Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

93 House members charge Park Service is 'making up' rules to shut memorials
Washington Examiner ^ | 10-10-2013 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 10/10/2013 6:46:16 AM PDT by markomalley

The National Park Service’s closure of the World War II and other memorials violates rules requiring them to stay open, 93 House members charge in a letter to the agency.

Led by Michigan Republican Rep. Bill Huizenga, they claim that Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis is simply making up closure rules to punish the public during the government shut down and they question the costs of the random closures in Washington where not all memorials are being closed.

"The National Park Service continues to act in an arbitrary and punitive manner to exclude veterans from memorials built in their honor and the American people from many of our country's national treasures. I have serious questions about the tactics and decisions being implemented by the National Park Service and clearly many of my colleagues do as well," said Huizenga.

"Director Jarvis cannot simply make up the rules as he goes along, which is one of the major reasons my colleagues and I sent this letter requesting concrete and definitive answers,” added Huizenga.

According to the National Parks Conservation Association there are 401 U.S. parks closed as of Thursday, including the Mall in downtown Washington and nearby Shenandoah National Park.

The letter from nearly a quarter of the members of the House of Representatives cites the “contingency plan” used by the Park Service to determine memorial closings that they say clearly requires big memorials in urban areas to remain open.

“The National Park Service section of that plan clearly states that: ‘All concession operated services and facilities would be closed unless they are deemed essential for health and safety reasons, are needed to support on-going excepted NPS activities or are located in urban areas where...full NPS law enforcement coverage is continued due to the inability to control visitor access,’” said the letter provided to Secrets.

“These urban, open-air memorials seem to be precisely the type of exception outlined in the department’s plan and, as such, should remain open to the public,” the 93 added.

Their letter, below, asks the Park Service to explain the policy and nudges the agency to keep them open, as many were during the last government shutdown.

October 9, 2013

Jonathan B. Jarvis

Director - National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

1849 C St. NW

Washington D.C. 20240

Dear Director Jarvis:

As you are no doubt aware, the closure of select open-air monuments and park service units during the ongoing partial government shutdown has been a cause of great concern for the public.

In particular, the barricades erected around open-air sites like the World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War memorials served to inconvenience countless veterans travelling to Washington, D.C. as part of honor flights from around the country.

It is our understanding that specific park closures were determined according to the Contingency Plan for Operations in the Absence of FY 2014 Appropriations dated September 26, 2013. The National Park Service section of that plan clearly states that:

All concession operated services and facilities would be closed unless they are deemed essential for health and safety reasons, are needed to support on-going excepted NPS activities or are located in urban areas where...full NPS law enforcement coverage is continued due to the inability to control visitor access.

These urban, open-air memorials seem to be precisely the type of exception outlined in the Department’s plan and, as such, should remain open to the public.

Due to the continued lack of consistent implementation of this plan, we would like a better understanding of the process that led to these decisions. Please respond to the following questions:

Multiple lower profile open-air memorials and areas remain open on the National Mall and around the National Capital Region. What factors were considered when the determination was made to close some areas, while leaving others open?

During the partial government shutdown of 1995 and 1996 the currently closed memorials on the National Mall remained open. What were the contributing factors to this change in NPS policy?

What is the cost to operate an open-air site such as the World War II Memorial on a typical day? How much is the National Park Service saving per day at that memorial by operating in its current “shutdown” posture?

What is the estimated total cost to install barricades and patrol the perimeter of each open-air memorial and area during the shutdown. What is the total cost to breakdown and remove all barricades once normal operations resume?

On multiple occasions since the shutdown began, members and staff have counted as many as seven NPS employees on-site at the World War II Memorial. How many NPS staff members are assigned to these memorials during a normal shift?

Initially, NPS logo signs were posted at each of the closed memorials indicating that the area was closed due to the government shutdown. On the second day of the shutdown the signs were removed and replaced with new, non-logo signs simply stating that “This site is closed”. Why were the original signs replaced and who requested the change? How much did it cost to remove and replace these signs?

We look forward to your response and stand ready to work with the National Park Service to ensure that the American people aren’t unnecessarily burdened during the ongoing federal government shutdown.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this urgent matter.

Sincerely,

Representative Bill Huizenga (MI-02)

Signatories

1. Rep. Lynn Jenkins (KS-02)

2. Rep. Jim Bridenstine (OK-01)

3. Rep. Stephen Fincher (TN-08)

4. Rep. Bob Gibbs (OH-07)

5. Rep. Jeff Duncan (SC-03)

6. Rep. Billy Long (MO-07)

7. Rep. Richard Nugent (FL-11)

8. Rep. Dan Benishek (MI-01)

9. Rep. Lee Terry (NE-02)

10. Rep. Kevin Cramer (ND)

11. Rep. Matt Salmon (AZ-05)

12. Rep. Doug LaMalfa (CA-01)

13. Rep. Jason Smith (MO-08)

14. Rep. Phil Gingrey (GA-11)

15. Rep. John Campbell (CA-45)

16. Rep. Tim Walberg (MI-07)

17. Rep. Michelle Bachmann (MN-06)

18. Rep. Steve Stivers (OH-15)

19. Rep. Keith Rothfus (PA-12)

20. Rep. Tim Griffin (AR-02)

21. Rep. Phil Roe (TN-01)

22. Rep. Bill Cassidy (LA-06)

23. Rep. Mark Sanford (SC-01)

24. Rep. Steve King (IA-04)

25. Rep. Doug Lamborn (CO-05)

26. Rep. Steve Stockman (TX-36)

27. Rep. David Valadao (CA-21)

28. Rep. Aaron Schock (IL-18)

29. Rep. Tom Petri (WI-06)

30. Rep. Alan Nunnelee (MS-01)

31. Rep. Bill Posey (FL-08)

32. Rep. Renee Ellmers (NC-02)

33. Rep. Justin Amash (MI-03)

34. Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (GA-03)

35. Rep. Spencer Bachus (AL-06)

36. Rep. Mike Kelly (PA-03)

37. Rep. Larry Bucshon (IN-8)

38. Rep. Joe Wilson (SC-02)

39. Rep. Robert Pittenger (NC-09)

40. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (FL-27)

41. Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01)

42. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03)

43. Rep. Scott Garrett (NJ-05)

44. Rep. Bill Flores (TX-17)

45. Rep. Robert Latta (OH-05)

46. Rep. Vicky Hartzler (MO-4)

47. Rep. Jackie Walorski (IN-02)

48. Rep. Brad Wenstrup (OH-02)

49. Rep. Trent Franks (AZ-08)

50. Rep. Ted Poe (TX-02)

51. Rep. David McKinley (WV-01)

52. Rep. Mick Mulvaney (SC-05)

53. Rep. David Reichert (WA-08)

54. Rep. Tom McClintock (CA-04)

55. Rep. Paul Broun (GA-10)

56. Rep. Richard Hudson (NC-08)

57. Rep. Scott DesJarlais (TN-04)

58. Rep. Stevan Pearce (NM-02)

59. Rep. Jack Kingston (GA-01)

60. Rep. Jeff Miller (FL-01)

61. Rep. Kevin Yoder (KS-03)

62. Rep. Tom Cotton (AR-04)

63. Rep. Mac Thornberry (TX-13)

64. Rep. Steve Chabot (OH-01)

65. Rep. Joseph Pitts (PA-16)

66. Rep. Chris Stewart (UT-02)

67. Rep. Robert Aderholt (Al-04)

68. Rep. Randy Hultgren (IL-14)

69. Rep. Bob Goodlatte (VA-06)

70. Rep. David Joyce (OH-14)

71. Rep. Cynthia Lummis (WY)

72. Rep. Pete Olson (TX-22)

73. Rep. Tom Price (GA-06)

74. Rep. Randy Neugebauer (TX-19)

75. Rep. Andy Harris (MD-01)

76. Rep. Mike Conaway (TX-11)

77. Rep. Bill Johnson (OH-06)

78. Rep. Gregg Harper (MS-03)

79. Rep. Reid Ribble (WI-8)

80. Rep. Steve Daines (MT)

81. Rep. John Fleming (LA-04)

82. Rep. Scott Perry (PA-04)

83. Rep. Marlin Stutzman (IN-03)

84. Rep. Joe Barton (TX-06)

85. Rep. Cory Gardner (CO-04)

86. Rep. Todd Rokita (IN-04)

87. Rep. Randy Weber (TX-14)

88. Rep. Rodney Davis (IL-13)

89. Rep. Jon Runyan (NJ-03)

90. Rep. Mark Meadows (NC-11)

91. Rep. Andy Barr (KY-06)

92. Rep. Robert Hurt (VA-06)

93. Rep. Kerry Bentivolio (MI-11)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: barrycades; brownshirts; govtshutdown; jarvis; nationalparks; obamapunishes; openairmemorials; operationwhipcracker; parkservice; parkservicedirector; wwiimemorial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2013 6:46:16 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The NPS public servants sure got into this government shutdown. A lot of “inner Nazis” came out of the tree huggers.


2 posted on 10/10/2013 6:48:48 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The DemocRAT Pahtay! Spending our grandchildren's future, today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Why are these wimps blaming the NPS? They should be blaming NPS director Jarvis as Obama’s Quisling.

Obama. Obama. Obama.

Stop being so darn polite and get in his face. (And the media’s face.)


3 posted on 10/10/2013 6:50:00 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I have not yet seen any substantial cases of civil disobedience noted in the news regarding breaching the Barrycades. Is it happening yet?


4 posted on 10/10/2013 6:50:06 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Once respected Federal law enforcement agencies such as ATF and National Park Service Rangers have been transformed into Obama goon squads.


5 posted on 10/10/2013 6:51:11 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

and keep their feet to the fire to get the answers


6 posted on 10/10/2013 6:52:25 AM PDT by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“93 House members charge in a letter to the agency.”

The NPS is SOOOOO scared.


7 posted on 10/10/2013 6:54:00 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Good point. There’s a very real potential for one of these Yogi Bear ranger types to fancy themselves as suddenly empowered to be “enforcers” and step over the line. An emotional reaction by an untrained person that could easily lead to a needless tradedy if you know what I mean. Its worrisome.


8 posted on 10/10/2013 6:54:29 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474
They should be blaming NPS director Jarvis as Obama’s Quisling.

Ahhh, but Hitler Jarvis never killed Barrycaded anyone. He was only GIVING ORDERS!

9 posted on 10/10/2013 6:54:30 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
In this shutdown the NPS has gone from being perceived as one of the most benign agencies, with high public favorability ratings, to just about the most reviled organization in the country.

Literally decades of work to build up public trust, gone in a matter of days. Way to go, Park Service. Way to go.

Another example of how everything Obama touches turns to sh!t.

10 posted on 10/10/2013 6:56:55 AM PDT by Wyrd bi ful ard (Gone Galt, 11/07/12----No king but Christ! Don't tread on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley


11 posted on 10/10/2013 6:57:07 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

In general, most feds will do whatever they’re told. They will follow orders and will NOT risk their jobs for anything. You can be sure of that.


12 posted on 10/10/2013 6:57:52 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Way to go, House members!! Fight the fascist bastards!!

Hold the line against Obama and his corrupt Marxist minions!! We can do this!!

Our future as a free nation hangs in the balance!!


13 posted on 10/10/2013 6:58:05 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Make an announcement park supervisors attitude during shut down will be assessed for promotion to the new National Park at Fukishima Japan...


14 posted on 10/10/2013 6:58:25 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I don’t see my Congresscretin’s signature on this. But I’m not surprised given she’s a Commiecrat.


15 posted on 10/10/2013 6:58:58 AM PDT by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (My sweet talk is also savory and creamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
This is confusing. The memorials, parks, historic sites and monuments belong to ALL OF US. The federal government pays people to supervise those holdings. If the federal government is shut down, they can't pay anyone to supervise them, so they say. But they still belong to US. It's a non-sequitor....how does not supervising OUR property equate to being able to remove us from it?

He's a parallel: let's say I pay my neighbor to mow my lawn. Then I decide not to pay him. So what happens? He doesn't mow my lawn. But he can't kick me off my property.

16 posted on 10/10/2013 7:01:04 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

The MSM is blaming the NPS shutdowns on Congress, i.e., the Republicans.

These Congress members ask the NPS nicely to reconsider.

When are the Republicans gonna realize that Progressive ideology’s practitioners are at war with liberty and its supporters, and that we are NOT all neighbors on the same basic side with the same basic objectives?

The MSM must be crushed. Our legislators need to go after the persons of the media personally.

And we must understand that our Obama supporting friends are not our friends.


17 posted on 10/10/2013 7:01:13 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It is not punishment. It is blackmail.


18 posted on 10/10/2013 7:02:13 AM PDT by Piranha (Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have - Saul Alinsky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

They wouldn’t be doing it if they thought that Obama would disapprove.


19 posted on 10/10/2013 7:02:20 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

Go even further..to the Secretary of the Interior..Sally Jewell. She replaced Salazar. I sure wish the ‘media’ could get either one of them in front of a mike to explain their actions.


20 posted on 10/10/2013 7:02:25 AM PDT by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson