too low — has in fact robbed the dollar of 13 percent of its value, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ inflation calculator. Yet the economy has moved sideways, inflation remains above 7 percent, and household net worth is about where it was prior to the recession — amounting to a massive disappearance of buying power with no discernible positive effects on the economy.
Yellen’s supporters hope that she will double down on the “jobs” portion of the Fed’s mandate. Vaughn cautioned that her willingness to maximize inflation may be overstated.
“A lot of people who spend time studying her speeches concluded she’s not soft on inflation,” he told TheDC. “It’s fair to say she’s more dovish than some other potential nominees, but not a dove. She’s about where Bernanke is.”
Vaughn added that Bernanke’s rampant money creation has added to the complexity of Yellen’s job.
“Her biggest challenge is going to be as much political as monetary policy,” he told TheDC. “The Fed has this unprecedented balance sheet and she’s going to have to unwind it. It has a lot of mortgage-backed securities in its portfolio, and the housing industry is very strong in Washington. This is not a country that’s in love with central banking, going back to the foundation of the republic. In some ways, the Fed was lucky in its enemies, because Ron Paul is kind of goofy. But he was making some legitimate points. Her big challenge is going to be maintaining the Fed’s independence and fighting down political attacks.”
Another challenge for any Fed chief is keeping Americans convinced that “controlled” inflation is a naturally occurring or positive phenomenon — a notion that flies in the face of all lived experience for people outside the fantasy realm of monetary policy, who see only boarded-up businesses, high unemployment and endless economic stagnation.
Although monetarists maintain that inflation is a key component of modern economics, it has in fact been understood for centuries. In “The Wealth of Nations,” economist Adam Smith discusses inflation at length — always describing it as debauchment of the currency that enriches the king at the expense of his subjects.
Rather than refuting this obvious point, monetarists rely on hectoring propaganda, such as this short film from the Depression era:
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
The Fed celebrates its 100th birthday later this year. The dollar has lost more than 95 percent of its value during that time. In the hundred years prior to the Fed’s creation, the United States expanded from a handful of states on the eastern seaboard to a continent-spanning nation, acquired both Alaska and Hawaii, abolished slavery, built the transcontinental railroad, became an unprecedented world power, and experienced levels of economic growth and social mobility that it has never again matched — all of those achievements having been accompanied by steady deflation that left the dollar worth more in 1913 than it had been in 1813.
Making everything more expensive will cure this how again?
Who said that?
Great, now one LB of beef will weigh 6oz.
We have Cruz if he’s not palying us too.
The elderly who thought their careful savings would last them during their retirements better start stocking up on dog food. It will be in short supply with this idiot at the helm of the Fed. But she is The First Woman Fed Chief, another affirmative action hire for Obumbles, and that’s what matters. No doubt she’ll be the puppet and Obumbles will be pulling the strings, led by his inflated self-esteem that has no connection to experience.
Since half the population is now used to not working at all and the half willing have to pay for the half unwilling, why the heck does she even care about jobs? If the country has decided as a matter of policy to rely on only half the population as oarsmen, why would they want to disincentivize the willing to save? Government control and regulation begets only more until we end up where 1+1 wont even equal 2 anymore. This great thing we’ve had is over.....
Can someone explain the concept inflation ———> jobs ? Is there any actual theory other than some scatterplot somebody made. 50 years ago?
Nobody repaying their student loans? There must be consequences, no?
Won’t the banks/Sallie Mae force either just take the money or otherwise force them into backruptcy?
“The socialist revolution can only succeed when the bourgeois (the Middle Class)are crushed between the twin grindstones of inflation and taxation
That really is happening. If they really wanted the “rich” to pay, they would tax actual wealth and not paychecks.
Can’t wait for those trillion-dollar paychecks.
I need to walpaper a few rooms, I was thinking 1 dollar bills, but now I am thinking 1 beeelion dollar bills would look far cooler...
They claim this chick is a genius-—a keynsian genius. “Devaluation of the dollar”-—oh, yeah. Beranky already did that and she is smart enough to realize/admit it, I guess. What she’s admitting is that the inflation monster has been held back with phony book keeping about as long as it can be. Remember back in Jimmah’s day they hadn’t figgered out a way to lie about it yet? And I still remember that mortgage I had at 11-1/2%. Oh, the fun that is coming. They have always intended to pay down the Fed debt with wheelbarrow sized purty colored bills. Did you see the new 100 note-—looks like Eurotrash money?
Wanna bet she triples QE?
There is no guarantee that their wages will rise in an inflationary way!
Vladimir Lenin
Great, another Keynesian psychopath.
In office a few days and already she’s a failure.
Inflation destroys everything, including jobs.
When prices go up, the value of money goes down, and makes the ‘economic indicators’ go up. But the numbers are bogus, because they are not in constant-value figures.
There is colossal stupidity on the part of economists and journalists. When dollars are worth less, the numbers go up. People with a brain know that the higher numbers are meaningless due to inflation. But economists, journalists, and other mental midgets start crowing about the rising numbers.
USA has become an insane asylum; I long for the righteous Kingdom with the Law.
More Q$E? Wait a minute, its at 85 billion a month now, that’s a lot of printing money. That comes out to 10 bucks a day per every American. 300 a month. I still haven’t received any.
They say they are buying mortgage backed securities, well they can buy mine....one million dollars and they can buy it.
And now they are going to print MORE?.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.