Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House says bill to pay military death benefits 'not necessary,' senator blasts Obama
Fox ^ | October 10, 2013

Posted on 10/10/2013 3:11:43 PM PDT by Kaslin

WASHINGTON – The White House signaled Thursday that President Obama might not sign a bill to pay death benefits to the families of fallen soldiers, leading a top Republican senator to allege the president has hit a "new low."

The Senate approved the bill Thursday afternoon, after it cleared the House a day earlier. The bill would reinstate the $100,000 "death gratuity" payments to military families, as well as resume funeral and burial expenses -- after funding was suspended as a consequence of the partial government shutdown.

But White House Press Secretary Jay Carney claimed the bill was "not necessary," noting that charity group The Fisher House Foundation had just entered into an agreement with the Pentagon a day earlier to provide the benefits in the short-term.

"The legislation is not necessary," Carney said, adding that the Defense Department has already agreed to reimburse the Fisher House.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Oddly enough, the person who did something was Democrat Senator Manchin, supposedly brokering the deal (along with Secretary Hagel). The whole thing is so odd and illegal.

41 posted on 10/10/2013 6:54:40 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Kaslin.

Government shutdown: Senate sends Obama military pay bill
Politico | 30SEP13 | AUSTIN WRIGHT
Posted on 09/30/2013 2:56:59 PM PDT by familyop

42 posted on 10/10/2013 7:10:03 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

then resign or refuse to go into combat enmass, they are still there own persons, the government does not own them.

43 posted on 10/11/2013 6:44:12 AM PDT by GailA (THOSE WHO DON'T KEEP PROMISES TO THE MILITARY, WON'T KEEP THEM TO U!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
If it only were that easy.

It takes 2/3 in each house to override a veto. Meaning it wound take 67 votes in the Senate to override the veto, and since we do not have the majority there dingy Harry Reid would never agree to it, and although we do have the majority in the House, we still would need 290 votes to override the veto.

Even if we could get that many together it will not do us any good because of what I explained above

44 posted on 10/11/2013 7:00:46 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Not paying them is exactly what his half-melanin-wealthy fellow travellers, Just-us Brothers, Sharpton and Jackson, do all the time.

45 posted on 10/11/2013 12:34:13 PM PDT by holden (Alter or abolish it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson