Skip to comments.Ron Paul Backs Cuccinelli, Snubs Libertarian Sarvis
Posted on 10/13/2013 8:08:21 AM PDT by Maelstorm
click here to read article
Millions of the votes Perot received were from people who wouldn’t have voted anyway because of the excitement of the Perot circus. Without Bush, Perot wouldn’t have happened.
>> Dont need a second of time to think about NOT supporting the anti-life pot smoking gay marriage libertarian party,
We don’t say democrats when referring to Democrats.
Your beef is with the Libertarian Party and the yahoos that subscribe to it. A libertarian does not intrinsically support the things on your list.
Someone only talked of the Libertarian Party and their platform is online. Nobody ever mentioned individual libertarians but it’s a long time since one expected those associated with the libertarian cause to be reasonable and Gary Johnson pulled his 2% or however much of the national vote.
Ron has endorsed Cuccinelli before. His biggest fault in my opinion is he unlike his son was never interested in winning or making sure his message wasn’t construed to be isolationist.
No, what's excessive is the number of RNC apparatchiks who are RINOs.
I don’t necessarily disagree, but I find it ironic that people who were praised in 2010 are suddenly RINOs now. I don’t think I agree with anyone 100% of the time. I don’t think that makes them a RINO though.